tirewheelguide

Nexen N FERA SUR4 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Continental TrueContact Tour vs Nexen N FERA SUR4 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 19 + 6 owner reviews. How we score

TrueContact Tour is ahead, 77–62

Check price on Amazon · TrueContact Tour or N FERA SUR4 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Nexen N FERA SUR4
Tire BNexen

N FERA SUR4

Summer

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 57 · 6 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 76

    Dry

    TrueContact Tour +5
    71
    Why this score
    SourceTrueContact TourN FERA SUR4
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 73 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online8073

    TrueContact Tour: 60% × 72.7 (est.) + 40% × 80 = 76

    N FERA SUR4: 60% × 69.9 (est.) + 40% × 73.2 = 71

    No road tests of dry for TrueContact Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for N FERA SUR4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 80

    Wet

    TrueContact Tour +25
    55
    Why this score
    SourceTrueContact TourN FERA SUR4
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 78 (est.)≈ 59 (est.)
    Reviews found online8450

    TrueContact Tour: 60% × 77.8 (est.) + 40% × 84.1 = 80

    N FERA SUR4: 60% × 58.8 (est.) + 40% × 50.1 = 55

    No road tests of wet for TrueContact Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for N FERA SUR4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 70

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceTrueContact TourN FERA SUR4
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)–
    Reviews found online70–

    TrueContact Tour: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 69.5 = 70

    No road tests of snow for TrueContact Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 74

    Comfort

    TrueContact Tour +14
    60
    Why this score
    SourceTrueContact TourN FERA SUR4
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online7951

    TrueContact Tour: 60% × 70.9 (est.) + 40% × 79.1 = 74

    N FERA SUR4: 60% × 65.9 (est.) + 40% × 50.6 = 60

    No road tests of comfort for TrueContact Tour or N FERA SUR4. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 72

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceTrueContact TourN FERA SUR4
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online78–

    TrueContact Tour: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 78.3 = 72

    No road tests of noise for TrueContact Tour. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 75

    Treadwear

    TrueContact Tour +20
    55
    Why this score
    SourceTrueContact TourN FERA SUR4
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online8147

    TrueContact Tour: 60% × 70.4 (est.) + 40% × 81.1 = 75

    N FERA SUR4: 60% × 59.8 (est.) + 40% × 46.7 = 55

    No road tests of treadwear for TrueContact Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for N FERA SUR4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 78

    Handling (owners)

    TrueContact Tour +7
    71
    Why this score
    SourceTrueContact TourN FERA SUR4
    Reviews found online7871
Scores at a glance
CategoryContinental TrueContact TourNexen N FERA SUR4
Relative Score 77 62
Dry 76 71
Wet 80 55
Snow 70 –
Comfort 74 60
Noise 72 –
Treadwear 75 55
Handling (owners) 78 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

TrueContact Tour

N FERA SUR4

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A TrueContact Tour

Pros

  • Extremely low road noise and a comfortable ride quality that absorbs bumps well
  • Impressive tread life and overall mileage durability
  • Reliable wet weather grip and cornering confidence

Cons

  • Some users reported a noticeable drop in fuel economy
  • Desire for improved water displacement grooves to better handle heavy rain
  • Limited performance in deep winter or heavy snow conditions
All owner themes in the TrueContact Tour review

Tire B N FERA SUR4

Pros

  • Exceptional dry grip and track-day performance
  • Precise steering feedback and predictable handling
  • Cost-effective alternative to more expensive track tires

Cons

  • High level of road noise
  • Poor wet-weather performance and dangerous hydroplaning tendencies in heavy rain
  • Fast tread wear
All owner themes in the N FERA SUR4 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental TrueContact Tour B · Nexen N FERA SUR4
CategoryAll Season Premium Touring tiresSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Tread depth11/32″—
UTQG700 - 800 A A - B—
SidewallBlack Side Wall - White Wall—
Max pressure44 - 51 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental TrueContact Tour

Nexen N FERA SUR4

Winner: Continental TrueContact Tour — better wet, treadwear and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Continental TrueContact Tour rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 19 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Nexen N FERA SUR4 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 6 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental TrueContact Tour scores 80 vs 55 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Continental TrueContact Tour scores 75 vs 55 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Continental TrueContact Tour scores 74 vs 60 on comfort.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Continental TrueContact Tour scores 78 vs 71 on handling.

Tire A · Continental TrueContact Tour
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Nexen N FERA SUR4
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

TrueContact Tour or N FERA SUR4?

Which is better in the wet, TrueContact Tour or N FERA SUR4?

Continental TrueContact Tour, 80 vs 55 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, TrueContact Tour or N FERA SUR4?

Continental TrueContact Tour, 76 vs 71 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, TrueContact Tour or N FERA SUR4?

Continental TrueContact Tour, 74 vs 60 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, TrueContact Tour or N FERA SUR4?

Continental TrueContact Tour, 75 vs 55 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology