Tests – · none yet Owners 43 · 12 reviews
Continental ProContact vs Toyo Proxes ST — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 12 + 14 owner reviews. How we score
Proxes ST is ahead, 71–52
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
50
Dry
Proxes ST +2272Why this score
Source ProContact Proxes ST Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 56 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 39 75 ProContact: 60% × 56.3 (est.) + 40% × 39.4 = 50
Proxes ST: 60% × 70.5 (est.) + 40% × 74.7 = 72
No road tests of dry for ProContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Proxes ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
56
Wet
Proxes ST +1975Why this score
Source ProContact Proxes ST Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 59 (est.) ≈ 74 (est.) Reviews found online 51 77 ProContact: 60% × 59.4 (est.) + 40% × 51.3 = 56
Proxes ST: 60% × 73.6 (est.) + 40% × 76.6 = 75
No road tests of wet for ProContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Proxes ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
50
Snow
Proxes ST +1666Why this score
Source ProContact Proxes ST Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 59 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 37 64 ProContact: 60% × 59.1 (est.) + 40% × 37.3 = 50
Proxes ST: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 63.6 = 66
No road tests of snow for ProContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
No road tests of snow for Proxes ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
52
Comfort
Proxes ST +2072Why this score
Source ProContact Proxes ST Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 63 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 36 74 ProContact: 60% × 63.4 (est.) + 40% × 35.9 = 52
Proxes ST: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 74.1 = 72
No road tests of comfort for ProContact or Proxes ST. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
53
Treadwear
Proxes ST +1669Why this score
Source ProContact Proxes ST Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 59 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 45 72 ProContact: 60% × 59.2 (est.) + 40% × 44.7 = 53
Proxes ST: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 71.7 = 69
No road tests of treadwear for ProContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Proxes ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
41
Handling (owners)
Proxes ST +3071Why this score
Source ProContact Proxes ST Reviews found online 41 71
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ProContact | Toyo Proxes ST |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 52 | 71 |
| Dry | 50 | 72 |
| Wet | 56 | 75 |
| Snow | 50 | 66 |
| Comfort | 52 | 72 |
| Treadwear | 53 | 69 |
| Handling (owners) | 41 | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
ProContact
Proxes ST
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ProContact
Pros
- Predictable and safe handling on dry pavement
- Competent performance in high-heat conditions
- Generally comfortable ride quality for calm, daily driving
Cons
- Significant increase in road noise as the tire ages
- Premature tread wear and limited mileage lifespan
- Structural reliability issues, including sidewall bubbles and flat-spotting
Tire B Proxes ST
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and long-term durability
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality compared to other brands and run-flats
- Strong dry and wet grip with good resistance to aquaplaning
Cons
- Poor performance and limited traction in snow and ice
- A small number of users experienced disappointing treadwear and longevity
- Conflicting feedback regarding wet grip, with isolated reports of poor performance
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ProContact | B · Toyo Proxes ST |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental ProContact
Toyo Proxes ST
Winner: Toyo Proxes ST — better handling, dry and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Continental ProContact rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 12 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Toyo Proxes ST rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 14 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Toyo Proxes ST scores 71 vs 41 on handling.
Toyo Proxes ST scores 72 vs 50 on dry.
Toyo Proxes ST scores 72 vs 52 on comfort.
Toyo Proxes ST scores 75 vs 56 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ProContact or Proxes ST?
Which is better in the wet, ProContact or Proxes ST?
Toyo Proxes ST, 75 vs 56 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, ProContact or Proxes ST?
Toyo Proxes ST, 72 vs 50 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, ProContact or Proxes ST?
Toyo Proxes ST, 66 vs 50 on our snow score.
Which is more comfortable, ProContact or Proxes ST?
Toyo Proxes ST, 72 vs 52 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, ProContact or Proxes ST?
Toyo Proxes ST, 69 vs 53 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology