Tests – · none yet Owners 44 · 8 reviews
Continental ProContact RX vs Goodyear Eagle LS-2 RunOnFlat — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 36 · 1 review
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
52
Dry
No comparison–Why this score
Source ProContact RX Eagle LS-2 RunOnFlat Reviews found online 44 – -
54
Wet
No comparison–Why this score
Source ProContact RX Eagle LS-2 RunOnFlat Reviews found online 49 – -
52
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source ProContact RX Eagle LS-2 RunOnFlat Reviews found online 40 – -
59
Comfort
No comparison–Why this score
Source ProContact RX Eagle LS-2 RunOnFlat Reviews found online 48 – -
60
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source ProContact RX Eagle LS-2 RunOnFlat Reviews found online 51 – -
48
Treadwear
No comparison–Why this score
Source ProContact RX Eagle LS-2 RunOnFlat Reviews found online 36 – -
45
Handling
No comparison–Why this score
Source ProContact RX Eagle LS-2 RunOnFlat Reviews found online 45 –
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ProContact RX | Goodyear Eagle LS-2 RunOnFlat |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 52 | – |
| Dry | 52 | – |
| Wet | 54 | – |
| Snow | 52 | – |
| Comfort | 59 | – |
| Noise | 60 | – |
| Treadwear | 48 | – |
| Handling | 45 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
ProContact RX
Eagle LS-2 RunOnFlat
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ProContact RX
Pros
- Reasonable tread life for an OEM EV tire given proper maintenance
- Cost-effective alternative compared to other expensive OEM options
- Acceptable dry road performance under normal driving conditions
Cons
- Rapid tread wear leading to premature replacement, particularly on heavy vehicles
- Subpar grip in wet and snowy weather conditions
- Concerns regarding structural durability, including reported sidewall separation
Tire B Eagle LS-2 RunOnFlat
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ProContact RX | B · Goodyear Eagle LS-2 RunOnFlat |
|---|---|---|
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | — |
| Sizes available | 24 | — |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 21″ | — |
| Tread depth | 9/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 400 - 540 A - AA A - B | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | — |
| Max pressure | 50 - 51 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental ProContact RX
Goodyear Eagle LS-2 RunOnFlat
Only Continental ProContact RX has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.