tirewheelguide

Continental Premium Contact 5 SUV looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Continental Premium Contact 5 SUV vs Continental PremiumContact 6 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 42 road tests and 4 + 2,346 owner reviews. How we score

Check price on Amazon · Premium Contact 5 SUV Check price on Amazon · PremiumContact 6
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Continental PremiumContact 6
Tire BContinental

PremiumContact 6

Summer

± 5

Tests 84 · 42 tests Owners 75 · 2,346 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 50 in 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test (wet braking)

“My continental premium contact 6’s getting to end or ? I am using these for the last 3 years and drove 46K km on them. Treadwear indicator for 3mm is getting very close. Should I rush or let them run for maybe another 5-10K ? Read more”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. –

    Dry

    No comparison
    84
    Why this score
    SourcePremium Contact 5 SUVPremiumContact 6
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 39 tests–88
    Reviews found online–79

    PremiumContact 6: 60% × 87.6 + 40% × 78.5 = 84

  2. –

    Wet

    No comparison
    86
    Why this score
    SourcePremium Contact 5 SUVPremiumContact 6
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 40 tests–89
    Reviews found online–81

    PremiumContact 6: 60% × 89 + 40% × 80.7 = 86

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    75
    Why this score
    SourcePremium Contact 5 SUVPremiumContact 6
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 73 (est.)
    Reviews found online–77

    PremiumContact 6: 60% × 73.3 (est.) + 40% × 77.4 = 75

    No road tests of snow for PremiumContact 6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. –

    Comfort

    No comparison
    76
    Why this score
    SourcePremium Contact 5 SUVPremiumContact 6
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 10 tests–82
    Reviews found online–72

    PremiumContact 6: 40% × 81.8 + 60% × 71.5 = 76

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    55
    Why this score
    SourcePremium Contact 5 SUVPremiumContact 6
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 22 tests–43
    Reviews found online–73

    PremiumContact 6: 60% × 43 + 40% × 72.8 = 55

  6. –

    Treadwear

    No comparison
    79
    Why this score
    SourcePremium Contact 5 SUVPremiumContact 6
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 7 tests–88
    Reviews found online–65

    PremiumContact 6: 60% × 88.3 + 40% × 65 = 79

  7. –

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    78
    Why this score
    SourcePremium Contact 5 SUVPremiumContact 6
    Reviews found online–78
  8. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    74
    Why this score
    SourcePremium Contact 5 SUVPremiumContact 6
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 25 tests–74
Scores at a glance
CategoryContinental Premium Contact 5 SUVContinental PremiumContact 6
Relative Score – 79
Dry – 84
Wet – 86
Snow – 75
Comfort – 76
Noise – 55
Treadwear – 79
Handling (owners) – 78
Efficiency – 74

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Premium Contact 5 SUV

± 5

PremiumContact 6

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryPremium Contact 5 SUVPremiumContact 6ΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #3/9 2016 AMS SUV / 4x4 Tyre Test #2/50 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Premium Contact 5 SUV

Pros

  • Excellent grip in both dry and wet conditions
  • Very short dry braking distances
  • Very good steering feel and confidence in wet weather

Cons

  • Faster than expected tread wear and low mileage lifespan
  • High noise levels that increase as the tires age
  • Poor traction and usability in snow
All owner themes in the Premium Contact 5 SUV review

Tire B PremiumContact 6

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and short braking distances on both dry and wet road surfaces
  • Precise steering response and predictable handling near the limit
  • High level of high-speed stability and driver confidence

Cons

  • Faster tread wear and shorter lifespan reported by spirited drivers
  • Increased road noise and harshness on coarse or rough asphalt
  • Softer sidewalls can result in less immediate turn-in sharpness compared to dedicated ultra-high-performance tires
All owner themes in the PremiumContact 6 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Continental Premium Contact 5 SUV

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Continental PremiumContact 6

Positive

Community feedback for the Continental Premium Contact 6 is largely positive, with drivers consistently praising its strong wet and dry grip, safety, and braking performance. Some users note softer sidewalls compared to dedicated ultra-high-performance tires and express concerns regarding premium pricing or wear rates. Overall, it is viewed as a capable, high-performing summer tire that balances comfort and traction effectively.

cliotrophy.co.uk ·2023-01-23

“I had the conti PC6 on my old F56 JCW running 300bhp/324lb-ft. 17" 215/45 Found them great In the wet, although the sidewalls were rather soggy compared to the previous Michelin Supersport, which admittedly are more of a UHP tyre”
r/tires ·1 upvote ·2025-05-04

“Continental PremiumContact 6 Bought in 2020. new, first picture is front, second is back, I rotated them 2 years ago. I see some dry rot, but they could be good for this and another year? Škoda Octavia 1.9TDI 110hp, tire size 195-65-15”
r/TyreReviews ·23 upvotes ·2025-05-25

“My continental premium contact 6’s getting to end or ? I am using these for the last 3 years and drove 46K km on them. Treadwear indicator for 3mm is getting very close. Should I rush or let them run for maybe another 5-10K ? Read more”
Top themes
#wet weather grip#braking and safety#sidewall stiffness and comfort#tread wear and longevity#price and value comparison#road noise levels

Based on 16 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental Premium Contact 5 SUV B · Continental PremiumContact 6
CategorySummer Premium Touring tiresSummer
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—113
Rim diameters—15″ – 22″
Tread depth—8 - 9/32″
UTQG—280 A - AA A
Sidewall—Black Side Wall
Max pressure—50 - 51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental Premium Contact 5 SUV

Continental PremiumContact 6

Only Continental PremiumContact 6 has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.

Tire A · Continental Premium Contact 5 SUV
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Continental PremiumContact 6
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology