Tests – · none yet Owners 68 · 25 reviews
Continental PureContact LS vs Kumho Ecsta V730 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 25 + 187 owner reviews. How we score
PureContact LS is ahead, 69–56
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 72 · 1 test Owners 50 · 187 reviews
Best test result: #4 of 11 in 2022 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test (dry handling)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
69
Dry
Ecsta V730 +473Why this score
Source PureContact LS Ecsta V730 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 68 (est.) 72 Reviews found online 69 76 PureContact LS: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 69 = 69
Ecsta V730: 60% × 71.6 + 40% × 76.3 = 73
No road tests of dry for PureContact LS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
72
Wet
PureContact LS +3735Why this score
Source PureContact LS Ecsta V730 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 72 (est.) ≈ 44 (est.) Reviews found online 72 21 PureContact LS: 60% × 71.5 (est.) + 40% × 72.2 = 72
Ecsta V730: 60% × 43.8 (est.) + 40% × 21.4 = 35
No road tests of wet for PureContact LS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Ecsta V730. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
67
Snow
PureContact LS +1750Why this score
Source PureContact LS Ecsta V730 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 59 (est.) Reviews found online 64 35 PureContact LS: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 63.9 = 67
Ecsta V730: 60% × 59.3 (est.) + 40% × 35.1 = 50
No road tests of snow for PureContact LS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for Ecsta V730. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
59
Comfort
PureContact LS +653Why this score
Source PureContact LS Ecsta V730 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 54 45 PureContact LS: 40% × 65.7 (est.) + 60% × 54 = 59
Ecsta V730: 40% × 64 (est.) + 60% × 45.3 = 53
No road tests of comfort for PureContact LS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Ecsta V730. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
68
Noise
PureContact LS +464Why this score
Source PureContact LS Ecsta V730 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 71 61 PureContact LS: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 70.5 = 68
Ecsta V730: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 61.1 = 64
No road tests of noise for PureContact LS or Ecsta V730. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
68
Treadwear
PureContact LS +959Why this score
Source PureContact LS Ecsta V730 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 62 (est.) Reviews found online 69 55 PureContact LS: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 68.8 = 68
Ecsta V730: 60% × 62.2 (est.) + 40% × 54.6 = 59
No road tests of treadwear for PureContact LS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Ecsta V730. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
70
Handling (owners)
PureContact LS +169Why this score
Source PureContact LS Ecsta V730 Reviews found online 70 69
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental PureContact LS | Kumho Ecsta V730 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 69 | 56 |
| Dry | 69 | 73 |
| Wet | 72 | 35 |
| Snow | 67 | 50 |
| Comfort | 59 | 53 |
| Noise | 68 | 64 |
| Treadwear | 68 | 59 |
| Handling (owners) | 70 | 69 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
PureContact LS
Ecsta V730
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A PureContact LS
Pros
- Exceptionally quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Strong wet and dry traction with reliable handling
- Good balance of everyday comfort and long treadlife
Cons
- Soft sidewalls can lead to less responsive or wandering handling during aggressive cornering
- Develops temporary flat spotting when parked, causing morning vibrations
- Poor winter performance, particularly lacking traction on snow and ice despite being an all-season tire
Tire B Ecsta V730
Pros
- Excellent dry grip and predictable handling characteristics at the limit.
- High heat tolerance with minimal 'greasy' drop-off during long track sessions.
- Superior tread life and durability compared to many direct 200TW competitors.
Cons
- Poor wet weather performance, particularly with standing water or worn tread.
- Requires significant heat to reach optimal operating temperature, making them poor for cold-weather street use.
- Harsh ride quality and high road noise due to the stiff sidewall construction.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental PureContact LS | B · Kumho Ecsta V730 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 6 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 19″ |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | 8.5/32″ |
| UTQG | 700 A A | 200 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | 70,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental PureContact LS
Kumho Ecsta V730
Winner: Continental PureContact LS — better wet, snow and treadwear. Pick the Kumho Ecsta V730 if dry matters most to you.
Continental PureContact LS scores 72 vs 35 on wet.
Continental PureContact LS scores 67 vs 50 on snow.
Continental PureContact LS scores 68 vs 59 on treadwear.
Continental PureContact LS scores 59 vs 53 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
PureContact LS or Ecsta V730?
Which is better in the wet, PureContact LS or Ecsta V730?
Continental PureContact LS, 72 vs 35 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, PureContact LS or Ecsta V730?
Kumho Ecsta V730, 73 vs 69 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, PureContact LS or Ecsta V730?
Continental PureContact LS, 67 vs 50 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, PureContact LS or Ecsta V730?
Continental PureContact LS, 68 vs 64 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, PureContact LS or Ecsta V730?
Continental PureContact LS, 59 vs 53 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, PureContact LS or Ecsta V730?
Continental PureContact LS, 68 vs 59 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology