Tests – · 1 test Owners 71 · 104 reviews
Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 vs Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 104 + 12 owner reviews. How we score
ExtremeContact DWS 06 is ahead, 73–61
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 59 · 12 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
74
Dry
ExtremeContact DWS 06 +1361Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DWS 06 Geolandar G055 Blue Earth Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 72 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 78 58 ExtremeContact DWS 06: 60% × 71.9 (est.) + 40% × 78.2 = 74
Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 63.8 (est.) + 40% × 58 = 61
No road tests of dry for ExtremeContact DWS 06. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
77
Wet
ExtremeContact DWS 06 +2057Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DWS 06 Geolandar G055 Blue Earth Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 75 (est.) ≈ 60 (est.) Reviews found online 79 53 ExtremeContact DWS 06: 60% × 75.2 (est.) + 40% × 79.4 = 77
Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 60.3 (est.) + 40% × 52.9 = 57
No road tests of wet for ExtremeContact DWS 06. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
67
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DWS 06 Geolandar G055 Blue Earth Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) – Reviews found online 64 – ExtremeContact DWS 06: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 64.4 = 67
No road tests of snow for ExtremeContact DWS 06. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
69
Comfort
ExtremeContact DWS 06 +465Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DWS 06 Geolandar G055 Blue Earth Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 68 62 ExtremeContact DWS 06: 60% × 68.9 (est.) + 40% × 68 = 69
Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 67.9 (est.) + 40% × 61.8 = 65
No road tests of comfort for ExtremeContact DWS 06 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
70
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DWS 06 Geolandar G055 Blue Earth Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) – Reviews found online 73 – ExtremeContact DWS 06: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 70
No road tests of noise for ExtremeContact DWS 06. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
66
Treadwear
ExtremeContact DWS 06 +165Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DWS 06 Geolandar G055 Blue Earth Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 70 ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 61 64 ExtremeContact DWS 06: 60% × 69.8 + 40% × 60.5 = 66
Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 65.1 (est.) + 40% × 64 = 65
No road tests of treadwear for Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
74
Handling (owners)
ExtremeContact DWS 06 +1658Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DWS 06 Geolandar G055 Blue Earth Reviews found online 74 58
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 | Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 73 | 61 |
| Dry | 74 | 61 |
| Wet | 77 | 57 |
| Snow | 67 | – |
| Comfort | 69 | 65 |
| Noise | 70 | – |
| Treadwear | 66 | 65 |
| Handling (owners) | 74 | 58 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
ExtremeContact DWS 06
Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ExtremeContact DWS 06
Pros
- Exceptional wet and dry traction
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Strong performance in light snow and cold weather
Cons
- Softer sidewalls can reduce steering sharpness or cause rollover during heavy track/autocross use
- Tread wear can be faster than expected with aggressive driving or on lower-profile sizes
- Occasional reports of increased road noise or vibration as the tire ages
Tire B Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
Pros
- Extremely quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Improved fuel economy and low rolling resistance
- Adequate dry road grip and handling
Cons
- Dangerous or unreliable wet weather traction, particularly lateral grip and cornering
- Prone to wheel spin on damp or wet surfaces
- Accelerated or uneven tread wear reported on certain crossover and SUV models
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 | B · Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 560 A - AA A | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 50,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | — |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06
Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
Winner: Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 — better wet, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 12 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 scores 77 vs 57 on wet.
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 scores 74 vs 58 on handling.
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 scores 74 vs 61 on dry.
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 scores 69 vs 65 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ExtremeContact DWS 06 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?
Which is better in the wet, ExtremeContact DWS 06 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06, 77 vs 57 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, ExtremeContact DWS 06 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06, 74 vs 61 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, ExtremeContact DWS 06 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06, 69 vs 65 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, ExtremeContact DWS 06 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?
Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 65 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology