tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Continental PureContact LS vs Yokohama Advan Sport AS — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 2 road tests and 25 + 15 owner reviews. How we score

PureContact LS is ahead, 69–60

Check price on Amazon · PureContact LS or Advan Sport AS on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Yokohama Advan Sport AS
Tire BYokohama

Advan Sport AS

All-Season tire

± 8

Tests 61 · 2 tests Owners 60 · 15 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 19 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires (tested tread life (miles))

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 69

    Dry

    PureContact LS +20
    49
    Why this score
    SourcePureContact LSAdvan Sport AS
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 68 (est.)42
    Reviews found online6960

    PureContact LS: 60% × 68.3 (est.) + 40% × 68.9 = 69

    Advan Sport AS: 60% × 41.9 + 40% × 59.9 = 49

    No road tests of dry for PureContact LS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 72

    Wet

    PureContact LS +12
    60
    Why this score
    SourcePureContact LSAdvan Sport AS
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 72 (est.)58
    Reviews found online7264

    PureContact LS: 60% × 71.5 (est.) + 40% × 72.2 = 72

    Advan Sport AS: 60% × 57.6 + 40% × 64.2 = 60

    No road tests of wet for PureContact LS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 67

    Snow

    PureContact LS +10
    57
    Why this score
    SourcePureContact LSAdvan Sport AS
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online6447

    PureContact LS: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 64 = 67

    Advan Sport AS: 60% × 63.1 (est.) + 40% × 47.4 = 57

    No road tests of snow for PureContact LS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for Advan Sport AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 59

    Comfort

    Advan Sport AS +4
    63
    Why this score
    SourcePureContact LSAdvan Sport AS
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 66 (est.)62
    Reviews found online5464

    PureContact LS: 40% × 65.7 (est.) + 60% × 53.8 = 59

    Advan Sport AS: 40% × 61.7 + 60% × 63.8 = 63

    No road tests of comfort for PureContact LS. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 68

    Noise

    Advan Sport AS +1
    69
    Why this score
    SourcePureContact LSAdvan Sport AS
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 66 (est.)72
    Reviews found online7063

    PureContact LS: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 70.3 = 68

    Advan Sport AS: 60% × 72.4 + 40% × 63.1 = 69

    No road tests of noise for PureContact LS. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 68

    Treadwear

    Advan Sport AS +5
    73
    Why this score
    SourcePureContact LSAdvan Sport AS
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 67 (est.)81
    Reviews found online6960

    PureContact LS: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 68.8 = 68

    Advan Sport AS: 60% × 80.9 + 40% × 60 = 73

    No road tests of treadwear for PureContact LS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 69

    Handling (owners)

    PureContact LS +7
    62
    Why this score
    SourcePureContact LSAdvan Sport AS
    Reviews found online6962
Scores at a glance
CategoryContinental PureContact LSYokohama Advan Sport AS
Relative Score 69 60
Dry 69 49
Wet 72 60
Snow 67 57
Comfort 59 63
Noise 68 69
Treadwear 68 73
Handling (owners) 69 62

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

PureContact LS

± 8

Advan Sport AS

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A PureContact LS

Pros

  • Exceptionally quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Strong wet and dry traction with reliable handling
  • Good balance of everyday comfort and long treadlife

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls can lead to less responsive or wandering handling during aggressive cornering
  • Develops temporary flat spotting when parked, causing morning vibrations
  • Poor winter performance, particularly lacking traction on snow and ice despite being an all-season tire
All owner themes in the PureContact LS review

Tire B Advan Sport AS

Pros

  • Quiet and comfortable highway ride
  • Good overall traction in wet and dry conditions
  • Excellent value for the money compared to premium competitors

Cons

  • Potential road force balancing issues reported by some users
  • Some enthusiasts feel ultimate performance capability is lacking
  • Tread life remains largely unproven in early-mileage reviews
All owner themes in the Advan Sport AS review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental PureContact LS B · Yokohama Advan Sport AS
CategoryAll SeasonAll-Season tire
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Tread depth10/32″11/32″
UTQG700 A A440 A A
Treadwear warranty70,000 mi50,000 mi
SidewallBlack Side WallBlackwall
Max pressure51 psi50 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental PureContact LS

Yokohama Advan Sport AS

Winner: Continental PureContact LS — better dry, wet and snow. Pick the Yokohama Advan Sport AS if treadwear and comfort matter most to you.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Continental PureContact LS scores 69 vs 49 on dry.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental PureContact LS scores 72 vs 60 on wet.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Continental PureContact LS scores 67 vs 57 on snow.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Continental PureContact LS scores 69 vs 62 on handling.

Tire A · Continental PureContact LS
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama Advan Sport AS
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

PureContact LS or Advan Sport AS?

Which is better in the wet, PureContact LS or Advan Sport AS?

Continental PureContact LS, 72 vs 60 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, PureContact LS or Advan Sport AS?

Continental PureContact LS, 69 vs 49 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, PureContact LS or Advan Sport AS?

Continental PureContact LS, 67 vs 57 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, PureContact LS or Advan Sport AS?

Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 69 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, PureContact LS or Advan Sport AS?

Yokohama Advan Sport AS, 63 vs 59 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, PureContact LS or Advan Sport AS?

Yokohama Advan Sport AS, 73 vs 68 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology