Tests – · none yet Owners 43 · 12 reviews
Continental ProContact vs Laufenn S FIT AS — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
S FIT AS is ahead, 63–51
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
49
Dry
S FIT AS +1564Why this score
Source ProContact S FIT AS Reviews found online 39 62 -
56
Wet
S FIT AS +662Why this score
Source ProContact S FIT AS Reviews found online 51 59 -
51
Snow
S FIT AS +152Why this score
Source ProContact S FIT AS Reviews found online 38 41 -
53
Comfort
S FIT AS +1366Why this score
Source ProContact S FIT AS Reviews found online 37 63 -
–
Noise
No comparison64Why this score
Source ProContact S FIT AS Reviews found online – 61 -
54
Treadwear
S FIT AS +1569Why this score
Source ProContact S FIT AS Professional tests (TWG score) – 74 Reviews found online 45 61 -
41
Handling
S FIT AS +2061Why this score
Source ProContact S FIT AS Reviews found online 41 61
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ProContact | Laufenn S FIT AS |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 51 | 63 |
| Dry | 49 | 64 |
| Wet | 56 | 62 |
| Snow | 51 | 52 |
| Comfort | 53 | 66 |
| Noise | – | 64 |
| Treadwear | 54 | 69 |
| Handling | 41 | 61 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
ProContact
S FIT AS
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ProContact
Pros
- Predictable and safe handling on dry pavement
- Competent performance in high-heat conditions
- Generally comfortable ride quality for calm, daily driving
Cons
- Significant increase in road noise as the tire ages
- Premature tread wear and limited mileage lifespan
- Structural reliability issues, including sidewall bubbles and flat-spotting
Tire B S FIT AS
Pros
- Exceptional value for the price compared to ultra-budget alternatives
- Very quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Good grip and handling in dry conditions
Cons
- Subpar wet-weather grip, with tendencies to lose traction easily under acceleration
- Wet performance degrades noticeably after 50% wear
- Concerns regarding rapid tread wear or limited lifespan
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ProContact | B · Laufenn S FIT AS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental ProContact
Laufenn S FIT AS
Winner: Laufenn S FIT AS — better handling, dry and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Laufenn S FIT AS scores 61 vs 41 on handling.
Laufenn S FIT AS scores 64 vs 49 on dry.
Laufenn S FIT AS scores 69 vs 54 on treadwear.
Laufenn S FIT AS scores 66 vs 53 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.