Tests – · none yet Owners 76 · 5 reviews
Continental WinterContact TS 790 vs Continental WinterContact TS 860 S — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 5 + 16 owner reviews. How we score
WinterContact TS 860 S leads, 76–74 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 71 · 1 test Owners 80 · 16 reviews
Best test result: #2 of 11 in 2019 19 Inch Performance Winter Tyre Test (dry handling)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
71
Dry
WinterContact TS 860 S +576Why this score
Source WinterContact TS 790 WinterContact TS 860 S Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 70 (est.) 73 Reviews found online 73 79 WinterContact TS 790: 60% × 69.9 (est.) + 40% × 72.6 = 71
WinterContact TS 860 S: 60% × 73 + 40% × 79.4 = 76
No road tests of dry for WinterContact TS 790. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
78
Wet
WinterContact TS 790 +375Why this score
Source WinterContact TS 790 WinterContact TS 860 S Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 76 (est.) 70 Reviews found online 81 83 WinterContact TS 790: 60% × 76.4 (est.) + 40% × 81.1 = 78
WinterContact TS 860 S: 60% × 70 + 40% × 82.9 = 75
No road tests of wet for WinterContact TS 790. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
–
Snow
No comparison74Why this score
Source WinterContact TS 790 WinterContact TS 860 S Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 71 Reviews found online – 78 WinterContact TS 860 S: 60% × 70.5 + 40% × 78.1 = 74
-
72
Comfort
WinterContact TS 860 S +577Why this score
Source WinterContact TS 790 WinterContact TS 860 S Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 73 81 WinterContact TS 790: 40% × 69.5 (est.) + 60% × 72.9 = 72
WinterContact TS 860 S: 40% × 71.2 (est.) + 60% × 81.2 = 77
No road tests of comfort for WinterContact TS 790. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for WinterContact TS 860 S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
–
Noise
No comparison70Why this score
Source WinterContact TS 790 WinterContact TS 860 S Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 73 Reviews found online – ≈ 66 (est.) WinterContact TS 860 S: 60% × 73.2 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 70
No owner ratings of noise for WinterContact TS 860 S. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
72
Treadwear
WinterContact TS 860 S +375Why this score
Source WinterContact TS 790 WinterContact TS 860 S Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 76 80 WinterContact TS 790: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.8 = 72
WinterContact TS 860 S: 60% × 71.2 (est.) + 40% × 79.7 = 75
No road tests of treadwear for WinterContact TS 790. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for WinterContact TS 860 S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
77
Handling (owners)
WinterContact TS 860 S +784Why this score
Source WinterContact TS 790 WinterContact TS 860 S Reviews found online 77 84 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison77Why this score
Source WinterContact TS 790 WinterContact TS 860 S Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 77
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental WinterContact TS 790 | Continental WinterContact TS 860 S |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 74 | 76 |
| Dry | 71 | 76 |
| Wet | 78 | 75 |
| Snow | – | 74 |
| Comfort | 72 | 77 |
| Noise | – | 70 |
| Treadwear | 72 | 75 |
| Handling (owners) | 77 | 84 |
| Efficiency | – | 77 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
WinterContact TS 790
WinterContact TS 860 S
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A WinterContact TS 790
Pros
- Exceptional tread longevity and durability
- Strong grip and stability in wet conditions
- High level of ride comfort
Cons
- Limited performance in heavy or deep snow conditions
- Not optimized for severe winter climates
Tire B WinterContact TS 860 S
Pros
- Exceptional handling and grip in wet, dry, and snow conditions
- Stiff sidewalls providing precise road feedback and cornering stability
- Summer-tire-like driving dynamics and confidence at low temperatures
Cons
- Long break-in (scrub-in) period required before optimal grip is reached
- Lateral grip in wet conditions can occasionally feel lacking during sudden maneuvers
- High price point
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental WinterContact TS 790 | B · Continental WinterContact TS 860 S |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter | Winter |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 1 | 92 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ | 16″ – 23″ |
| Tread depth | — | 10 - 11/32″ |
| Sidewall | — | Black Side Wall |
| Max pressure | — | 50 - 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental WinterContact TS 790
Continental WinterContact TS 860 S
Narrow edge: Continental WinterContact TS 860 S — better handling, dry and comfort. Pick the Continental WinterContact TS 790 if wet matters most to you. Continental WinterContact TS 790 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Continental WinterContact TS 860 S rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 16 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Continental WinterContact TS 860 S scores 84 vs 77 on handling.
Continental WinterContact TS 860 S scores 76 vs 71 on dry.
Continental WinterContact TS 860 S scores 77 vs 72 on comfort.
Continental WinterContact TS 790 scores 78 vs 75 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
WinterContact TS 790 or WinterContact TS 860 S?
Which is better in the wet, WinterContact TS 790 or WinterContact TS 860 S?
Continental WinterContact TS 790, 78 vs 75 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, WinterContact TS 790 or WinterContact TS 860 S?
Continental WinterContact TS 860 S, 76 vs 71 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, WinterContact TS 790 or WinterContact TS 860 S?
Continental WinterContact TS 860 S, 77 vs 72 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, WinterContact TS 790 or WinterContact TS 860 S?
Continental WinterContact TS 860 S, 75 vs 72 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology