Tests – · none yet Owners 82 · 19 reviews
Continental TrueContact Tour vs Cooper CS5 Grand Touring — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 19 + 776 owner reviews. How we score
TrueContact Tour leads, 78–74 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 76 · 776 reviews
“I too was looking for quiet tires when it came time to replace. Have been very happy with COOPER CS5 GRAND TOURING ==> The CS5 has many modern technologies which improve longevity and traction AND they are M+S rated. I run them all year in Vermont and the snow traction is acceptable with Subaru AWD.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
77
Dry
Level77Why this score
Source TrueContact Tour CS5 Grand Touring Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 74 (est.) ≈ 74 (est.) Reviews found online 82 82 TrueContact Tour: 60% × 73.8 (est.) + 40% × 82.2 = 77
CS5 Grand Touring: 60% × 73.6 (est.) + 40% × 81.6 = 77
No road tests of dry for TrueContact Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for CS5 Grand Touring. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
83
Wet
TrueContact Tour +677Why this score
Source TrueContact Tour CS5 Grand Touring Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 80 (est.) ≈ 75 (est.) Reviews found online 87 79 TrueContact Tour: 60% × 79.8 (est.) + 40% × 87.4 = 83
CS5 Grand Touring: 60% × 75.2 (est.) + 40% × 79 = 77
No road tests of wet for TrueContact Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for CS5 Grand Touring. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
69
Snow
TrueContact Tour +366Why this score
Source TrueContact Tour CS5 Grand Touring Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 68 64 TrueContact Tour: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 68.4 = 69
CS5 Grand Touring: 60% × 68.3 (est.) + 40% × 63.6 = 66
No road tests of snow for TrueContact Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for CS5 Grand Touring. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
76
Comfort
TrueContact Tour +274Why this score
Source TrueContact Tour CS5 Grand Touring Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 79 76 TrueContact Tour: 40% × 70.7 (est.) + 60% × 79.1 = 76
CS5 Grand Touring: 40% × 70.1 (est.) + 60% × 76 = 74
No road tests of comfort for TrueContact Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for CS5 Grand Touring. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
73
Noise
TrueContact Tour +172Why this score
Source TrueContact Tour CS5 Grand Touring Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 83 81 TrueContact Tour: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 82.5 = 73
CS5 Grand Touring: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 80.8 = 72
No road tests of noise for TrueContact Tour or CS5 Grand Touring. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
79
Treadwear
TrueContact Tour +970Why this score
Source TrueContact Tour CS5 Grand Touring Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 74 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 86 73 TrueContact Tour: 60% × 73.6 (est.) + 40% × 86.2 = 79
CS5 Grand Touring: 60% × 68.8 (est.) + 40% × 72.8 = 70
No road tests of treadwear for TrueContact Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for CS5 Grand Touring. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
80
Handling (owners)
TrueContact Tour +872Why this score
Source TrueContact Tour CS5 Grand Touring Reviews found online 80 72
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental TrueContact Tour | Cooper CS5 Grand Touring |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 78 | 74 |
| Dry | 77 | 77 |
| Wet | 83 | 77 |
| Snow | 69 | 66 |
| Comfort | 76 | 74 |
| Noise | 73 | 72 |
| Treadwear | 79 | 70 |
| Handling (owners) | 80 | 72 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
TrueContact Tour
CS5 Grand Touring
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A TrueContact Tour
Pros
- Extremely low road noise and a comfortable ride quality that absorbs bumps well
- Impressive tread life and overall mileage durability
- Reliable wet weather grip and cornering confidence
Cons
- Some users reported a noticeable drop in fuel economy
- Desire for improved water displacement grooves to better handle heavy rain
- Limited performance in deep winter or heavy snow conditions
Tire B CS5 Grand Touring
Pros
- Excellent wet and dry traction with strong hydroplaning resistance
- High value for the price compared to premium competitors
- Smooth, comfortable ride quality
Cons
- Some drivers experienced noticeable road noise, particularly on specific lighter vehicles like hybrids
- Mediocre performance in heavy winter snow, ice, or deep mud
- Cornering grip in emergency maneuvers is considered average by some drivers
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Continental TrueContact Tour
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Cooper CS5 Grand Touring
Community sentiment toward the Cooper CS5 Grand Touring is largely positive, with owners highlighting its smooth ride, low road noise, and reliable all-season traction in rain and light snow. While praised as a strong value compared to premium competitors like Michelin, several users note that treadwear often falls short of the advertised 80,000-mile warranty, particularly on heavier minivans or under high-heat conditions.
“I put Cooper CS5 Grand Tourings on my Sienna after having gone through several sets of Michelins, I am happy with them so far. Regardless of what tire you purchase, they will not get to their warranty mileage on a Sienna. The Sienna is notoriously hard on tires. A word of advice, run them at 40 to 42 PSI and rotate them regularly if you want to get reasonable wear. The Sienna's 35 PSI recommendation is FAR too low for the weight the tires carry and the front tires wear 3x faster than the rears.”
“I have the Cooper cs5 grand touring on my Odyssey and love them. Very quiet and snoot riding. Fwiw, I'm in Southern California so we have little cold/wet weather let alone snow, but they did great when I drove up to Sequoia and had cables on during the snow storm. Much better than the Michelin Defenders I had before.”
“My wife and I have been running Cooper CS5 Grand Touring on Outback and Impreza for many years. (the Outback is on its 2nd set) For us, having a QUIET tire is primary importance... followed closely with winter-traction here in Vermont winters. We do NOT want to have 2nd set of dedicated snow-tires for the winter. The CS5 have met our requirements. At the very least, I would suggest you consider the CS5 Ultra as you make a decision.”
Based on 38 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental TrueContact Tour | B · Cooper CS5 Grand Touring |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season Premium Touring tires | All Season Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Tread depth | 11/32″ | 11 - 12/32″ |
| UTQG | 700 - 800 A A - B | 780 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 80,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - White Wall | Black Side Wall |
| Max pressure | 44 - 51 psi | 44 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental TrueContact Tour
Cooper CS5 Grand Touring
Narrow edge: Continental TrueContact Tour — better treadwear, handling and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Continental TrueContact Tour rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 19 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Continental TrueContact Tour scores 79 vs 70 on treadwear.
Continental TrueContact Tour scores 80 vs 72 on handling.
Continental TrueContact Tour scores 83 vs 77 on wet.
Continental TrueContact Tour scores 69 vs 66 on snow.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
TrueContact Tour or CS5 Grand Touring?
Which is better in the wet, TrueContact Tour or CS5 Grand Touring?
Continental TrueContact Tour, 83 vs 77 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, TrueContact Tour or CS5 Grand Touring?
Neither, by our numbers: 77 vs 77 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is better in snow, TrueContact Tour or CS5 Grand Touring?
Continental TrueContact Tour, 69 vs 66 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, TrueContact Tour or CS5 Grand Touring?
Neither, by our numbers: 73 vs 72 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, TrueContact Tour or CS5 Grand Touring?
Neither, by our numbers: 76 vs 74 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, TrueContact Tour or CS5 Grand Touring?
Continental TrueContact Tour, 79 vs 70 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology