Tests – · none yet Owners 71 · 25 reviews
Continental PureContact LS vs Michelin Energy MXV4+ — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
PureContact LS is ahead, 71–55
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 52 · 4 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
71
Dry
PureContact LS +2249Why this score
Source PureContact LS Energy MXV4+ Reviews found online 73 39 -
73
Wet
PureContact LS +1855Why this score
Source PureContact LS Energy MXV4+ Reviews found online 74 49 -
67
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source PureContact LS Energy MXV4+ Reviews found online 64 – -
65
Comfort
Energy MXV4+ +368Why this score
Source PureContact LS Energy MXV4+ Reviews found online 61 66 -
69
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source PureContact LS Energy MXV4+ Reviews found online 73 – -
68
Treadwear
PureContact LS +266Why this score
Source PureContact LS Energy MXV4+ Reviews found online 69 67 -
73
Handling
PureContact LS +3043Why this score
Source PureContact LS Energy MXV4+ Reviews found online 73 43
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental PureContact LS | Michelin Energy MXV4+ |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 71 | 55 |
| Dry | 71 | 49 |
| Wet | 73 | 55 |
| Snow | 67 | – |
| Comfort | 65 | 68 |
| Noise | 69 | – |
| Treadwear | 68 | 66 |
| Handling | 73 | 43 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
PureContact LS
Energy MXV4+
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A PureContact LS
Pros
- Exceptionally quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Strong wet and dry traction with reliable handling
- Good balance of everyday comfort and long treadlife
Cons
- Soft sidewalls can lead to less responsive or wandering handling during aggressive cornering
- Develops temporary flat spotting when parked, causing morning vibrations
- Poor winter performance, particularly lacking traction on snow and ice despite being an all-season tire
Tire B Energy MXV4+
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and cabin quietness
- High tread longevity and durability
- Strong value proposition as an OEM-style replacement
Cons
- Poor steering response and handling precision
- Degraded wet weather performance as the tread wears
- Instability and vibration issues at higher highway speeds
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental PureContact LS | B · Michelin Energy MXV4+ |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All Season Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 700 A A | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 70,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | — |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental PureContact LS
Michelin Energy MXV4+
Winner: Continental PureContact LS — better handling, dry and wet. Pick the Michelin Energy MXV4+ if comfort matters most to you.
Continental PureContact LS scores 73 vs 43 on handling.
Continental PureContact LS scores 71 vs 49 on dry.
Continental PureContact LS scores 73 vs 55 on wet.
Michelin Energy MXV4+ scores 68 vs 65 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.