tirewheelguide

BFGoodrich Traction T/A looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Continental TrueContact Tour vs BFGoodrich Traction T/A — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 19 + 4 owner reviews. How we score

Check price on Amazon · TrueContact Tour Check price on Amazon · Traction T/A
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

BFGoodrich Traction T/A
Tire BBFGoodrich

Traction T/A

High Performance All Season tire

Tests – · none yet Owners – · 4 reviews (needs 5)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 78

    Dry

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceTrueContact TourTraction T/A
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 74 (est.)–
    Reviews found online83–

    TrueContact Tour: 60% × 74.3 (est.) + 40% × 82.8 = 78

    No road tests of dry for TrueContact Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 83

    Wet

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceTrueContact TourTraction T/A
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 80 (est.)–
    Reviews found online88–

    TrueContact Tour: 60% × 80.1 (est.) + 40% × 87.7 = 83

    No road tests of wet for TrueContact Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 70

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceTrueContact TourTraction T/A
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)–
    Reviews found online69–

    TrueContact Tour: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 68.8 = 70

    No road tests of snow for TrueContact Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 76

    Comfort

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceTrueContact TourTraction T/A
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)–
    Reviews found online80–

    TrueContact Tour: 40% × 71.1 (est.) + 60% × 79.7 = 76

    No road tests of comfort for TrueContact Tour. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 73

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceTrueContact TourTraction T/A
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online83–

    TrueContact Tour: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 82.7 = 73

    No road tests of noise for TrueContact Tour. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 78

    Treadwear

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceTrueContact TourTraction T/A
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 73 (est.)–
    Reviews found online86–

    TrueContact Tour: 60% × 73.1 (est.) + 40% × 85.9 = 78

    No road tests of treadwear for TrueContact Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 81

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceTrueContact TourTraction T/A
    Reviews found online81–
Scores at a glance
CategoryContinental TrueContact TourBFGoodrich Traction T/A
Relative Score 78 –
Dry 78 –
Wet 83 –
Snow 70 –
Comfort 76 –
Noise 73 –
Treadwear 78 –
Handling (owners) 81 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

TrueContact Tour

Traction T/A

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A TrueContact Tour

Pros

  • Extremely low road noise and a comfortable ride quality that absorbs bumps well
  • Impressive tread life and overall mileage durability
  • Reliable wet weather grip and cornering confidence

Cons

  • Some users reported a noticeable drop in fuel economy
  • Desire for improved water displacement grooves to better handle heavy rain
  • Limited performance in deep winter or heavy snow conditions
All owner themes in the TrueContact Tour review

Tire B Traction T/A

Pros

  • Competitive pricing compared to premium alternatives
  • Strong traction and stability in winter conditions
  • Good tread wear longevity

Cons

  • Excessive and intrusive road noise
  • Poor wet-weather grip and handling
  • Audible squealing during cornering
All owner themes in the Traction T/A review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental TrueContact Tour B · BFGoodrich Traction T/A
CategoryAll Season Premium Touring tiresHigh Performance All Season tire
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Tread depth11/32″—
UTQG700 - 800 A A - B—
SidewallBlack Side Wall - White Wall—
Max pressure44 - 51 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental TrueContact Tour

BFGoodrich Traction T/A

Only Continental TrueContact Tour has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.

Tire A · Continental TrueContact Tour
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · BFGoodrich Traction T/A
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology