Tests – · none yet Owners 43 · 12 reviews
Continental ProContact vs Yokohama Advan S.T — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
ProContact leads, 51–47 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
49
Dry
Advan S.T +251Why this score
Source ProContact Advan S.T Reviews found online 39 41 -
56
Wet
ProContact +650Why this score
Source ProContact Advan S.T Reviews found online 51 43 -
51
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source ProContact Advan S.T Reviews found online 38 – -
53
Comfort
ProContact +548Why this score
Source ProContact Advan S.T Reviews found online 37 28 -
54
Treadwear
ProContact +945Why this score
Source ProContact Advan S.T Reviews found online 45 31 -
41
Handling
ProContact +338Why this score
Source ProContact Advan S.T Reviews found online 41 38
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ProContact | Yokohama Advan S.T |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 51 | 47 |
| Dry | 49 | 51 |
| Wet | 56 | 50 |
| Snow | 51 | – |
| Comfort | 53 | 48 |
| Treadwear | 54 | 45 |
| Handling | 41 | 38 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
ProContact
Advan S.T
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ProContact
Pros
- Predictable and safe handling on dry pavement
- Competent performance in high-heat conditions
- Generally comfortable ride quality for calm, daily driving
Cons
- Significant increase in road noise as the tire ages
- Premature tread wear and limited mileage lifespan
- Structural reliability issues, including sidewall bubbles and flat-spotting
Tire B Advan S.T
Cons
- Poor structural integrity leading to premature bulges and distortions
- Short tread life and rapid wear
- High price point relative to performance
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ProContact | B · Yokohama Advan S.T |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | — |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental ProContact
Yokohama Advan S.T
Winner: Continental ProContact — better treadwear, wet and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Continental ProContact scores 54 vs 45 on treadwear.
Continental ProContact scores 56 vs 50 on wet.
Continental ProContact scores 53 vs 48 on comfort.
Continental ProContact scores 41 vs 38 on handling.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.