Tests – · none yet Owners 68 · 25 reviews
Cooper Zeon RS3-A looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Continental PureContact LS vs Cooper Zeon RS3-A — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 25 + 26 owner reviews. How we score
PureContact LS is ahead, 69–63
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 61 · 26 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
69
Dry
PureContact LS +564Why this score
Source PureContact LS Zeon RS3-A Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 69 62 PureContact LS: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 69 = 69
Zeon RS3-A: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 62.2 = 64
No road tests of dry for PureContact LS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Zeon RS3-A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
72
Wet
PureContact LS +765Why this score
Source PureContact LS Zeon RS3-A Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 72 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 72 63 PureContact LS: 60% × 71.5 (est.) + 40% × 72.2 = 72
Zeon RS3-A: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 62.9 = 65
No road tests of wet for PureContact LS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Zeon RS3-A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
67
Snow
PureContact LS +1057Why this score
Source PureContact LS Zeon RS3-A Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 64 47 PureContact LS: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 63.9 = 67
Zeon RS3-A: 60% × 63.1 (est.) + 40% × 47.1 = 57
No road tests of snow for PureContact LS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for Zeon RS3-A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
59
Comfort
Zeon RS3-A +160Why this score
Source PureContact LS Zeon RS3-A Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 54 57 PureContact LS: 40% × 65.7 (est.) + 60% × 54 = 59
Zeon RS3-A: 40% × 66.2 (est.) + 60% × 56.6 = 60
No road tests of comfort for PureContact LS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Zeon RS3-A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
68
Noise
PureContact LS +464Why this score
Source PureContact LS Zeon RS3-A Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 71 60 PureContact LS: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 70.5 = 68
Zeon RS3-A: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 60 = 64
No road tests of noise for PureContact LS or Zeon RS3-A. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
68
Treadwear
PureContact LS +266Why this score
Source PureContact LS Zeon RS3-A Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 69 66 PureContact LS: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 68.8 = 68
Zeon RS3-A: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 66.2 = 66
No road tests of treadwear for PureContact LS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Zeon RS3-A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
70
Handling (owners)
PureContact LS +367Why this score
Source PureContact LS Zeon RS3-A Reviews found online 70 67
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental PureContact LS | Cooper Zeon RS3-A |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 69 | 63 |
| Dry | 69 | 64 |
| Wet | 72 | 65 |
| Snow | 67 | 57 |
| Comfort | 59 | 60 |
| Noise | 68 | 64 |
| Treadwear | 68 | 66 |
| Handling (owners) | 70 | 67 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
PureContact LS
Zeon RS3-A
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A PureContact LS
Pros
- Exceptionally quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Strong wet and dry traction with reliable handling
- Good balance of everyday comfort and long treadlife
Cons
- Soft sidewalls can lead to less responsive or wandering handling during aggressive cornering
- Develops temporary flat spotting when parked, causing morning vibrations
- Poor winter performance, particularly lacking traction on snow and ice despite being an all-season tire
Tire B Zeon RS3-A
Pros
- Exceptional dry and wet traction
- High value and affordable price point
- Comfortable and responsive ride quality
Cons
- Shorter tread life due to soft rubber compounds
- Can become noisy as the tread wears down
- Mixed performance reported in deep snow or severe winter conditions
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental PureContact LS | B · Cooper Zeon RS3-A |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | Ultra High Performance All Season tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | 10.5/32″ |
| UTQG | 700 A A | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 70,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental PureContact LS
Cooper Zeon RS3-A
Winner: Continental PureContact LS — better snow, wet and dry. Where the Cooper Zeon RS3-A is ahead, it is by less than 3 points.
Continental PureContact LS scores 67 vs 57 on snow.
Continental PureContact LS scores 72 vs 65 on wet.
Continental PureContact LS scores 69 vs 64 on dry.
Continental PureContact LS scores 68 vs 64 on noise.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
PureContact LS or Zeon RS3-A?
Which is better in the wet, PureContact LS or Zeon RS3-A?
Continental PureContact LS, 72 vs 65 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, PureContact LS or Zeon RS3-A?
Continental PureContact LS, 69 vs 64 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, PureContact LS or Zeon RS3-A?
Continental PureContact LS, 67 vs 57 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, PureContact LS or Zeon RS3-A?
Continental PureContact LS, 68 vs 64 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, PureContact LS or Zeon RS3-A?
Neither, by our numbers: 59 vs 60 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, PureContact LS or Zeon RS3-A?
Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 66 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology