Head-to-head Updated

Continental PureContact LS vs Yokohama Geolandar G91A — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 25 + 5 owner reviews. How we score

PureContact LS is ahead, 70–38

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 71

    Dry

    PureContact LS +34
    37
    Why this score
    SourcePureContact LSGeolandar G91A
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 49 (est.)
    Reviews found online7321

    PureContact LS: 60% × 69.6 (est.) + 40% × 72.5 = 71

    Geolandar G91A: 60% × 48.7 (est.) + 40% × 20.5 = 37

    No road tests of dry for PureContact LS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Geolandar G91A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 73

    Wet

    PureContact LS +41
    32
    Why this score
    SourcePureContact LSGeolandar G91A
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 72 (est.)≈ 41 (est.)
    Reviews found online7419

    PureContact LS: 60% × 72.3 (est.) + 40% × 74.2 = 73

    Geolandar G91A: 60% × 41.3 (est.) + 40% × 18.9 = 32

    No road tests of wet for PureContact LS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Geolandar G91A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 67

    Snow

    PureContact LS +19
    48
    Why this score
    SourcePureContact LSGeolandar G91A
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 58 (est.)
    Reviews found online6433

    PureContact LS: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 64.4 = 67

    Geolandar G91A: 60% × 57.5 (est.) + 40% × 32.5 = 48

    No road tests of snow for PureContact LS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

    No road tests of snow for Geolandar G91A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 65

    Comfort

    PureContact LS +24
    41
    Why this score
    SourcePureContact LSGeolandar G91A
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online6114

    PureContact LS: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 61.4 = 65

    Geolandar G91A: 60% × 59.6 (est.) + 40% × 14.1 = 41

    No road tests of comfort for PureContact LS or Geolandar G91A. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 70

    Noise

    PureContact LS +18
    52
    Why this score
    SourcePureContact LSGeolandar G91A
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7329

    PureContact LS: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 73.3 = 70

    Geolandar G91A: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 29 = 52

    No road tests of noise for PureContact LS or Geolandar G91A. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 68

    Treadwear

    PureContact LS +29
    39
    Why this score
    SourcePureContact LSGeolandar G91A
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 52 (est.)
    Reviews found online6920

    PureContact LS: 60% × 66.7 (est.) + 40% × 69.1 = 68

    Geolandar G91A: 60% × 51.6 (est.) + 40% × 20.1 = 39

    No road tests of treadwear for PureContact LS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Geolandar G91A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 73

    Handling (owners)

    PureContact LS +50
    23
    Why this score
    SourcePureContact LSGeolandar G91A
    Reviews found online7323
Scores at a glance
Continental PureContact LS vs Yokohama Geolandar G91A: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental PureContact LSYokohama Geolandar G91A
Relative Score 70 38
Dry 71 37
Wet 73 32
Snow 67 48
Comfort 65 41
Noise 70 52
Treadwear 68 39
Handling (owners) 73 23

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

PureContact LS

Geolandar G91A

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A PureContact LS

Pros

  • Exceptionally quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Strong wet and dry traction with reliable handling
  • Good balance of everyday comfort and long treadlife

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls can lead to less responsive or wandering handling during aggressive cornering
  • Develops temporary flat spotting when parked, causing morning vibrations
  • Poor winter performance, particularly lacking traction on snow and ice despite being an all-season tire
All owner themes in the PureContact LS review

Tire B Geolandar G91A

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental PureContact LS B · Yokohama Geolandar G91A
CategoryAll SeasonAll-Season tire
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Tread depth10/32″10/32″
UTQG700 A A280 B A
Treadwear warranty70,000 mi—
SidewallBlack Side WallBlackwall
Max pressure51 psi44 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental PureContact LS

Yokohama Geolandar G91A

Winner: Continental PureContact LS — better handling, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Yokohama Geolandar G91A rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Continental PureContact LS scores 73 vs 23 on handling.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental PureContact LS scores 73 vs 32 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Continental PureContact LS scores 71 vs 37 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Continental PureContact LS scores 68 vs 39 on treadwear.

Tire A · Continental PureContact LS
Tire B · Yokohama Geolandar G91A

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

PureContact LS or Geolandar G91A?

Which is better in the wet, PureContact LS or Geolandar G91A?

Continental PureContact LS, 73 vs 32 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, PureContact LS or Geolandar G91A?

Continental PureContact LS, 71 vs 37 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, PureContact LS or Geolandar G91A?

Continental PureContact LS, 67 vs 48 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, PureContact LS or Geolandar G91A?

Continental PureContact LS, 70 vs 52 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, PureContact LS or Geolandar G91A?

Continental PureContact LS, 65 vs 41 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, PureContact LS or Geolandar G91A?

Continental PureContact LS, 68 vs 39 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology