tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Continental Premium Contact 2 vs Firestone Multihawk — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

Multihawk leads, 68–64 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · Multihawk or Premium Contact 2 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Tire AContinental

Premium Contact 2

Summer

Tests – · none yet Owners 62 · 202 reviews

Best test result: #3 of 6 in 2010 Autocar Tyre Test - FWD (overall ranking)

“Re: directional Behaviour now greatly improved since tyres have bedded in, handling feels as it used to. Tried differing pressures but eventually ended up as per the book and previous tyre sets at 28 front 34 rears. Thanks for the warning about directional fitting, they are clearly marked and profiled for outside edge and fitted accordingly but I do not think they are directional. Just need rebalancing now they have settled.”

Tire BFirestone

Multihawk

Summer

Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 16 reviews

Best test result: #8 of 15 in 2011 European Summer Tyre Test - 175/65 R14 (overall ranking)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 66

    Dry

    Multihawk +3
    69
    Why this score
    SourcePremium Contact 2Multihawk
    Reviews found online6570
  2. 68

    Wet

    Multihawk +2
    70
    Why this score
    SourcePremium Contact 2Multihawk
    Reviews found online6870
  3. 65

    Comfort

    Multihawk +1
    66
    Why this score
    SourcePremium Contact 2Multihawk
    Reviews found online6163
  4. 57

    Treadwear

    Multihawk +9
    66
    Why this score
    SourcePremium Contact 2Multihawk
    Reviews found online5167
  5. 63

    Handling

    Multihawk +7
    70
    Why this score
    SourcePremium Contact 2Multihawk
    Reviews found online6370
Scores at a glance
CategoryContinental Premium Contact 2Firestone Multihawk
Relative Score 64 68
Dry 66 69
Wet 68 70
Comfort 65 66
Treadwear 57 66
Handling 63 70

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Premium Contact 2

Multihawk

The professional test results behind the scores

Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.

DisciplineCategoryPremium Contact 2MultihawkΔBoth?
Overall Ranking Overall 33% #3/6 · 2010 Autocar Tyre Test - FWD 13% #8/15 · 2011 European Summer Tyre Test - 175/65 R14 +20.8 Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Premium Contact 2

Pros

  • Excellent grip and stability in both dry and wet conditions
  • High level of steering feedback and communicative handling
  • Strong resistance to aquaplaning

Cons

  • Rapid and premature tread wear
  • Performance degradation as the tire reaches the second half of its tread life
  • High price point relative to its longevity
All owner themes in the Premium Contact 2 review

Tire B Multihawk

Pros

  • Excellent price-to-performance ratio
  • Strong dry-weather grip and handling
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality for daily commuting

Cons

  • Inconsistent wet-weather traction
  • Reports of premature tread wear or structural issues
  • Twitchy handling on uneven or poor road surfaces
All owner themes in the Multihawk review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Continental Premium Contact 2

Mixed

Community feedback on the Continental Premium Contact 2 presents a mixed perspective, with some users highlighting poor treadwear and wet traction across Continental sets, while others appreciate its value pricing and OEM status. Discussions frequently focus on pricing versus competitors like Michelin PP2, sizing, asymmetric mounting requirements, and break-in behavior.

team-bhp.com

“Quote: Originally Posted by reignofchaos Rudra if you are looking for PP2s in 205/60 R15, I'd say look for other options. After switching to 205/55 R15 Advan Neovas, I can say for sure that the PP2s make the steering feel way heavier than it ought to be and it also slowed down the car. For a while I thought it was stability, but now I feel that its just an unwanted effect. Most people complain about advans slowing them down, I'm actually relishing the fact that my car actually feels faster with them than before. PP2s grip really well in the straight line but their lateral grip is no way close to the Advans. Nor is the wet weather performance, nor is ride comfort. I'm not kidding - I'm finding 205/55 R15 Advans way more comfortable than 205/60 R15 PP2s. Plus PP2s wore out quite soon for me - roughly 30k or so. Given your style of driving, I wouldnt be surprised if the Advans last 10k! :”
bimmerfest.com ·2008-02-01

“These tires are directional, right? If so, make sure they're all installed in the right direction. A friend of mine recently had the exact problem you describe. After thinking it might be shocks, tire pressure, etc. we noticed that one of the tires was installed by the tire shop so it rotated in the wrong direction.”
team-bhp.com

“Quote: Originally Posted by Rudra Sen Hmm, so they can be a proper substitute if one doesn't get PP2 fresh stock? Rudra if you are looking for PP2s in 205/60 R15, I'd say look for other options. After switching to 205/55 R15 Advan Neovas, I can say for sure that the PP2s make the steering feel way heavier than it ought to be and it also slowed down the car. For a while I thought it was stability, but now I feel that its just an unwanted effect. Most people complain about advans slowing them down, I'm actually relishing the fact that my car actually feels faster with them than before. PP2s grip really well in the straight line but their lateral grip is no way close to the Advans. Nor is the wet weather performance, nor is ride comfort. I'm not kidding - I'm finding 205/55 R15 Advans way more comfortable than 205/60 R15 PP2s. Plus PP2s wore out quite soon for me - roughly 30k or so.”
Top themes
#treadwear and durability#pricing and value#tire break-in period#asymmetric mounting orientation#grip comparison with competitors#sidewall stiffness

Based on 11 community posts

Tire B

Firestone Multihawk

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental Premium Contact 2 B · Firestone Multihawk
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available38—
Rim diameters14″ – 18″—

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental Premium Contact 2

Firestone Multihawk

Winner: Firestone Multihawk — better treadwear, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Firestone Multihawk scores 66 vs 57 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Firestone Multihawk scores 70 vs 63 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Firestone Multihawk scores 69 vs 66 on dry.

Tire A · Continental Premium Contact 2
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Firestone Multihawk
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.

68

Narrow edge

Multihawk

Amazon