Tests – · none yet Owners 60 · 18 reviews
Continental Sport Contact looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Continental Sport Contact vs Continental PremiumContact — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 18 + 15 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: Sport Contact 63, PremiumContact 64.
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 62 · 15 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
64
Dry
PremiumContact +165Why this score
Source Sport Contact PremiumContact Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 62 64 Sport Contact: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 62.1 = 64
PremiumContact: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 63.8 = 65
No road tests of dry for Sport Contact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for PremiumContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
66
Wet
Sport Contact +264Why this score
Source Sport Contact PremiumContact Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 65 62 Sport Contact: 60% × 67.4 (est.) + 40% × 64.6 = 66
PremiumContact: 60% × 65.8 (est.) + 40% × 61.7 = 64
No road tests of wet for Sport Contact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for PremiumContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
62
Comfort
PremiumContact +163Why this score
Source Sport Contact PremiumContact Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 58 59 Sport Contact: 40% × 67.1 (est.) + 60% × 58 = 62
PremiumContact: 40% × 67.3 (est.) + 60% × 59.3 = 63
No road tests of comfort for Sport Contact or PremiumContact. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
58
Treadwear
PremiumContact +563Why this score
Source Sport Contact PremiumContact Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 61 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 53 61 Sport Contact: 60% × 61.4 (est.) + 40% × 52.6 = 58
PremiumContact: 60% × 64.4 (est.) + 40% × 61.1 = 63
No road tests of treadwear for Sport Contact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for PremiumContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
62
Handling (owners)
Sport Contact +359Why this score
Source Sport Contact PremiumContact Reviews found online 62 59
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental Sport Contact | Continental PremiumContact |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 63 | 64 |
| Dry | 64 | 65 |
| Wet | 66 | 64 |
| Comfort | 62 | 63 |
| Treadwear | 58 | 63 |
| Handling (owners) | 62 | 59 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Sport Contact
PremiumContact
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Sport Contact
Pros
- Excellent dry weather grip and cornering stability
- Commendable tread life and durability for a performance-oriented tire
- Predictable and progressive handling characteristics
Cons
- Noticeable decline in wet weather performance as tread depth decreases
- Inconsistent tread wear reports ranging from 6,000 to 40,000 miles
- Increased road noise reported by some users
Tire B PremiumContact
Pros
- Excellent dry-weather grip and handling
- Strong longevity and tread life for many users
- High level of ride comfort
Cons
- Noticeable loss of wet-weather traction as the tire ages
- Increased road noise at higher speeds or after significant mileage
- Susceptibility to aquaplaning in standing water
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental Sport Contact | B · Continental PremiumContact |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 3 |
| Rim diameters | — | 16″ – 19″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental Sport Contact
Continental PremiumContact
Too close to call: Continental Sport Contact and Continental PremiumContact are within 2 points overall. Continental PremiumContact is stronger on treadwear. Continental Sport Contact rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 18 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Continental PremiumContact rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 15 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Continental PremiumContact scores 63 vs 58 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Sport Contact or PremiumContact?
Which is better in the wet, Sport Contact or PremiumContact?
Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 64 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, Sport Contact or PremiumContact?
Neither, by our numbers: 64 vs 65 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, Sport Contact or PremiumContact?
Neither, by our numbers: 62 vs 63 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, Sport Contact or PremiumContact?
Continental PremiumContact, 63 vs 58 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology