Tests – · none yet Owners 45 · 12 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Continental ProContact vs Laufenn S FIT AS — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 12 + 16 owner reviews. How we score
S FIT AS is ahead, 59–53
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
52
Dry
S FIT AS +860Why this score
Source ProContact S FIT AS Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 58 (est.) ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 43 55 ProContact: 60% × 57.7 (est.) + 40% × 43 = 52
S FIT AS: 60% × 62.7 (est.) + 40% × 55.3 = 60
No road tests of dry for ProContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for S FIT AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
57
Wet
S FIT AS +158Why this score
Source ProContact S FIT AS Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 60 (est.) ≈ 61 (est.) Reviews found online 52 54 ProContact: 60% × 60.2 (est.) + 40% × 51.5 = 57
S FIT AS: 60% × 61.4 (est.) + 40% × 53.7 = 58
No road tests of wet for ProContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for S FIT AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
52
Snow
ProContact +250Why this score
Source ProContact S FIT AS Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 61 (est.) ≈ 60 (est.) Reviews found online 39 37 ProContact: 60% × 60.6 (est.) + 40% × 39.3 = 52
S FIT AS: 60% × 59.7 (est.) + 40% × 36.6 = 50
No road tests of snow for ProContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for S FIT AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
48
Comfort
S FIT AS +1361Why this score
Source ProContact S FIT AS Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 63 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 39 58 ProContact: 40% × 62.6 (est.) + 60% × 38.6 = 48
S FIT AS: 40% × 66.5 (est.) + 60% × 57.9 = 61
No road tests of comfort for ProContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for S FIT AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
53
Treadwear
S FIT AS +1467Why this score
Source ProContact S FIT AS Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 58 (est.) 75 Reviews found online 44 56 ProContact: 60% × 58.3 (est.) + 40% × 43.8 = 53
S FIT AS: 60% × 74.9 + 40% × 56.4 = 67
No road tests of treadwear for ProContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
45
Handling (owners)
S FIT AS +1055Why this score
Source ProContact S FIT AS Reviews found online 45 55
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ProContact | Laufenn S FIT AS |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 53 | 59 |
| Dry | 52 | 60 |
| Wet | 57 | 58 |
| Snow | 52 | 50 |
| Comfort | 48 | 61 |
| Treadwear | 53 | 67 |
| Handling (owners) | 45 | 55 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
53
/ 100
ProContact
59
/ 100
S FIT AS
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ProContact
Pros
- Predictable and safe handling on dry pavement
- Competent performance in high-heat conditions
- Generally comfortable ride quality for calm, daily driving
Cons
- Significant increase in road noise as the tire ages
- Premature tread wear and limited mileage lifespan
- Structural reliability issues, including sidewall bubbles and flat-spotting
Tire B S FIT AS
Pros
- Exceptional value for the price compared to ultra-budget alternatives
- Very quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Good grip and handling in dry conditions
Cons
- Subpar wet-weather grip, with tendencies to lose traction easily under acceleration
- Wet performance degrades noticeably after 50% wear
- Concerns regarding rapid tread wear or limited lifespan
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ProContact | B · Laufenn S FIT AS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| UTQG | — | 500 A A |
Which one should you actually buy?
53
/ 100
Continental ProContact
59
/ 100
Laufenn S FIT AS
Winner: Laufenn S FIT AS — better treadwear, comfort and handling. Where the Continental ProContact is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Continental ProContact rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 12 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Laufenn S FIT AS rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 16 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Laufenn S FIT AS scores 67 vs 53 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Laufenn S FIT AS scores 61 vs 48 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Laufenn S FIT AS scores 55 vs 45 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Laufenn S FIT AS scores 60 vs 52 on dry.
Tire A · Continental ProContact
Tire B · Laufenn S FIT AS
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ProContact or S FIT AS?
Which is better in the wet, ProContact or S FIT AS?
Neither, by our numbers: 57 vs 58 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, ProContact or S FIT AS?
Laufenn S FIT AS, 60 vs 52 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, ProContact or S FIT AS?
Neither, by our numbers: 52 vs 50 on the snow score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, ProContact or S FIT AS?
Laufenn S FIT AS, 61 vs 48 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, ProContact or S FIT AS?
Laufenn S FIT AS, 67 vs 53 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology