Tests – · none yet Owners 62 · 15 reviews
Continental Sport Contact looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Continental PremiumContact vs Continental Sport Contact — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 15 + 18 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: PremiumContact 64, Sport Contact 63.
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 60 · 18 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
65
Dry
PremiumContact +164Why this score
Source PremiumContact Sport Contact Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 64 62 PremiumContact: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 63.8 = 65
Sport Contact: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 62.1 = 64
No road tests of dry for PremiumContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for Sport Contact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
64
Wet
Sport Contact +266Why this score
Source PremiumContact Sport Contact Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 62 65 PremiumContact: 60% × 65.8 (est.) + 40% × 61.7 = 64
Sport Contact: 60% × 67.4 (est.) + 40% × 64.6 = 66
No road tests of wet for PremiumContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Sport Contact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
63
Comfort
PremiumContact +162Why this score
Source PremiumContact Sport Contact Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 59 58 PremiumContact: 40% × 67.3 (est.) + 60% × 59.3 = 63
Sport Contact: 40% × 67.1 (est.) + 60% × 58 = 62
No road tests of comfort for PremiumContact or Sport Contact. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
63
Treadwear
PremiumContact +558Why this score
Source PremiumContact Sport Contact Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 61 (est.) Reviews found online 61 53 PremiumContact: 60% × 64.4 (est.) + 40% × 61.1 = 63
Sport Contact: 60% × 61.4 (est.) + 40% × 52.6 = 58
No road tests of treadwear for PremiumContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for Sport Contact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
59
Handling (owners)
Sport Contact +362Why this score
Source PremiumContact Sport Contact Reviews found online 59 62
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental PremiumContact | Continental Sport Contact |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 64 | 63 |
| Dry | 65 | 64 |
| Wet | 64 | 66 |
| Comfort | 63 | 62 |
| Treadwear | 63 | 58 |
| Handling (owners) | 59 | 62 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
PremiumContact
Sport Contact
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A PremiumContact
Pros
- Excellent dry-weather grip and handling
- Strong longevity and tread life for many users
- High level of ride comfort
Cons
- Noticeable loss of wet-weather traction as the tire ages
- Increased road noise at higher speeds or after significant mileage
- Susceptibility to aquaplaning in standing water
Tire B Sport Contact
Pros
- Excellent dry weather grip and cornering stability
- Commendable tread life and durability for a performance-oriented tire
- Predictable and progressive handling characteristics
Cons
- Noticeable decline in wet weather performance as tread depth decreases
- Inconsistent tread wear reports ranging from 6,000 to 40,000 miles
- Increased road noise reported by some users
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental PremiumContact | B · Continental Sport Contact |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 3 | — |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 19″ | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental PremiumContact
Continental Sport Contact
Too close to call: Continental PremiumContact and Continental Sport Contact are within 2 points overall. Continental PremiumContact is stronger on treadwear. Continental PremiumContact rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 15 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Continental Sport Contact rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 18 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Continental PremiumContact scores 63 vs 58 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
PremiumContact or Sport Contact?
Which is better in the wet, PremiumContact or Sport Contact?
Neither, by our numbers: 64 vs 66 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, PremiumContact or Sport Contact?
Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 64 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, PremiumContact or Sport Contact?
Neither, by our numbers: 63 vs 62 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, PremiumContact or Sport Contact?
Continental PremiumContact, 63 vs 58 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology