tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Continental ProContact RX vs Continental CrossContact LX Sport — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 8 + 562 owner reviews. How we score

CrossContact LX Sport leads, 57–53 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · CrossContact LX Sport or ProContact RX on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Continental CrossContact LX Sport
Tire BContinental

CrossContact LX Sport

All Season

± 7

Tests – · none yet Owners 48 · 562 reviews

“Issues with Continental Cross Contact LX Sport tires Anybody having premature wear on their tires? In South Texas these tires are notorious for having flaking/peeling/chunking issues on the tread. Had to replace mine after 26k, but noticed the issues much earlier than that. Not a warrantable condition but Continental did give proration based on tread depth. Used the credit towards some new Michelins. Read more”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 53

    Dry

    CrossContact LX Sport +6
    59
    Why this score
    SourceProContact RXCrossContact LX Sport
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 59 (est.)≈ 62 (est.)
    Reviews found online4555

    ProContact RX: 60% × 58.5 (est.) + 40% × 45.3 = 53

    CrossContact LX Sport: 60% × 62.5 (est.) + 40% × 54.7 = 59

    No road tests of dry for ProContact RX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for CrossContact LX Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 56

    Wet

    CrossContact LX Sport +5
    61
    Why this score
    SourceProContact RXCrossContact LX Sport
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 59 (est.)≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online5057

    ProContact RX: 60% × 59.4 (est.) + 40% × 50.2 = 56

    CrossContact LX Sport: 60% × 63.2 (est.) + 40% × 57.1 = 61

    No road tests of wet for ProContact RX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for CrossContact LX Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 52

    Snow

    CrossContact LX Sport +10
    62
    Why this score
    SourceProContact RXCrossContact LX Sport
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 60 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online4257

    ProContact RX: 60% × 59.8 (est.) + 40% × 41.5 = 52

    CrossContact LX Sport: 60% × 65.8 (est.) + 40% × 57.4 = 62

    No road tests of snow for ProContact RX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

    No road tests of snow for CrossContact LX Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 56

    Comfort

    CrossContact LX Sport +6
    62
    Why this score
    SourceProContact RXCrossContact LX Sport
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online4958

    ProContact RX: 40% × 65.5 (est.) + 60% × 49.1 = 56

    CrossContact LX Sport: 40% × 67.1 (est.) + 60% × 58 = 62

    No road tests of comfort for ProContact RX or CrossContact LX Sport. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 60

    Noise

    CrossContact LX Sport +4
    64
    Why this score
    SourceProContact RXCrossContact LX Sport
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online5161

    ProContact RX: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 51.3 = 60

    CrossContact LX Sport: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 61 = 64

    No road tests of noise for ProContact RX or CrossContact LX Sport. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 46

    Treadwear

    ProContact RX +7
    39
    Why this score
    SourceProContact RXCrossContact LX Sport
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 55 (est.)≈ 51 (est.)
    Reviews found online3323

    ProContact RX: 60% × 54.6 (est.) + 40% × 33.4 = 46

    CrossContact LX Sport: 60% × 50.8 (est.) + 40% × 22.5 = 39

    No road tests of treadwear for ProContact RX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for CrossContact LX Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 48

    Handling (owners)

    ProContact RX +2
    46
    Why this score
    SourceProContact RXCrossContact LX Sport
    Reviews found online4846
Scores at a glance
CategoryContinental ProContact RXContinental CrossContact LX Sport
Relative Score 53 57
Dry 53 59
Wet 56 61
Snow 52 62
Comfort 56 62
Noise 60 64
Treadwear 46 39
Handling (owners) 48 46

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

ProContact RX

± 7

CrossContact LX Sport

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ProContact RX

Pros

  • Reasonable tread life for an OEM EV tire given proper maintenance
  • Cost-effective alternative compared to other expensive OEM options
  • Acceptable dry road performance under normal driving conditions

Cons

  • Rapid tread wear leading to premature replacement, particularly on heavy vehicles
  • Subpar grip in wet and snowy weather conditions
  • Concerns regarding structural durability, including reported sidewall separation
All owner themes in the ProContact RX review

Tire B CrossContact LX Sport

Pros

  • Low road noise and exceptional cabin comfort
  • Strong handling and reliable grip in wet and dry conditions
  • Confident performance in light snow and winter weather

Cons

  • Disappointing tread life and faster-than-expected wear
  • Occasional reports of reduced traction in heavy mud or specific slick conditions
  • Higher price point relative to the longevity experienced by some drivers
All owner themes in the CrossContact LX Sport review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Continental ProContact RX

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Continental CrossContact LX Sport

Mixed

Community opinion on the Continental Cross Contact LX Sport is mixed, with some drivers praising its comfort, balance of control, and low road noise. However, many owners express dissatisfaction with rapid tread wear, flaking or chunking, poor wet traction, and shallow initial tread depth. Several users consider replacing them early with options like Michelin CrossClimate or Defender models.

bobistheoilguy.com ·3 upvotes ·2022-10-17

“A broken screw went partially into the tire tread, cutting one of the metal wires / belts in the casing. The tire is not losing air. I am concerned the damaged wire belt could lead to a tire failure. The open divot, deeper than the tire tread, also concerns me since it can get packed with debris, damage the other intact wire, or open the hole even more or further puncturing it. Tire is 2 years old with 17k miles so it's in great shape. Continental Cross Contact LX Sport 245/50 R20. This is on my wife's Pilot so I want her to have a reliable tire with no possibility of having a failure due to this damage, if that is likely here. What do you guys think?”
r/ModelX ·1 upvote ·2026-09-18

“You don’t want to be too cheap with harder rubber material because they lack stability. I just replaced mine with Continental Cross Contact LX Sport T1 from America Tires with the best balance between comfort and control. Slightly cheaper than Tesla Service Center. You can try the Hankook Evo ION designed specifically for EV but you only have half the warranty mileage due to staggered tires configuration on the MX.”
r/tires ·1 upvote ·2026-09-27

“Gouge on sidewall It’s a continental cross contact LX sport 235/65 R18. Got them last year but hit a sharp curb the other day. Not sure if I’m seeing any cords, there’s some white streaks deep in the gouge but it all seems in tact. Just need to drive this car for 3 more days, is it safe?”
Top themes
#premature tread wear#wet weather traction#OEM tire replacement#tire inflation pressure#ride comfort and road noise#EV efficiency comparison

Based on 26 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ProContact RX B · Continental CrossContact LX Sport
CategoryAll-Season tireAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Sizes available2439
Rim diameters16″ – 21″16″ – 22″
Tread depth9/32″9/32″
UTQG400 - 540 A - AA A - B480 A A
SidewallBlack Side WallBlackwall
Max pressure50 - 51 psi51 psi
Sizes in common66

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental ProContact RX

Continental CrossContact LX Sport

Narrow edge: Continental CrossContact LX Sport — better snow, dry and comfort. Pick the Continental ProContact RX if treadwear matters most to you. Continental ProContact RX rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 8 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Continental CrossContact LX Sport scores 62 vs 52 on snow.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Continental ProContact RX scores 46 vs 39 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Continental CrossContact LX Sport scores 59 vs 53 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Continental CrossContact LX Sport scores 62 vs 56 on comfort.

Tire A · Continental ProContact RX
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Continental CrossContact LX Sport
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ProContact RX or CrossContact LX Sport?

Which is better in the wet, ProContact RX or CrossContact LX Sport?

Continental CrossContact LX Sport, 61 vs 56 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, ProContact RX or CrossContact LX Sport?

Continental CrossContact LX Sport, 59 vs 53 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, ProContact RX or CrossContact LX Sport?

Continental CrossContact LX Sport, 62 vs 52 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, ProContact RX or CrossContact LX Sport?

Continental CrossContact LX Sport, 64 vs 60 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, ProContact RX or CrossContact LX Sport?

Continental CrossContact LX Sport, 62 vs 56 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, ProContact RX or CrossContact LX Sport?

Continental ProContact RX, 46 vs 39 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology