tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Continental PureContact LS vs BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

PureContact LS leads, 71–70 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · PureContact LS or g-Force Profiler on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 71

    Dry

    PureContact LS +2
    69
    Why this score
    SourcePureContact LSg-Force Profiler
    Reviews found online7370
  2. 73

    Wet

    PureContact LS +2
    71
    Why this score
    SourcePureContact LSg-Force Profiler
    Reviews found online7472
  3. 67

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourcePureContact LSg-Force Profiler
    Reviews found online64–
  4. 65

    Comfort

    g-Force Profiler +2
    67
    Why this score
    SourcePureContact LSg-Force Profiler
    Reviews found online6166
  5. 69

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourcePureContact LSg-Force Profiler
    Reviews found online73–
  6. 68

    Treadwear

    g-Force Profiler +3
    71
    Why this score
    SourcePureContact LSg-Force Profiler
    Reviews found online6975
  7. 73

    Handling

    PureContact LS +5
    68
    Why this score
    SourcePureContact LSg-Force Profiler
    Reviews found online7368
Scores at a glance
CategoryContinental PureContact LSBFGoodrich g-Force Profiler
Relative Score 71 70
Dry 71 69
Wet 73 71
Snow 67 –
Comfort 65 67
Noise 69 –
Treadwear 68 71
Handling 73 68

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost

Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.

Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost

Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

PureContact LS

g-Force Profiler

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A PureContact LS

Pros

  • Exceptionally quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Strong wet and dry traction with reliable handling
  • Good balance of everyday comfort and long treadlife

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls can lead to less responsive or wandering handling during aggressive cornering
  • Develops temporary flat spotting when parked, causing morning vibrations
  • Poor winter performance, particularly lacking traction on snow and ice despite being an all-season tire
All owner themes in the PureContact LS review

Tire B g-Force Profiler

Pros

  • Excellent dry and wet grip across a range of temperatures
  • Impressive tread life and long-lasting durability
  • High value for money at an affordable price point

Cons

  • Poor traction and handling in heavy snow and winter weather
  • Can be noisy on wet tarmac
  • Firm or crashy ride quality over rough road surfaces
All owner themes in the g-Force Profiler review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental PureContact LS B · BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler
CategoryAll SeasonHigh Performance Summer tire
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Tread depth10/32″—
UTQG700 A A—
Treadwear warranty70,000 mi—
SidewallBlack Side Wall—
Max pressure51 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental PureContact LS

BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler

Too close to call: Continental PureContact LS and BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler are within 2 points overall. Continental PureContact LS is stronger on handling. BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler is stronger on treadwear.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Continental PureContact LS scores 73 vs 68 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler scores 71 vs 68 on treadwear.

Tire A · Continental PureContact LS
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.

71

Narrow edge

PureContact LS

Amazon