Tests – · 1 test Owners 72 · 104 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 vs Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+ — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 1 road tests and 104 + 658 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: ExtremeContact DWS 06 72, Pilot Sport A/S 3+ 71.
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · 1 test Owners 69 · 658 reviews
Best test result: #6 of 19 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires (tested tread life (miles))
“Just had these Pilot Sport A/S 3+ installed to replace OEM Dunlops”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
75
Dry
ExtremeContact DWS 06 +174Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DWS 06 Pilot Sport A/S 3+ Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 72 (est.) ≈ 72 (est.) Reviews found online 79 77 ExtremeContact DWS 06: 60% × 72.5 (est.) + 40% × 78.9 = 75
Pilot Sport A/S 3+: 60% × 71.8 (est.) + 40% × 77.3 = 74
No road tests of dry for ExtremeContact DWS 06. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Pilot Sport A/S 3+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
79
Wet
ExtremeContact DWS 06 +178Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DWS 06 Pilot Sport A/S 3+ Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 77 (est.) ≈ 76 (est.) Reviews found online 82 80 ExtremeContact DWS 06: 60% × 77.1 (est.) + 40% × 82.2 = 79
Pilot Sport A/S 3+: 60% × 75.9 (est.) + 40% × 80.1 = 78
No road tests of wet for ExtremeContact DWS 06. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Pilot Sport A/S 3+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
67
Snow
ExtremeContact DWS 06 +760Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DWS 06 Pilot Sport A/S 3+ Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 65 53 ExtremeContact DWS 06: 60% × 68.9 (est.) + 40% × 65.4 = 67
Pilot Sport A/S 3+: 60% × 64.8 (est.) + 40% × 52.5 = 60
No road tests of snow for ExtremeContact DWS 06. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for Pilot Sport A/S 3+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
67
Comfort
ExtremeContact DWS 06 +463Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DWS 06 Pilot Sport A/S 3+ Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 66 60 ExtremeContact DWS 06: 40% × 68.3 (est.) + 60% × 66.4 = 67
Pilot Sport A/S 3+: 40% × 67 (est.) + 60% × 60 = 63
No road tests of comfort for ExtremeContact DWS 06. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Pilot Sport A/S 3+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
69
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DWS 06 Pilot Sport A/S 3+ Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) – Reviews found online 73 – ExtremeContact DWS 06: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 73.3 = 69
No road tests of noise for ExtremeContact DWS 06. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
65
Treadwear
Pilot Sport A/S 3+ +469Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DWS 06 Pilot Sport A/S 3+ Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests 70 73 Reviews found online 59 64 Tested Tread Life (Miles) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 67% 73% ExtremeContact DWS 06: 60% × 69.9 + 40% × 58.6 = 65
Pilot Sport A/S 3+: 60% × 72.5 + 40% × 63.5 = 69
-
75
Handling (owners)
ExtremeContact DWS 06 +867Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DWS 06 Pilot Sport A/S 3+ Reviews found online 75 67
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 | Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+ |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 71 |
| Dry | 75 | 74 |
| Wet | 79 | 78 |
| Snow | 67 | 60 |
| Comfort | 67 | 63 |
| Noise | 69 | – |
| Treadwear | 65 | 69 |
| Handling (owners) | 75 | 67 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
72
/ 100
ExtremeContact DWS 06
71
/ 100
Pilot Sport A/S 3+
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
In the overall rankings of 1 tests that ran both, Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 finished ahead 0 times and Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+ 1 times.
| Discipline | Category | ExtremeContact DWS 06 | Pilot Sport A/S 3+ | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tested Tread Life (Miles) | Treadwear | 67% | 73% | −6.6 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires · 225/40R18 |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #6/19 | #2/19 | – | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires · 225/40R18 |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ExtremeContact DWS 06
Pros
- Exceptional wet and dry traction
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Strong performance in light snow and cold weather
Cons
- Softer sidewalls can reduce steering sharpness or cause rollover during heavy track/autocross use
- Tread wear can be faster than expected with aggressive driving or on lower-profile sizes
- Occasional reports of increased road noise or vibration as the tire ages
Tire B Pilot Sport A/S 3+
Pros
- Dry and wet grip, cornering, and steering response, with many reviewers describing it as close to a summer tire. Wet traction and hydroplaning resistance are especially praised.
- Large improvement over OEM tires (Pirelli, Bridgestone, Goodyear, Dunlop, Continental) and especially over run-flats, with better ride, handling and often less noise.
- Good light-snow and cold-weather capability for an ultra-high-performance all-season tire, which lets owners avoid separate summer and winter sets.
Cons
- Premature treadwear is the most common complaint. Many report 10k–25k miles, rear tires and staggered setups wearing fastest, and some cases of tread chunking, flaking, cracking or dry rot. Many call the 45k warranty unrealistic.
- Road noise, including humming, droning or roaring around 60–75 mph. It often worsens with wear, and some reviewers say it is among the loudest tires they have owned.
- Weak snow and ice traction for some owners. Some describe it as unsafe, especially in deeper snow or on RWD cars, and say it falls short of the marketed winter rating.
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Positive
Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+
Community members widely praise the Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+ for its dry handling, wet grip, and substantial improvement in ride comfort over stock tires. However, several users express reservations about its poor traction in genuine snow conditions and note that road noise can become prominent as the tread wears. It is frequently compared against competitors like the Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 as well as its successor, the Pilot Sport All Season 4.
bobistheoilguy.com
·2 upvotes ·2024-03-01
“Slam me if you must, but I bought the Falken Azenis FK460 A/S in size 255-40x19 for my 2016 Mustang GT, based largely on Tire Rack testing and their customer comments. First thing I noticed was they are quieter than my old Michelin Pilot Sport A/S3+ tires, which were noisy when new and got worse. Also, the rear tires don't want to slip out like the Michelins when I get on the gas through a tight turn. However, the Michelins had been on the car for >6 years and 27K miles. But other than than the two categories above, it's hard for me to discern a lot of difference. Maybe it's only in my head, but perhaps the Michelins were a bit more responsive to quick motions at the steering wheel. I have no idea how well the Falkens will perform after 20K miles, but for me that's probably 4 years from now. Fair or not, I shied away from the Contis because I had read about balancing issues on a couple websites.”
r/WRX
·28 upvotes ·2017-12-19
“Just had these Pilot Sport A/S 3+ installed to replace OEM Dunlops”
r/GolfGTI
·4 upvotes ·2020-02-14
“Pilot Sport A/S 3+ Tires just installed Just got the tires on this morning with an alignment and proper balancing. Holy cow, night and day difference from the original Bridgestones on the car. Car handles so much better. It honestly makes me feel like I just bought a new car. If you have any questions or are considering getting them, feel free to ask!”
Top themes
#Dry cornering grip#Wet traction performance#Snow traction limitations#Road noise over time#Ride comfort comparison#Balancing and tire pressure#Comparison to Continental DWS
Based on 47 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 | B · Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+ |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 560 A - AA A | 500 AA A |
| Treadwear warranty | 50,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | — |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
72
/ 100
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06
71
/ 100
Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+
Too close to call: Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 and Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+ are within 2 points overall. Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 is stronger on handling, snow and comfort. Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+ is stronger on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 scores 75 vs 67 on handling.
Pick tire A
You drive through snowy winters
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 scores 67 vs 60 on snow.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 scores 67 vs 63 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+ scores 69 vs 65 on treadwear.
Tire A · Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06
Tire B · Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ExtremeContact DWS 06 or Pilot Sport A/S 3+?
Which is better in the wet, ExtremeContact DWS 06 or Pilot Sport A/S 3+?
Neither, by our numbers: 79 vs 78 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, ExtremeContact DWS 06 or Pilot Sport A/S 3+?
Neither, by our numbers: 75 vs 74 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is better in snow, ExtremeContact DWS 06 or Pilot Sport A/S 3+?
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06, 67 vs 60 on our snow score.
Which is more comfortable, ExtremeContact DWS 06 or Pilot Sport A/S 3+?
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06, 67 vs 63 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, ExtremeContact DWS 06 or Pilot Sport A/S 3+?
Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+, 69 vs 65 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology