Head-to-head Updated

Continental ProContact vs Vredestein Wintrac Pro — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 30 road tests and 12 + 31 owner reviews. How we score

Wintrac Pro is ahead, 79–53

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Continental ProContact

ProContact

All Season

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 45 · 12 reviews

Vredestein Wintrac Pro

Wintrac Pro

Winter

± 5

Tests 72 · 30 tests Owners 83 · 31 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 16 in 2024 ADAC 17 inch Winter Tyre Test (snow traction)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 52

    Dry

    Wintrac Pro +25
    77
    Why this score
    SourceProContactWintrac Pro
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 26 tests≈ 58 (est.)74
    Reviews found online4483

    ProContact: 60% × 57.8 (est.) + 40% × 43.7 = 52

    Wintrac Pro: 60% × 73.6 + 40% × 83.2 = 77

    No road tests of dry for ProContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 57

    Wet

    Wintrac Pro +31
    88
    Why this score
    SourceProContactWintrac Pro
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 30 tests≈ 60 (est.)87
    Reviews found online5288

    ProContact: 60% × 60.3 (est.) + 40% × 51.8 = 57

    Wintrac Pro: 60% × 87.3 + 40% × 88.1 = 88

    No road tests of wet for ProContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 51

    Snow

    Wintrac Pro +28
    79
    Why this score
    SourceProContactWintrac Pro
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 30 tests≈ 59 (est.)78
    Reviews found online4080

    ProContact: 60% × 59.1 (est.) + 40% × 39.5 = 51

    Wintrac Pro: 60% × 78.3 + 40% × 79.5 = 79

    No road tests of snow for ProContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 49

    Comfort

    Wintrac Pro +24
    73
    Why this score
    SourceProContactWintrac Pro
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 64 (est.)60
    Reviews found online3981

    ProContact: 40% × 63.6 (est.) + 60% × 39.3 = 49

    Wintrac Pro: 40% × 60.4 + 60% × 81.2 = 73

    No road tests of comfort for ProContact. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    60
    Why this score
    SourceProContactWintrac Pro
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 25 tests–56
    Reviews found online–≈ 67 (est.)

    Wintrac Pro: 60% × 55.7 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 60

    No owner ratings of noise for Wintrac Pro. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 52

    Treadwear

    Wintrac Pro +14
    66
    Why this score
    SourceProContactWintrac Pro
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 6 tests≈ 58 (est.)56
    Reviews found online4480

    ProContact: 60% × 58.3 (est.) + 40% × 43.6 = 52

    Wintrac Pro: 60% × 55.6 + 40% × 80.4 = 66

    No road tests of treadwear for ProContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 46

    Handling (owners)

    Wintrac Pro +36
    82
    Why this score
    SourceProContactWintrac Pro
    Reviews found online4682
  8. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    45
    Why this score
    SourceProContactWintrac Pro
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 25 tests–45
Scores at a glance
Continental ProContact vs Vredestein Wintrac Pro: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental ProContactVredestein Wintrac Pro
Relative Score 53 79
Dry 52 77
Wet 57 88
Snow 51 79
Comfort 49 73
Noise – 60
Treadwear 52 66
Handling (owners) 46 82
Efficiency – 45

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

ProContact

± 5

Wintrac Pro

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ProContact

Pros

  • Predictable and safe handling on dry pavement
  • Competent performance in high-heat conditions
  • Generally comfortable ride quality for calm, daily driving

Cons

  • Significant increase in road noise as the tire ages
  • Premature tread wear and limited mileage lifespan
  • Structural reliability issues, including sidewall bubbles and flat-spotting
All owner themes in the ProContact review

Tire B Wintrac Pro

Pros

  • Exceptional wet-weather grip and aquaplaning resistance
  • High-speed stability and responsive steering feedback
  • Strong performance in cold, dry conditions

Cons

  • Noticeable increase in fuel consumption/rolling resistance
  • Potential for accelerated tread wear if used in warmer temperatures
  • Occasional reports of noise or 'squealing' during hard cornering in dry conditions
All owner themes in the Wintrac Pro review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ProContact B · Vredestein Wintrac Pro
CategoryAll SeasonWinter
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—119
Rim diameters—17″ – 22″

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental ProContact

Vredestein Wintrac Pro

Winner: Vredestein Wintrac Pro — better handling, wet and snow. It leads or ties in every category we score. Continental ProContact rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 12 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Vredestein Wintrac Pro scores 82 vs 46 on handling.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Vredestein Wintrac Pro scores 88 vs 57 on wet.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Vredestein Wintrac Pro scores 79 vs 51 on snow.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Vredestein Wintrac Pro scores 77 vs 52 on dry.

Tire A · Continental ProContact
Tire B · Vredestein Wintrac Pro

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ProContact or Wintrac Pro?

Which is better in the wet, ProContact or Wintrac Pro?

Vredestein Wintrac Pro, 88 vs 57 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, ProContact or Wintrac Pro?

Vredestein Wintrac Pro, 77 vs 52 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, ProContact or Wintrac Pro?

Vredestein Wintrac Pro, 79 vs 51 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, ProContact or Wintrac Pro?

Vredestein Wintrac Pro, 73 vs 49 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, ProContact or Wintrac Pro?

Vredestein Wintrac Pro, 66 vs 52 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology