Tests – · none yet Owners 68 · 25 reviews
Continental PureContact LS vs Cooper Zeon LTZ — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 25 + 11 owner reviews. How we score
PureContact LS is ahead, 69–62
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
69
Dry
PureContact LS +762Why this score
Source PureContact LS Zeon LTZ Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 69 58 PureContact LS: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 69 = 69
Zeon LTZ: 60% × 63.9 (est.) + 40% × 58 = 62
No road tests of dry for PureContact LS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Zeon LTZ. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
72
Wet
PureContact LS +666Why this score
Source PureContact LS Zeon LTZ Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 72 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 72 64 PureContact LS: 60% × 71.5 (est.) + 40% × 72.2 = 72
Zeon LTZ: 60% × 67.1 (est.) + 40% × 64.1 = 66
No road tests of wet for PureContact LS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Zeon LTZ. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
67
Snow
PureContact LS +2047Why this score
Source PureContact LS Zeon LTZ Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 58 (est.) Reviews found online 64 30 PureContact LS: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 63.9 = 67
Zeon LTZ: 60% × 57.6 (est.) + 40% × 29.9 = 47
No road tests of snow for PureContact LS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for Zeon LTZ. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
59
Comfort
Zeon LTZ +160Why this score
Source PureContact LS Zeon LTZ Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 54 56 PureContact LS: 40% × 65.7 (est.) + 60% × 54 = 59
Zeon LTZ: 40% × 66.2 (est.) + 60% × 56.4 = 60
No road tests of comfort for PureContact LS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Zeon LTZ. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
68
Noise
PureContact LS +464Why this score
Source PureContact LS Zeon LTZ Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 71 60 PureContact LS: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 70.5 = 68
Zeon LTZ: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 59.6 = 64
No road tests of noise for PureContact LS or Zeon LTZ. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
68
Treadwear
PureContact LS +266Why this score
Source PureContact LS Zeon LTZ Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 69 65 PureContact LS: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 68.8 = 68
Zeon LTZ: 60% × 66 (est.) + 40% × 65.1 = 66
No road tests of treadwear for PureContact LS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Zeon LTZ. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
70
Handling (owners)
PureContact LS +664Why this score
Source PureContact LS Zeon LTZ Reviews found online 70 64
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental PureContact LS | Cooper Zeon LTZ |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 69 | 62 |
| Dry | 69 | 62 |
| Wet | 72 | 66 |
| Snow | 67 | 47 |
| Comfort | 59 | 60 |
| Noise | 68 | 64 |
| Treadwear | 68 | 66 |
| Handling (owners) | 70 | 64 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
PureContact LS
Zeon LTZ
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A PureContact LS
Pros
- Exceptionally quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Strong wet and dry traction with reliable handling
- Good balance of everyday comfort and long treadlife
Cons
- Soft sidewalls can lead to less responsive or wandering handling during aggressive cornering
- Develops temporary flat spotting when parked, causing morning vibrations
- Poor winter performance, particularly lacking traction on snow and ice despite being an all-season tire
Tire B Zeon LTZ
Pros
- Comfortable and smooth highway ride quality
- Aggressive, attractive aesthetic that suits sport utility vehicles
- Good longevity and treadwear, with multiple users reporting up to 50,000 miles of use
Cons
- Poor traction in snow, ice, and deep sand
- Limited availability and sourcing difficulties
- Occasional reports of premature failure or punctures from dissatisfied users
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental PureContact LS | B · Cooper Zeon LTZ |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All Season All Terrain and Off Road tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | 14/32″ |
| UTQG | 700 A A | 520 A B |
| Treadwear warranty | 70,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | 50 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental PureContact LS
Cooper Zeon LTZ
Winner: Continental PureContact LS — better snow, dry and wet. Where the Cooper Zeon LTZ is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Cooper Zeon LTZ rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Continental PureContact LS scores 67 vs 47 on snow.
Continental PureContact LS scores 69 vs 62 on dry.
Continental PureContact LS scores 72 vs 66 on wet.
Continental PureContact LS scores 70 vs 64 on handling.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
PureContact LS or Zeon LTZ?
Which is better in the wet, PureContact LS or Zeon LTZ?
Continental PureContact LS, 72 vs 66 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, PureContact LS or Zeon LTZ?
Continental PureContact LS, 69 vs 62 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, PureContact LS or Zeon LTZ?
Continental PureContact LS, 67 vs 47 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, PureContact LS or Zeon LTZ?
Continental PureContact LS, 68 vs 64 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, PureContact LS or Zeon LTZ?
Neither, by our numbers: 59 vs 60 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, PureContact LS or Zeon LTZ?
Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 66 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology