tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Continental ProContact RX vs Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 2 road tests and 8 + 18 owner reviews. How we score

Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV is ahead, 75–53

Check price on Amazon · Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV or ProContact RX on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV
Tire BNokian

Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV

Winter

± 6

Tests 72 · 2 tests Owners 80 · 18 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 8 in 2025 Friction Winter Tyre Test (wet braking)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 53

    Dry

    Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV +21
    74
    Why this score
    SourceProContact RXHakkapeliitta R5 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 58 (est.)74
    Reviews found online4474

    ProContact RX: 60% × 58.2 (est.) + 40% × 44.2 = 53

    Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV: 60% × 73.7 + 40% × 74.3 = 74

    No road tests of dry for ProContact RX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 55

    Wet

    Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV +20
    75
    Why this score
    SourceProContact RXHakkapeliitta R5 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 59 (est.)69
    Reviews found online5084

    ProContact RX: 60% × 59.2 (est.) + 40% × 49.6 = 55

    Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV: 60% × 68.6 + 40% × 83.5 = 75

    No road tests of wet for ProContact RX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 53

    Snow

    Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV +26
    79
    Why this score
    SourceProContact RXHakkapeliitta R5 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 61 (est.)75
    Reviews found online4185

    ProContact RX: 60% × 61 (est.) + 40% × 40.5 = 53

    Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV: 60% × 74.8 + 40% × 84.7 = 79

    No road tests of snow for ProContact RX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 55

    Comfort

    Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV +21
    76
    Why this score
    SourceProContact RXHakkapeliitta R5 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online4879

    ProContact RX: 40% × 64.5 (est.) + 60% × 48.1 = 55

    Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV: 40% × 70.7 (est.) + 60% × 79.1 = 76

    No road tests of comfort for ProContact RX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 60

    Noise

    Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV +13
    73
    Why this score
    SourceProContact RXHakkapeliitta R5 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 66 (est.)66
    Reviews found online5184

    ProContact RX: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 50.7 = 60

    Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV: 60% × 65.7 + 40% × 83.5 = 73

    No road tests of noise for ProContact RX. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 46

    Treadwear

    Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV +28
    74
    Why this score
    SourceProContact RXHakkapeliitta R5 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 55 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online3478

    ProContact RX: 60% × 54.6 (est.) + 40% × 33.6 = 46

    Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV: 60% × 70.7 (est.) + 40% × 78 = 74

    No road tests of treadwear for ProContact RX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 47

    Handling (owners)

    Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV +32
    79
    Why this score
    SourceProContact RXHakkapeliitta R5 SUV
    Reviews found online4779
  8. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    72
    Why this score
    SourceProContact RXHakkapeliitta R5 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests–72
Scores at a glance
CategoryContinental ProContact RXNokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV
Relative Score 53 75
Dry 53 74
Wet 55 75
Snow 53 79
Comfort 55 76
Noise 60 73
Treadwear 46 74
Handling (owners) 47 79
Efficiency – 72

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

ProContact RX

± 6

Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ProContact RX

Pros

  • Reasonable tread life for an OEM EV tire given proper maintenance
  • Cost-effective alternative compared to other expensive OEM options
  • Acceptable dry road performance under normal driving conditions

Cons

  • Rapid tread wear leading to premature replacement, particularly on heavy vehicles
  • Subpar grip in wet and snowy weather conditions
  • Concerns regarding structural durability, including reported sidewall separation
All owner themes in the ProContact RX review

Tire B Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and traction on snow and ice
  • Significantly quieter than previous models and studded alternatives
  • Stable and predictable handling with a firm, confident ride on dry and wet pavement

Cons

  • Higher price point compared to some other tire options
  • Slightly firmer ride compared to softer alternatives like Bridgestone Blizzaks
  • Some minor compromises in ultimate dry and wet grip typical of soft-compound winter tires
All owner themes in the Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ProContact RX B · Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV
CategoryAll-Season tireWinter
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Sizes available2470
Rim diameters16″ – 21″16″ – 22″
Tread depth9/32″12/32″
UTQG400 - 540 A - AA A - B—
SidewallBlack Side WallBlack Side Wall
Max pressure50 - 51 psi47 - 51 psi
Sizes in common88

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental ProContact RX

Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV

Winner: Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV — better handling, treadwear and snow. It leads or ties in every category we score. Continental ProContact RX rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 8 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV scores 79 vs 47 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV scores 74 vs 46 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV scores 79 vs 53 on snow.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV scores 74 vs 53 on dry.

Tire A · Continental ProContact RX
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ProContact RX or Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV?

Which is better in the wet, ProContact RX or Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV?

Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV, 75 vs 55 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, ProContact RX or Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV?

Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV, 74 vs 53 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, ProContact RX or Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV?

Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV, 79 vs 53 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, ProContact RX or Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV?

Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV, 73 vs 60 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, ProContact RX or Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV?

Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV, 76 vs 55 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, ProContact RX or Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV?

Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV, 74 vs 46 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology