Tests – · none yet Owners 68 · 25 reviews
Pirelli Scorpion ICE plus SNOW looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Continental PureContact LS vs Pirelli Scorpion ICE plus SNOW — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 25 + 14 owner reviews. How we score
Scorpion ICE plus SNOW leads, 73–69 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 75 · 14 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
69
Dry
Scorpion ICE plus SNOW +271Why this score
Source PureContact LS Scorpion ICE plus SNOW Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 70 72 PureContact LS: 60% × 68.7 (est.) + 40% × 69.5 = 69
Scorpion ICE plus SNOW: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 72.1 = 71
No road tests of dry for PureContact LS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for Scorpion ICE plus SNOW. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
72
Wet
Scorpion ICE plus SNOW +476Why this score
Source PureContact LS Scorpion ICE plus SNOW Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 72 (est.) ≈ 75 (est.) Reviews found online 73 78 PureContact LS: 60% × 71.7 (est.) + 40% × 72.5 = 72
Scorpion ICE plus SNOW: 60% × 74.6 (est.) + 40% × 77.7 = 76
No road tests of wet for PureContact LS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Scorpion ICE plus SNOW. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
67
Snow
Scorpion ICE plus SNOW +774Why this score
Source PureContact LS Scorpion ICE plus SNOW Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 73 (est.) Reviews found online 64 76 PureContact LS: 60% × 68.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.2 = 67
Scorpion ICE plus SNOW: 60% × 72.8 (est.) + 40% × 76.2 = 74
No road tests of snow for PureContact LS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
No road tests of snow for Scorpion ICE plus SNOW. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
59
Comfort
Scorpion ICE plus SNOW +1170Why this score
Source PureContact LS Scorpion ICE plus SNOW Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 55 71 PureContact LS: 40% × 66.5 (est.) + 60% × 54.7 = 59
Scorpion ICE plus SNOW: 40% × 69.5 (est.) + 60% × 71 = 70
No road tests of comfort for PureContact LS or Scorpion ICE plus SNOW. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
68
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source PureContact LS Scorpion ICE plus SNOW Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) – Reviews found online 71 – PureContact LS: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 70.8 = 68
No road tests of noise for PureContact LS. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
68
Treadwear
Scorpion ICE plus SNOW +472Why this score
Source PureContact LS Scorpion ICE plus SNOW Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 69 76 PureContact LS: 60% × 67 (est.) + 40% × 68.7 = 68
Scorpion ICE plus SNOW: 60% × 69.7 (est.) + 40% × 76.4 = 72
No road tests of treadwear for PureContact LS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for Scorpion ICE plus SNOW. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
70
Handling (owners)
PureContact LS +169Why this score
Source PureContact LS Scorpion ICE plus SNOW Reviews found online 70 69
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental PureContact LS | Pirelli Scorpion ICE plus SNOW |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 69 | 73 |
| Dry | 69 | 71 |
| Wet | 72 | 76 |
| Snow | 67 | 74 |
| Comfort | 59 | 70 |
| Noise | 68 | – |
| Treadwear | 68 | 72 |
| Handling (owners) | 70 | 69 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
PureContact LS
Scorpion ICE plus SNOW
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A PureContact LS
Pros
- Exceptionally quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Strong wet and dry traction with reliable handling
- Good balance of everyday comfort and long treadlife
Cons
- Soft sidewalls can lead to less responsive or wandering handling during aggressive cornering
- Develops temporary flat spotting when parked, causing morning vibrations
- Poor winter performance, particularly lacking traction on snow and ice despite being an all-season tire
Tire B Scorpion ICE plus SNOW
Pros
- Exceptional grip and confidence on severe ice and snow-covered roads
- Outstanding longevity and high mileage capabilities over multiple winter seasons
- Reliable performance for heavy vehicles and towing applications
Cons
- Noticeable road noise on dry pavement
- Rapid tread wear reported by some users under certain driving conditions
- Subpar performance and grip in deep mud off-road
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental PureContact LS | B · Pirelli Scorpion ICE plus SNOW |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | Winter |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 700 A A | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 70,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | — |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental PureContact LS
Pirelli Scorpion ICE plus SNOW
Narrow edge: Pirelli Scorpion ICE plus SNOW — better comfort, snow and wet. Where the Continental PureContact LS is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Pirelli Scorpion ICE plus SNOW rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 14 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pirelli Scorpion ICE plus SNOW scores 70 vs 59 on comfort.
Pirelli Scorpion ICE plus SNOW scores 74 vs 67 on snow.
Pirelli Scorpion ICE plus SNOW scores 76 vs 72 on wet.
Pirelli Scorpion ICE plus SNOW scores 72 vs 68 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
PureContact LS or Scorpion ICE plus SNOW?
Which is better in the wet, PureContact LS or Scorpion ICE plus SNOW?
Pirelli Scorpion ICE plus SNOW, 76 vs 72 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, PureContact LS or Scorpion ICE plus SNOW?
Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 71 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is better in snow, PureContact LS or Scorpion ICE plus SNOW?
Pirelli Scorpion ICE plus SNOW, 74 vs 67 on our snow score.
Which is more comfortable, PureContact LS or Scorpion ICE plus SNOW?
Pirelli Scorpion ICE plus SNOW, 70 vs 59 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, PureContact LS or Scorpion ICE plus SNOW?
Pirelli Scorpion ICE plus SNOW, 72 vs 68 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology