tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Continental ProContact vs Michelin CrossClimate+ — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 13 road tests and 12 + 120 owner reviews. How we score

CrossClimate+ is ahead, 80–53

Check price on Amazon · CrossClimate+ or ProContact on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Continental ProContact
Tire AContinental

ProContact

All Season

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 45 · 12 reviews

Michelin CrossClimate+
Tire BMichelin

CrossClimate+

All Season

± 5

Tests 81 · 13 tests Owners 78 · 120 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 15 in 2019 Summer and All Season Tyre Test (dry handling)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 52

    Dry

    CrossClimate+ +35
    87
    Why this score
    SourceProContactCrossClimate+
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 13 tests≈ 58 (est.)94
    Reviews found online4377

    ProContact: 60% × 57.7 (est.) + 40% × 43 = 52

    CrossClimate+: 60% × 93.9 + 40% × 77.4 = 87

    No road tests of dry for ProContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 57

    Wet

    CrossClimate+ +24
    81
    Why this score
    SourceProContactCrossClimate+
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 13 tests≈ 60 (est.)81
    Reviews found online5281

    ProContact: 60% × 60.2 (est.) + 40% × 51.5 = 57

    CrossClimate+: 60% × 80.8 + 40% × 81.2 = 81

    No road tests of wet for ProContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 52

    Snow

    CrossClimate+ +16
    68
    Why this score
    SourceProContactCrossClimate+
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 9 tests≈ 61 (est.)65
    Reviews found online3973

    ProContact: 60% × 60.6 (est.) + 40% × 39.3 = 52

    CrossClimate+: 60% × 65.1 + 40% × 72.8 = 68

    No road tests of snow for ProContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 48

    Comfort

    CrossClimate+ +27
    75
    Why this score
    SourceProContactCrossClimate+
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 63 (est.)71
    Reviews found online3977

    ProContact: 40% × 62.6 (est.) + 60% × 38.6 = 48

    CrossClimate+: 40% × 70.9 + 60% × 77.1 = 75

    No road tests of comfort for ProContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    67
    Why this score
    SourceProContactCrossClimate+
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 9 tests–68
    Reviews found online–≈ 66 (est.)

    CrossClimate+: 60% × 67.6 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 67

    No owner ratings of noise for CrossClimate+. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 53

    Treadwear

    CrossClimate+ +29
    82
    Why this score
    SourceProContactCrossClimate+
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 58 (est.)83
    Reviews found online4480

    ProContact: 60% × 58.3 (est.) + 40% × 43.8 = 53

    CrossClimate+: 60% × 83.2 + 40% × 79.7 = 82

    No road tests of treadwear for ProContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 45

    Handling (owners)

    CrossClimate+ +27
    72
    Why this score
    SourceProContactCrossClimate+
    Reviews found online4572
  8. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    74
    Why this score
    SourceProContactCrossClimate+
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 8 tests–74
Scores at a glance
CategoryContinental ProContactMichelin CrossClimate+
Relative Score 53 80
Dry 52 87
Wet 57 81
Snow 52 68
Comfort 48 75
Noise – 67
Treadwear 53 82
Handling (owners) 45 72
Efficiency – 74

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

ProContact

± 5

CrossClimate+

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ProContact

Pros

  • Predictable and safe handling on dry pavement
  • Competent performance in high-heat conditions
  • Generally comfortable ride quality for calm, daily driving

Cons

  • Significant increase in road noise as the tire ages
  • Premature tread wear and limited mileage lifespan
  • Structural reliability issues, including sidewall bubbles and flat-spotting
All owner themes in the ProContact review

Tire B CrossClimate+

Pros

  • Strong snow and cold-weather traction for an all-season tyre, with many owners reporting winter-tyre-like confidence on snow, slush and hills, including on front-wheel-drive cars.
  • Excellent dry handling and steering response with precise, summer-tyre-like feel, along with generally very good wet grip and braking.
  • Long tread life: many reports of 30,000–55,000+ km or miles with low wear, including taxi and van use and 4-year/50,000-mile ownership.

Cons

  • Performance degradation with age: several owners report grip (wet and snow), noise and ride deteriorating after about 1–2 years, with hardening or cracking of the rubber in some cases.
  • Limitations on ice, packed snow and deep or steep snow, where some owners found them inferior to dedicated winter tyres or to rivals such as the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons.
  • Wet-weather concerns for some, including aquaplaning, being pulled around by standing water, and scary steering feel as the tyres aged.
All owner themes in the CrossClimate+ review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ProContact B · Michelin CrossClimate+
CategoryAll SeasonAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—63
Rim diameters—13″ – 19″

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental ProContact

Michelin CrossClimate+

Winner: Michelin CrossClimate+ — better dry, treadwear and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Continental ProContact rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 12 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin CrossClimate+ scores 87 vs 52 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Michelin CrossClimate+ scores 82 vs 53 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Michelin CrossClimate+ scores 75 vs 48 on comfort.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin CrossClimate+ scores 72 vs 45 on handling.

Tire A · Continental ProContact
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Michelin CrossClimate+
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ProContact or CrossClimate+?

Which is better in the wet, ProContact or CrossClimate+?

Michelin CrossClimate+, 81 vs 57 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, ProContact or CrossClimate+?

Michelin CrossClimate+, 87 vs 52 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, ProContact or CrossClimate+?

Michelin CrossClimate+, 68 vs 52 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, ProContact or CrossClimate+?

Michelin CrossClimate+, 75 vs 48 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, ProContact or CrossClimate+?

Michelin CrossClimate+, 82 vs 53 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology