Tests – · none yet Owners 64 · 16 reviews
Continental ExtremeContact DWS vs Continental ProContact — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 16 + 12 owner reviews. How we score
ExtremeContact DWS is ahead, 67–53
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 45 · 12 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
65
Dry
ExtremeContact DWS +1352Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DWS ProContact Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 58 (est.) Reviews found online 63 43 ExtremeContact DWS: 60% × 66.1 (est.) + 40% × 63.4 = 65
ProContact: 60% × 57.7 (est.) + 40% × 43 = 52
No road tests of dry for ExtremeContact DWS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for ProContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
70
Wet
ExtremeContact DWS +1357Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DWS ProContact Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 60 (est.) Reviews found online 70 52 ExtremeContact DWS: 60% × 70.3 (est.) + 40% × 70 = 70
ProContact: 60% × 60.2 (est.) + 40% × 51.5 = 57
No road tests of wet for ExtremeContact DWS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for ProContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
66
Snow
ExtremeContact DWS +1452Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DWS ProContact Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 61 (est.) Reviews found online 63 39 ExtremeContact DWS: 60% × 68.2 (est.) + 40% × 63.3 = 66
ProContact: 60% × 60.6 (est.) + 40% × 39.3 = 52
No road tests of snow for ExtremeContact DWS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for ProContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
66
Comfort
ExtremeContact DWS +1848Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DWS ProContact Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 65 39 ExtremeContact DWS: 40% × 68 (est.) + 60% × 65.2 = 66
ProContact: 40% × 62.6 (est.) + 60% × 38.6 = 48
No road tests of comfort for ExtremeContact DWS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for ProContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
60
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DWS ProContact Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) – Reviews found online 51 – ExtremeContact DWS: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 50.6 = 60
No road tests of noise for ExtremeContact DWS. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
63
Treadwear
ExtremeContact DWS +1053Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DWS ProContact Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 58 (est.) Reviews found online 61 44 ExtremeContact DWS: 60% × 64.3 (est.) + 40% × 60.5 = 63
ProContact: 60% × 58.3 (est.) + 40% × 43.8 = 53
No road tests of treadwear for ExtremeContact DWS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for ProContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
68
Handling (owners)
ExtremeContact DWS +2345Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DWS ProContact Reviews found online 68 45
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ExtremeContact DWS | Continental ProContact |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 67 | 53 |
| Dry | 65 | 52 |
| Wet | 70 | 57 |
| Snow | 66 | 52 |
| Comfort | 66 | 48 |
| Noise | 60 | – |
| Treadwear | 63 | 53 |
| Handling (owners) | 68 | 45 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
ExtremeContact DWS
ProContact
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ExtremeContact DWS
Pros
- Exceptional grip and safety in wet weather conditions and heavy rain
- Superior winter and snow performance compared to many competing all-season tires
- Smooth, comfortable ride quality with compliant road manners
Cons
- Softer sidewalls reduce sharp handling response and feel when pushed at or beyond the limit
- Some users report higher-than-expected road noise
- Mixed performance in severe or deep winter conditions
Tire B ProContact
Pros
- Predictable and safe handling on dry pavement
- Competent performance in high-heat conditions
- Generally comfortable ride quality for calm, daily driving
Cons
- Significant increase in road noise as the tire ages
- Premature tread wear and limited mileage lifespan
- Structural reliability issues, including sidewall bubbles and flat-spotting
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ExtremeContact DWS | B · Continental ProContact |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 540 A A | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 50,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | — |
| Max pressure | 50 - 51 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental ExtremeContact DWS
Continental ProContact
Winner: Continental ExtremeContact DWS — better handling, comfort and snow. It leads or ties in every category we score. Continental ExtremeContact DWS rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 16 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Continental ProContact rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 12 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Continental ExtremeContact DWS scores 68 vs 45 on handling.
Continental ExtremeContact DWS scores 66 vs 48 on comfort.
Continental ExtremeContact DWS scores 66 vs 52 on snow.
Continental ExtremeContact DWS scores 65 vs 52 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ExtremeContact DWS or ProContact?
Which is better in the wet, ExtremeContact DWS or ProContact?
Continental ExtremeContact DWS, 70 vs 57 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, ExtremeContact DWS or ProContact?
Continental ExtremeContact DWS, 65 vs 52 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, ExtremeContact DWS or ProContact?
Continental ExtremeContact DWS, 66 vs 52 on our snow score.
Which is more comfortable, ExtremeContact DWS or ProContact?
Continental ExtremeContact DWS, 66 vs 48 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, ExtremeContact DWS or ProContact?
Continental ExtremeContact DWS, 63 vs 53 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology