Tests – · none yet Owners 83 · 12 reviews
Continental WinterContact TS 800 vs Toyo Observe GSi-6 HP — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 2 road tests and 12 + 14 owner reviews. How we score
WinterContact TS 800 is ahead, 78–71
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 69 · 2 tests Owners 73 · 14 reviews
Best test result: #5 of 20 in 2020 Nordic and Studded Winter Tyre Test (dry braking)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
77
Dry
WinterContact TS 800 +275Why this score
Source WinterContact TS 800 Observe GSi-6 HP Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 74 (est.) 73 Reviews found online 82 77 WinterContact TS 800: 60% × 73.8 (est.) + 40% × 82.1 = 77
Observe GSi-6 HP: 60% × 73 + 40% × 76.9 = 75
No road tests of dry for WinterContact TS 800. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
84
Wet
WinterContact TS 800 +975Why this score
Source WinterContact TS 800 Observe GSi-6 HP Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 80 (est.) 71 Reviews found online 89 81 WinterContact TS 800: 60% × 80.5 (est.) + 40% × 88.6 = 84
Observe GSi-6 HP: 60% × 71.5 + 40% × 80.8 = 75
No road tests of wet for WinterContact TS 800. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
75
Snow
WinterContact TS 800 +966Why this score
Source WinterContact TS 800 Observe GSi-6 HP Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 73 (est.) 60 Reviews found online 79 75 WinterContact TS 800: 60% × 73 (est.) + 40% × 78.5 = 75
Observe GSi-6 HP: 60% × 59.5 + 40% × 74.8 = 66
No road tests of snow for WinterContact TS 800. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
77
Comfort
WinterContact TS 800 +275Why this score
Source WinterContact TS 800 Observe GSi-6 HP Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 71 (est.) 77 Reviews found online 81 74 WinterContact TS 800: 40% × 71.2 (est.) + 60% × 81.3 = 77
Observe GSi-6 HP: 40% × 76.6 + 60% × 73.8 = 75
No road tests of comfort for WinterContact TS 800. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison69Why this score
Source WinterContact TS 800 Observe GSi-6 HP Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 72 Reviews found online – ≈ 66 (est.) Observe GSi-6 HP: 60% × 71.6 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 69
No owner ratings of noise for Observe GSi-6 HP. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
75
Treadwear
WinterContact TS 800 +1362Why this score
Source WinterContact TS 800 Observe GSi-6 HP Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 72 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 81 59 WinterContact TS 800: 60% × 71.6 (est.) + 40% × 80.7 = 75
Observe GSi-6 HP: 60% × 63.6 (est.) + 40% × 58.5 = 62
No road tests of treadwear for WinterContact TS 800. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Observe GSi-6 HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
85
Handling (owners)
WinterContact TS 800 +1075Why this score
Source WinterContact TS 800 Observe GSi-6 HP Reviews found online 85 75 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison66Why this score
Source WinterContact TS 800 Observe GSi-6 HP Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 66
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental WinterContact TS 800 | Toyo Observe GSi-6 HP |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 78 | 71 |
| Dry | 77 | 75 |
| Wet | 84 | 75 |
| Snow | 75 | 66 |
| Comfort | 77 | 75 |
| Noise | – | 69 |
| Treadwear | 75 | 62 |
| Handling (owners) | 85 | 75 |
| Efficiency | – | 66 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
WinterContact TS 800
Observe GSi-6 HP
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | WinterContact TS 800 | Observe GSi-6 HP | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #2/13 2012 European Tyre Test - 165/70 R14 | #12/20 2025 Studded, Friction and European Winter Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A WinterContact TS 800
Pros
- Exceptional grip and traction in deep, fresh, and compressed snow
- Reliable braking and handling performance on wet and icy surfaces
- Impressive tread longevity even under varied driving conditions
Cons
- Increased road noise compared to some summer tire models
- Reduced handling precision and performance when temperatures exceed 10°C
- Soft compound can feel less stable during aggressive dry-weather driving
Tire B Observe GSi-6 HP
Pros
- Exceptional traction and stability in snow and slush
- Impressive wet-weather performance and hydroplaning resistance
- Remarkably quiet ride quality for a winter tire
Cons
- Inconsistent tread life reports, with some users experiencing premature wear
- Occasional reports of structural failure or tread separation
- Slightly vague steering feel at lower speeds
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental WinterContact TS 800 | B · Toyo Observe GSi-6 HP |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter | Winter |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | — |
| Sizes available | 6 | 39 |
| Rim diameters | 13″ – 15″ | 16″ – 21″ |
| Tread depth | — | 11 - 12/32″ |
| Sidewall | — | Black Side Wall |
| Max pressure | — | 50 - 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 0 | 0 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental WinterContact TS 800
Toyo Observe GSi-6 HP
Winner: Continental WinterContact TS 800 — better treadwear, handling and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Continental WinterContact TS 800 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 12 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Continental WinterContact TS 800 scores 75 vs 62 on treadwear.
Continental WinterContact TS 800 scores 85 vs 75 on handling.
Continental WinterContact TS 800 scores 84 vs 75 on wet.
Continental WinterContact TS 800 scores 75 vs 66 on snow.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
WinterContact TS 800 or Observe GSi-6 HP?
Which is better in the wet, WinterContact TS 800 or Observe GSi-6 HP?
Continental WinterContact TS 800, 84 vs 75 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, WinterContact TS 800 or Observe GSi-6 HP?
Neither, by our numbers: 77 vs 75 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is better in snow, WinterContact TS 800 or Observe GSi-6 HP?
Continental WinterContact TS 800, 75 vs 66 on our snow score.
Which is more comfortable, WinterContact TS 800 or Observe GSi-6 HP?
Neither, by our numbers: 77 vs 75 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, WinterContact TS 800 or Observe GSi-6 HP?
Continental WinterContact TS 800, 75 vs 62 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology