Tests – · none yet Owners 45 · 12 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Continental ProContact vs Yokohama Advan Sport AS — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 2 road tests and 12 + 15 owner reviews. How we score
Advan Sport AS is ahead, 59–53
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 61 · 2 tests Owners 60 · 15 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 19 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires (tested tread life (miles))
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
52
Dry
ProContact +349Why this score
Source ProContact Advan Sport AS Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 58 (est.) 42 Reviews found online 43 60 ProContact: 60% × 57.7 (est.) + 40% × 43.1 = 52
Advan Sport AS: 60% × 41.9 + 40% × 59.8 = 49
No road tests of dry for ProContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
57
Wet
Advan Sport AS +360Why this score
Source ProContact Advan Sport AS Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 60 (est.) 58 Reviews found online 51 64 ProContact: 60% × 60.1 (est.) + 40% × 51.4 = 57
Advan Sport AS: 60% × 57.6 + 40% × 64.1 = 60
No road tests of wet for ProContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
52
Snow
Advan Sport AS +557Why this score
Source ProContact Advan Sport AS Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 61 (est.) ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 39 47 ProContact: 60% × 60.6 (est.) + 40% × 39.4 = 52
Advan Sport AS: 60% × 63.1 (est.) + 40% × 47.4 = 57
No road tests of snow for ProContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for Advan Sport AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
48
Comfort
Advan Sport AS +1563Why this score
Source ProContact Advan Sport AS Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 63 (est.) 62 Reviews found online 39 64 ProContact: 40% × 62.6 (est.) + 60% × 38.5 = 48
Advan Sport AS: 40% × 61.7 + 60% × 63.8 = 63
No road tests of comfort for ProContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
–
Noise
No comparison69Why this score
Source ProContact Advan Sport AS Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 72 Reviews found online – 63 Advan Sport AS: 60% × 72.4 + 40% × 63.1 = 69
-
53
Treadwear
Advan Sport AS +2073Why this score
Source ProContact Advan Sport AS Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 58 (est.) 81 Reviews found online 44 60 ProContact: 60% × 58.4 (est.) + 40% × 43.7 = 53
Advan Sport AS: 60% × 80.9 + 40% × 60 = 73
No road tests of treadwear for ProContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
45
Handling (owners)
Advan Sport AS +1762Why this score
Source ProContact Advan Sport AS Reviews found online 45 62
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ProContact | Yokohama Advan Sport AS |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 53 | 59 |
| Dry | 52 | 49 |
| Wet | 57 | 60 |
| Snow | 52 | 57 |
| Comfort | 48 | 63 |
| Noise | – | 69 |
| Treadwear | 53 | 73 |
| Handling (owners) | 45 | 62 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
53
/ 100
ProContact
59
/ 100
Advan Sport AS
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ProContact
Pros
- Predictable and safe handling on dry pavement
- Competent performance in high-heat conditions
- Generally comfortable ride quality for calm, daily driving
Cons
- Significant increase in road noise as the tire ages
- Premature tread wear and limited mileage lifespan
- Structural reliability issues, including sidewall bubbles and flat-spotting
Tire B Advan Sport AS
Pros
- Quiet and comfortable highway ride
- Good overall traction in wet and dry conditions
- Excellent value for the money compared to premium competitors
Cons
- Potential road force balancing issues reported by some users
- Some enthusiasts feel ultimate performance capability is lacking
- Tread life remains largely unproven in early-mileage reviews
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ProContact | B · Yokohama Advan Sport AS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All-Season tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | — | 11/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 440 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 50,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 50 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
53
/ 100
Continental ProContact
59
/ 100
Yokohama Advan Sport AS
Winner: Yokohama Advan Sport AS — better treadwear, handling and comfort. Pick the Continental ProContact if dry matters most to you. Continental ProContact rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 12 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Yokohama Advan Sport AS scores 73 vs 53 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Yokohama Advan Sport AS scores 62 vs 45 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Yokohama Advan Sport AS scores 63 vs 48 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You drive through snowy winters
Yokohama Advan Sport AS scores 57 vs 52 on snow.
Tire A · Continental ProContact
Tire B · Yokohama Advan Sport AS
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ProContact or Advan Sport AS?
Which is better in the wet, ProContact or Advan Sport AS?
Yokohama Advan Sport AS, 60 vs 57 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, ProContact or Advan Sport AS?
Continental ProContact, 52 vs 49 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, ProContact or Advan Sport AS?
Yokohama Advan Sport AS, 57 vs 52 on our snow score.
Which is more comfortable, ProContact or Advan Sport AS?
Yokohama Advan Sport AS, 63 vs 48 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, ProContact or Advan Sport AS?
Yokohama Advan Sport AS, 73 vs 53 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology