Tests – · none yet Owners – · 4 reviews (needs 5)
Continental ProContact GX vs Continental ProContact RX — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 4 + 8 owner reviews. How we score
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 43 · 8 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
–
Dry
No comparison53Why this score
Source ProContact GX ProContact RX Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 58 (est.) Reviews found online – 44 ProContact RX: 60% × 58.2 (est.) + 40% × 44.2 = 53
No road tests of dry for ProContact RX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
–
Wet
No comparison55Why this score
Source ProContact GX ProContact RX Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 59 (est.) Reviews found online – 50 ProContact RX: 60% × 59.2 (est.) + 40% × 49.6 = 55
No road tests of wet for ProContact RX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
–
Snow
No comparison53Why this score
Source ProContact GX ProContact RX Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 61 (est.) Reviews found online – 41 ProContact RX: 60% × 61 (est.) + 40% × 40.5 = 53
No road tests of snow for ProContact RX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
–
Comfort
No comparison55Why this score
Source ProContact GX ProContact RX Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online – 48 ProContact RX: 40% × 64.6 (est.) + 60% × 48.1 = 55
No road tests of comfort for ProContact RX. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison60Why this score
Source ProContact GX ProContact RX Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online – 51 ProContact RX: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 50.7 = 60
No road tests of noise for ProContact RX. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Treadwear
No comparison46Why this score
Source ProContact GX ProContact RX Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 55 (est.) Reviews found online – 34 ProContact RX: 60% × 54.8 (est.) + 40% × 33.5 = 46
No road tests of treadwear for ProContact RX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
–
Handling (owners)
No comparison47Why this score
Source ProContact GX ProContact RX Reviews found online – 47
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ProContact GX | Continental ProContact RX |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | – | 53 |
| Dry | – | 53 |
| Wet | – | 55 |
| Snow | – | 53 |
| Comfort | – | 55 |
| Noise | – | 60 |
| Treadwear | – | 46 |
| Handling (owners) | – | 47 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
ProContact GX
ProContact RX
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ProContact GX
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Tire B ProContact RX
Pros
- Reasonable tread life for an OEM EV tire given proper maintenance
- Cost-effective alternative compared to other expensive OEM options
- Acceptable dry road performance under normal driving conditions
Cons
- Rapid tread wear leading to premature replacement, particularly on heavy vehicles
- Subpar grip in wet and snowy weather conditions
- Concerns regarding structural durability, including reported sidewall separation
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ProContact GX | B · Continental ProContact RX |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Season tire | All-Season tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 17 | 24 |
| Rim diameters | 17″ – 20″ | 16″ – 21″ |
| Tread depth | 8 - 10/32″ | 9/32″ |
| UTQG | 400 - 540 A A - B | 400 - 540 A - AA A - B |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | Black Side Wall |
| Max pressure | 44 - 51 psi | 50 - 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 6 | 6 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental ProContact GX
Continental ProContact RX
Only Continental ProContact RX has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology