Tests 74 · 2 tests Owners 70 · 45 reviews
Best test result: #6 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))
Head-to-head
Updated
Continental ExtremeContact Sport vs Falken Azenis FK510 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 2 + 31 road tests and 45 + 907 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: ExtremeContact Sport and Azenis FK510 are level at 71.
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 74 · 31 tests Owners 66 · 907 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 9 in 2018 Sport Auto 19 inch UHP and Track Day Tyre Test (wet braking)
“I have Fallen FK510s and live where it rains 300 days a year, they perform great and I'm sure the 520 is even better”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
77
Dry
ExtremeContact Sport +374Why this score
Source ExtremeContact Sport Azenis FK510 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 28 tests 74 73 Reviews found online 80 75 ExtremeContact Sport: 60% × 73.9 + 40% × 80.4 = 77
Azenis FK510: 60% × 72.9 + 40% × 75.4 = 74
-
80
Wet
Azenis FK510 +585Why this score
Source ExtremeContact Sport Azenis FK510 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 29 tests 80 89 Reviews found online 81 78 ExtremeContact Sport: 60% × 79.6 + 40% × 80.5 = 80
Azenis FK510: 60% × 89 + 40% × 78.3 = 85
-
47
Snow
Azenis FK510 +855Why this score
Source ExtremeContact Sport Azenis FK510 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 56 (est.) ≈ 61 (est.) Reviews found online 32 46 ExtremeContact Sport: 60% × 56.4 (est.) + 40% × 32.2 = 47
Azenis FK510: 60% × 61.3 (est.) + 40% × 45.5 = 55
No road tests of snow for ExtremeContact Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
No road tests of snow for Azenis FK510. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
73
Comfort
ExtremeContact Sport +1657Why this score
Source ExtremeContact Sport Azenis FK510 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 6 tests ≈ 70 (est.) 42 Reviews found online 74 68 ExtremeContact Sport: 40% × 70.1 (est.) + 60% × 74.4 = 73
Azenis FK510: 40% × 41.7 + 60% × 67.6 = 57
No road tests of comfort for ExtremeContact Sport. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
71
Noise
ExtremeContact Sport +467Why this score
Source ExtremeContact Sport Azenis FK510 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 18 tests 73 66 Reviews found online 68 67 ExtremeContact Sport: 60% × 72.9 + 40% × 68.1 = 71
Azenis FK510: 60% × 66 + 40% × 67.3 = 67
-
69
Treadwear
ExtremeContact Sport +366Why this score
Source ExtremeContact Sport Azenis FK510 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 5 tests 70 73 Reviews found online 68 54 Tested Tread Life (Miles) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 62% 54% ExtremeContact Sport: 60% × 70.2 + 40% × 68 = 69
Azenis FK510: 60% × 73.1 + 40% × 54.2 = 66
-
75
Handling (owners)
ExtremeContact Sport +372Why this score
Source ExtremeContact Sport Azenis FK510 Reviews found online 75 72 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison51Why this score
Source ExtremeContact Sport Azenis FK510 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 19 tests – 51
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ExtremeContact Sport | Falken Azenis FK510 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 71 | 71 |
| Dry | 77 | 74 |
| Wet | 80 | 85 |
| Snow | 47 | 55 |
| Comfort | 73 | 57 |
| Noise | 71 | 67 |
| Treadwear | 69 | 66 |
| Handling (owners) | 75 | 72 |
| Efficiency | – | 51 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Recomputed
Headline score
71
/ 100
ExtremeContact Sport
71
/ 100
Azenis FK510
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
In the overall rankings of 1 tests that ran both, Continental ExtremeContact Sport finished ahead 1 times and Falken Azenis FK510 0 times.
| Discipline | Category | ExtremeContact Sport | Azenis FK510 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 100% #2/5 · 2017 Car and Driver UHP Tyre Test | 94% #7/10 · 2025 Tire Rack UUHP Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 98% #3/5 · 2017 Car and Driver UHP Tyre Test | 97% #6/10 · 2025 Tire Rack UUHP Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 100% #1/5 · 2017 Car and Driver UHP Tyre Test | 98% #2/10 · 2025 Tire Rack UUHP Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 100% #1/5 · 2017 Car and Driver UHP Tyre Test | 96% #6/10 · 2025 Tire Rack UUHP Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Noise | Noise | 99% #2/5 · 2017 Car and Driver UHP Tyre Test | 100% #3/10 · 2022 Sport Auto UHP, UUHP and Semi Slick Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Tested Tread Life (Miles) | Treadwear | 62% | 54% | +7.6 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires · 215/60R18 |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #2/22 | #5/22 | – | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires · 215/60R18 |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ExtremeContact Sport
Pros
- Exceptional dry and wet traction with high confidence in the rain
- High value for money compared to primary competitors like Michelin
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality for an ultra-high-performance tire
Cons
- Softer sidewalls leading to a slight delay or lack of immediate steering feedback and precision
- Requires a brief warm-up period in colder temperatures, sometimes causing temporary vibrations
- Stiff ride over sharp road imperfections noted by some users
Tire B Azenis FK510
Pros
- Outstanding grip in both wet and dry conditions
- Exceptional value and lower price point compared to premium brands
- Smooth and comfortable ride quality that absorbs road imperfections well
Cons
- Accelerated tread wear and shorter overall lifespan
- Softer sidewalls can result in slightly delayed initial steering response or a feeling of looseness during aggressive high-speed maneuvers
- Occasional reports of increased tire noise or harshness on specific rough or concrete road surfaces
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Continental ExtremeContact Sport
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Mixed
Falken Azenis FK510
Community members frequently view the Falken Azenis FK510 as an affordable, budget-friendly alternative to premium tires like Michelin Pilot Sports, offering strong wet weather grip and good everyday road comfort. However, opinions are mixed due to rapid treadwear, with multiple drivers reporting bald tires in 10,000 to 15,000 miles or poor durability during track and autocross sessions. Furthermore, some users note compromises in steering response, road noise, and overall performance compared to top-tier max performance tires.
r/TeslaModelS
·1 upvote ·2025-11-28
“2022 MS Plaid on 21" archnids. Factory Michelins replaced at 7,500 miles (at wear markers). FK510's after 9,000 miles on the rubber are at 7/32. Expecting another 5,000 miles or so. They're comparable treadwear rating but last longer. Heavy car with lots of torque will inevitably go through tires sooner than the rated mileage. I'm fortunate to have decent alignment from the factory as the wear was even. Good luck on the next set of tires.”
corvetteforum.com
“I purchased a full set of Falken Azenis FK510 tires in January of last year. Ride, quietness, and wet/dry handling were all right on the money with the Tire Rack and other reviews that I looked over when deciding which tires to buy. Now I'm wishing I'd gone ahead and spent the extra money to get another set of Michelins. The rear tires are completely worn down now after only daily driving the car and putting maybe 15k miles on the tires. The same driving conditions with the previous Michelin PSIII tires resulted in the tires lasting for 5 years and 50k miles. Tread wear is the only complaint I have with these tires, but it is one massive issue with tires only lasting 15k miles with tame daily driving. My advice is to spend the extra money and get the Michelin tires. That's what I'll be doing this weekend.”
r/Mustang
·1 upvote ·2025-12-28
“Accidentally bought a Falken FK510 at discount tire when my other rear tire is a FK460A/S I have a brand new 460A/S on my driver rear a week ago and I went to discount yesterday and accidentally bought the 510 for my passenger rear. My biggest concerns is the difference in grip and wear and for the torsen limited slip on my GT PP1. I just daily my car to work and floor it at lights and don’t do canyon or track runs. I saw discount tire has a return / exchange policy, has anyone gone this route?”
Top themes
#budget friendly pricing#wet weather traction#fast treadwear#track durability concerns#ride comfort#cabin road noise#daily street driving
Based on 63 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ExtremeContact Sport | B · Falken Azenis FK510 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 1 | 93 |
| Rim diameters | 17″ | 17″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | 10/32″ |
| UTQG | 340 AA A | 300 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | 30,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 44 - 51 psi | 50 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
71
/ 100
Continental ExtremeContact Sport
71
/ 100
Falken Azenis FK510
Too close to call: Continental ExtremeContact Sport and Falken Azenis FK510 are within 2 points overall. Continental ExtremeContact Sport is stronger on comfort, noise and dry. Falken Azenis FK510 is stronger on snow and wet.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Continental ExtremeContact Sport scores 73 vs 57 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You drive through snowy winters
Falken Azenis FK510 scores 55 vs 47 on snow.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Falken Azenis FK510 scores 85 vs 80 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want a quieter cabin
Continental ExtremeContact Sport scores 71 vs 67 on noise.
Tire A · Continental ExtremeContact Sport
Tire B · Falken Azenis FK510
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ExtremeContact Sport or Azenis FK510?
Which is better in the wet, ExtremeContact Sport or Azenis FK510?
Falken Azenis FK510, 85 vs 80 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, ExtremeContact Sport or Azenis FK510?
Continental ExtremeContact Sport, 77 vs 74 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, ExtremeContact Sport or Azenis FK510?
Falken Azenis FK510, 55 vs 47 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, ExtremeContact Sport or Azenis FK510?
Continental ExtremeContact Sport, 71 vs 67 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, ExtremeContact Sport or Azenis FK510?
Continental ExtremeContact Sport, 73 vs 57 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, ExtremeContact Sport or Azenis FK510?
Continental ExtremeContact Sport, 69 vs 66 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology