Dunlop Direzza DZ101 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Continental ProContact vs Dunlop Direzza DZ101 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 12 + 8 owner reviews. How we score

Direzza DZ101 is ahead, 66–53

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Continental ProContact

ProContact

All Season

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 45 · 12 reviews

Dunlop Direzza DZ101
Tire BDunlop

Direzza DZ101

Summer

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 64 · 8 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 52

    Dry

    Direzza DZ101 +16
    68
    Why this score
    SourceProContactDirezza DZ101
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 58 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online4368

    ProContact: 60% × 57.7 (est.) + 40% × 43 = 52

    Direzza DZ101: 60% × 67.9 (est.) + 40% × 67.9 = 68

    No road tests of dry for ProContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for Direzza DZ101. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 57

    Wet

    Direzza DZ101 +10
    67
    Why this score
    SourceProContactDirezza DZ101
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 60 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online5265

    ProContact: 60% × 60.2 (est.) + 40% × 51.5 = 57

    Direzza DZ101: 60% × 67.7 (est.) + 40% × 65.2 = 67

    No road tests of wet for ProContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Direzza DZ101. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 52

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceProContactDirezza DZ101
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 61 (est.)–
    Reviews found online39–

    ProContact: 60% × 60.6 (est.) + 40% × 39.3 = 52

    No road tests of snow for ProContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 48

    Comfort

    Direzza DZ101 +17
    65
    Why this score
    SourceProContactDirezza DZ101
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 63 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online3963

    ProContact: 40% × 62.6 (est.) + 60% × 38.6 = 48

    Direzza DZ101: 40% × 67.6 (est.) + 60% × 63.4 = 65

    No road tests of comfort for ProContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Direzza DZ101. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 53

    Treadwear

    Direzza DZ101 +8
    61
    Why this score
    SourceProContactDirezza DZ101
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 58 (est.)≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online4458

    ProContact: 60% × 58.3 (est.) + 40% × 43.8 = 53

    Direzza DZ101: 60% × 63.3 (est.) + 40% × 57.6 = 61

    No road tests of treadwear for ProContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Direzza DZ101. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  6. 45

    Handling (owners)

    Direzza DZ101 +23
    68
    Why this score
    SourceProContactDirezza DZ101
    Reviews found online4568
Scores at a glance
Continental ProContact vs Dunlop Direzza DZ101: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental ProContactDunlop Direzza DZ101
Relative Score 53 66
Dry 52 68
Wet 57 67
Snow 52 –
Comfort 48 65
Treadwear 53 61
Handling (owners) 45 68

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

ProContact

± 8

Direzza DZ101

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ProContact

Pros

  • Predictable and safe handling on dry pavement
  • Competent performance in high-heat conditions
  • Generally comfortable ride quality for calm, daily driving

Cons

  • Significant increase in road noise as the tire ages
  • Premature tread wear and limited mileage lifespan
  • Structural reliability issues, including sidewall bubbles and flat-spotting
All owner themes in the ProContact review

Tire B Direzza DZ101

Pros

  • Highly competitive price point
  • Aggressive and attractive tread design
  • Surprising levels of ride comfort and low noise

Cons

  • Short tread life and rapid wear
  • Inconsistent performance and grip quality between different sets
  • Uninspiring wet weather traction for aggressive driving
All owner themes in the Direzza DZ101 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ProContact B · Dunlop Direzza DZ101
CategoryAll SeasonSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
UTQG—300 A A

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental ProContact

Dunlop Direzza DZ101

Winner: Dunlop Direzza DZ101 — better handling, comfort and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Continental ProContact rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 12 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Dunlop Direzza DZ101 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 8 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Dunlop Direzza DZ101 scores 68 vs 45 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Dunlop Direzza DZ101 scores 65 vs 48 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Dunlop Direzza DZ101 scores 68 vs 52 on dry.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Dunlop Direzza DZ101 scores 67 vs 57 on wet.

Tire A · Continental ProContact
Tire B · Dunlop Direzza DZ101

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ProContact or Direzza DZ101?

Which is better in the wet, ProContact or Direzza DZ101?

Dunlop Direzza DZ101, 67 vs 57 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, ProContact or Direzza DZ101?

Dunlop Direzza DZ101, 68 vs 52 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, ProContact or Direzza DZ101?

Dunlop Direzza DZ101, 65 vs 48 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, ProContact or Direzza DZ101?

Dunlop Direzza DZ101, 61 vs 53 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology