Tests – · none yet Owners 80 · 19 reviews
Hankook Optimo H725 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Continental TrueContact Tour vs Hankook Optimo H725 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 19 + 36 owner reviews. How we score
TrueContact Tour is ahead, 76–55
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 48 · 36 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
76
Dry
TrueContact Tour +2353Why this score
Source TrueContact Tour Optimo H725 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 73 (est.) ≈ 58 (est.) Reviews found online 80 45 TrueContact Tour: 60% × 72.7 (est.) + 40% × 80 = 76
Optimo H725: 60% × 58.4 (est.) + 40% × 44.5 = 53
No road tests of dry for TrueContact Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Optimo H725. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
80
Wet
TrueContact Tour +2357Why this score
Source TrueContact Tour Optimo H725 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 78 (est.) ≈ 60 (est.) Reviews found online 84 52 TrueContact Tour: 60% × 77.8 (est.) + 40% × 84.1 = 80
Optimo H725: 60% × 59.9 (est.) + 40% × 52.1 = 57
No road tests of wet for TrueContact Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Optimo H725. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
70
Snow
TrueContact Tour +1555Why this score
Source TrueContact Tour Optimo H725 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 62 (est.) Reviews found online 70 46 TrueContact Tour: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 69.5 = 70
Optimo H725: 60% × 61.8 (est.) + 40% × 45.5 = 55
No road tests of snow for TrueContact Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
No road tests of snow for Optimo H725. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
74
Comfort
TrueContact Tour +2054Why this score
Source TrueContact Tour Optimo H725 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 79 40 TrueContact Tour: 60% × 70.9 (est.) + 40% × 79.1 = 74
Optimo H725: 60% × 64.1 (est.) + 40% × 39.8 = 54
No road tests of comfort for TrueContact Tour or Optimo H725. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
72
Noise
TrueContact Tour +1161Why this score
Source TrueContact Tour Optimo H725 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 78 52 TrueContact Tour: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 78.3 = 72
Optimo H725: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 52.3 = 61
No road tests of noise for TrueContact Tour or Optimo H725. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
75
Treadwear
TrueContact Tour +1956Why this score
Source TrueContact Tour Optimo H725 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 60 (est.) Reviews found online 81 49 TrueContact Tour: 60% × 70.4 (est.) + 40% × 81.1 = 75
Optimo H725: 60% × 60.4 (est.) + 40% × 48.8 = 56
No road tests of treadwear for TrueContact Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Optimo H725. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
78
Handling (owners)
TrueContact Tour +3246Why this score
Source TrueContact Tour Optimo H725 Reviews found online 78 46
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental TrueContact Tour | Hankook Optimo H725 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 76 | 55 |
| Dry | 76 | 53 |
| Wet | 80 | 57 |
| Snow | 70 | 55 |
| Comfort | 74 | 54 |
| Noise | 72 | 61 |
| Treadwear | 75 | 56 |
| Handling (owners) | 78 | 46 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
TrueContact Tour
Optimo H725
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A TrueContact Tour
Pros
- Extremely low road noise and a comfortable ride quality that absorbs bumps well
- Impressive tread life and overall mileage durability
- Reliable wet weather grip and cornering confidence
Cons
- Some users reported a noticeable drop in fuel economy
- Desire for improved water displacement grooves to better handle heavy rain
- Limited performance in deep winter or heavy snow conditions
Tire B Optimo H725
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental TrueContact Tour | B · Hankook Optimo H725 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season Premium Touring tires | All-Season tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | 11/32″ | 9/32″ |
| UTQG | 700 - 800 A A - B | 700 A B |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - White Wall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 44 - 51 psi | 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental TrueContact Tour
Hankook Optimo H725
Winner: Continental TrueContact Tour — better handling, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Continental TrueContact Tour rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 19 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Continental TrueContact Tour scores 78 vs 46 on handling.
Continental TrueContact Tour scores 76 vs 53 on dry.
Continental TrueContact Tour scores 80 vs 57 on wet.
Continental TrueContact Tour scores 74 vs 54 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
TrueContact Tour or Optimo H725?
Which is better in the wet, TrueContact Tour or Optimo H725?
Continental TrueContact Tour, 80 vs 57 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, TrueContact Tour or Optimo H725?
Continental TrueContact Tour, 76 vs 53 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, TrueContact Tour or Optimo H725?
Continental TrueContact Tour, 70 vs 55 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, TrueContact Tour or Optimo H725?
Continental TrueContact Tour, 72 vs 61 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, TrueContact Tour or Optimo H725?
Continental TrueContact Tour, 74 vs 54 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, TrueContact Tour or Optimo H725?
Continental TrueContact Tour, 75 vs 56 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology