Tests – · 1 test Owners 72 · 104 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 vs Vredestein Quatrac 5 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 6 road tests and 104 + 671 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: ExtremeContact DWS 06 72, Quatrac 5 73.
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 73 · 6 tests Owners 73 · 671 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 9 in 2018 AMS All Season Tyre Test (dry handling)
“A guy on YouTube vlogged his experience with the quatrac 5 in his mirage. It's a good all weather tire for the occasional blast of snow but is by no means a substitute for actual snow tires.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
75
Dry
ExtremeContact DWS 06 +372Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DWS 06 Quatrac 5 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 6 tests ≈ 72 (est.) 72 Reviews found online 79 72 ExtremeContact DWS 06: 60% × 72.5 (est.) + 40% × 78.9 = 75
Quatrac 5: 60% × 72.1 + 40% × 71.5 = 72
No road tests of dry for ExtremeContact DWS 06. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
79
Wet
ExtremeContact DWS 06 +376Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DWS 06 Quatrac 5 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 6 tests ≈ 77 (est.) 75 Reviews found online 82 77 ExtremeContact DWS 06: 60% × 77.1 (est.) + 40% × 82.2 = 79
Quatrac 5: 60% × 75.4 + 40% × 77.4 = 76
No road tests of wet for ExtremeContact DWS 06. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
67
Snow
Quatrac 5 +370Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DWS 06 Quatrac 5 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests ≈ 69 (est.) 70 Reviews found online 65 71 ExtremeContact DWS 06: 60% × 68.9 (est.) + 40% × 65.4 = 67
Quatrac 5: 60% × 70.3 + 40% × 70.5 = 70
No road tests of snow for ExtremeContact DWS 06. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
67
Comfort
Quatrac 5 +673Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DWS 06 Quatrac 5 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 66 74 ExtremeContact DWS 06: 40% × 68.3 (est.) + 60% × 66.4 = 67
Quatrac 5: 40% × 69.9 (est.) + 60% × 74.4 = 73
No road tests of comfort for ExtremeContact DWS 06. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Quatrac 5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
69
Noise
Quatrac 5 +170Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DWS 06 Quatrac 5 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 73 Reviews found online 73 ≈ 66 (est.) ExtremeContact DWS 06: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 73.3 = 69
Quatrac 5: 60% × 72.7 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 70
No road tests of noise for ExtremeContact DWS 06. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
No owner ratings of noise for Quatrac 5. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
65
Treadwear
Quatrac 5 +873Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DWS 06 Quatrac 5 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 2 tests 70 74 Reviews found online 59 71 ExtremeContact DWS 06: 60% × 69.9 + 40% × 58.6 = 65
Quatrac 5: 60% × 73.8 + 40% × 71.3 = 73
-
75
Handling (owners)
Quatrac 5 +176Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DWS 06 Quatrac 5 Reviews found online 75 76 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison66Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DWS 06 Quatrac 5 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests – 66
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 | Vredestein Quatrac 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 73 |
| Dry | 75 | 72 |
| Wet | 79 | 76 |
| Snow | 67 | 70 |
| Comfort | 67 | 73 |
| Noise | 69 | 70 |
| Treadwear | 65 | 73 |
| Handling (owners) | 75 | 76 |
| Efficiency | – | 66 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Recomputed
Headline score
72
/ 100
ExtremeContact DWS 06
73
/ 100
Quatrac 5
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | ExtremeContact DWS 06 | Quatrac 5 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #6/19 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires | #14/15 2019 Autonavigator Summer Tire Test R16 | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ExtremeContact DWS 06
Pros
- Exceptional wet and dry traction
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Strong performance in light snow and cold weather
Cons
- Softer sidewalls can reduce steering sharpness or cause rollover during heavy track/autocross use
- Tread wear can be faster than expected with aggressive driving or on lower-profile sizes
- Occasional reports of increased road noise or vibration as the tire ages
Tire B Quatrac 5
Pros
- Exceptional grip and traction in wet conditions and winter weather (snow and ice)
- Low road noise and high ride comfort
- Good year-round versatility eliminating the need for seasonal tire swaps
Cons
- Faster or uneven tread wear reported by some users, particularly on the outer edges
- Softer sidewalls can induce a 'squishy' feel or slight loss of steering feedback
- Less aggressive dry-pavement handling compared to dedicated summer tires
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Positive
Vredestein Quatrac 5
Community sentiment toward the Vredestein Quatrac 5 is largely positive, with owners highlighting strong value, quiet comfort, and capable year-round traction. While recognized as a solid 3PMSF-rated all-weather tire, several users note that it cannot match dedicated winter tires in heavy snow and that tread wear can be rapid due to soft rubber compounds.
insightcentral.net
·2020-12-31
“Appreciate the feedback. I never updated this thread! My impressions: The Vredesteins seem to be a great tire for the price, and a decent compromise. Grip was in fact improved once the tires broke in. They can hold onto the road on a dry day in 2nd, but still don't have a snowflake's chance of holding onto the road in 1st. They feel squishier than RE92s - softer sidewalls? They're also getting a bit low on tread a year and a half later, but that's probably more my fault than the tires '. I think I have 15,000 miles on them, and I might get another 10,000, which is with a fair bit of wheel spin and the very occasional smoky burnout. Fuel economy is pretty good - I'm seeing around 55mpg @ 58mph with a 2.4L engine once fully warmed up and in good conditions, and ~50mpg @ 65mph. Frankly, I think I've seen CVT Insights with RE92s do worse.”
audiworld.com
“After weeks of research I put Vredestein Quatrac 5's on my Q5 - best tire I've ever driven, totally changed the characteristics of the car, for the better. In very cold / near-icy conditions, they were still like driving in the summer. Once my dealer-fit, nearly new, non-RF Continentals are done, I'll absolutely be switching to V'stein Q Pros.”
r/Miata
·1 upvote ·2021-12-29
“Are these Quatrac5 new ? After 15k miles my rear wheels are struggling to put down traction on damp roads if I am not real gentle on gas pedal on first gear from stop go traffic.”
Top themes
#Snow and winter traction#Tread wear and longevity#Affordable price and value#Wet and dry handling#Road noise and comfort#All-weather 3PMSF performance
Based on 93 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 | B · Vredestein Quatrac 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 63 |
| Rim diameters | — | 13″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 560 A - AA A | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 50,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | — |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
72
/ 100
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06
73
/ 100
Vredestein Quatrac 5
Too close to call: Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 and Vredestein Quatrac 5 are within 2 points overall. Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 is stronger on dry and wet. Vredestein Quatrac 5 is stronger on treadwear, comfort and snow.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Vredestein Quatrac 5 scores 73 vs 65 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Vredestein Quatrac 5 scores 73 vs 67 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 scores 75 vs 72 on dry.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 scores 79 vs 76 on wet.
Tire A · Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06
Tire B · Vredestein Quatrac 5
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ExtremeContact DWS 06 or Quatrac 5?
Which is better in the wet, ExtremeContact DWS 06 or Quatrac 5?
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06, 79 vs 76 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, ExtremeContact DWS 06 or Quatrac 5?
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06, 75 vs 72 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, ExtremeContact DWS 06 or Quatrac 5?
Vredestein Quatrac 5, 70 vs 67 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, ExtremeContact DWS 06 or Quatrac 5?
Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 70 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, ExtremeContact DWS 06 or Quatrac 5?
Vredestein Quatrac 5, 73 vs 67 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, ExtremeContact DWS 06 or Quatrac 5?
Vredestein Quatrac 5, 73 vs 65 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology