Tests – · none yet Owners 50 · 7 reviews
Continental WinterContact TS 810 S vs Hankook Winter i*pike RS2 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 5 road tests and 7 + 5 owner reviews. How we score
Winter i*pike RS2 is ahead, 69–56
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 66 · 5 tests Owners 73 · 5 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 8 in 2019 Studded Winter Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
57
Dry
WinterContact TS 810 S +156Why this score
Source WinterContact TS 810 S Winter i*pike RS2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests ≈ 61 (est.) 49 Reviews found online 52 66 WinterContact TS 810 S: 60% × 61.2 (est.) + 40% × 51.5 = 57
Winter i*pike RS2: 60% × 49.2 + 40% × 65.9 = 56
No road tests of dry for WinterContact TS 810 S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
62
Wet
Winter i*pike RS2 +1173Why this score
Source WinterContact TS 810 S Winter i*pike RS2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests ≈ 64 (est.) 71 Reviews found online 59 76 WinterContact TS 810 S: 60% × 64.1 (est.) + 40% × 58.6 = 62
Winter i*pike RS2: 60% × 71 + 40% × 75.7 = 73
No road tests of wet for WinterContact TS 810 S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
51
Snow
Winter i*pike RS2 +2576Why this score
Source WinterContact TS 810 S Winter i*pike RS2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests ≈ 60 (est.) 76 Reviews found online 38 76 WinterContact TS 810 S: 60% × 60.2 (est.) + 40% × 38.1 = 51
Winter i*pike RS2: 60% × 75.9 + 40% × 76.4 = 76
No road tests of snow for WinterContact TS 810 S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
58
Comfort
Winter i*pike RS2 +1472Why this score
Source WinterContact TS 810 S Winter i*pike RS2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 79 Reviews found online 53 68 WinterContact TS 810 S: 40% × 65.6 (est.) + 60% × 53.2 = 58
Winter i*pike RS2: 40% × 79.2 + 60% × 67.5 = 72
No road tests of comfort for WinterContact TS 810 S. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison59Why this score
Source WinterContact TS 810 S Winter i*pike RS2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests – 55 Reviews found online – ≈ 66 (est.) Winter i*pike RS2: 60% × 54.6 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 59
No owner ratings of noise for Winter i*pike RS2. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
56
Treadwear
Winter i*pike RS2 +1672Why this score
Source WinterContact TS 810 S Winter i*pike RS2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 61 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 50 75 WinterContact TS 810 S: 60% × 60.6 (est.) + 40% × 50 = 56
Winter i*pike RS2: 60% × 69.5 (est.) + 40% × 74.9 = 72
No road tests of treadwear for WinterContact TS 810 S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Winter i*pike RS2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
52
Handling (owners)
Winter i*pike RS2 +2072Why this score
Source WinterContact TS 810 S Winter i*pike RS2 Reviews found online 52 72 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison73Why this score
Source WinterContact TS 810 S Winter i*pike RS2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests – 73
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental WinterContact TS 810 S | Hankook Winter i*pike RS2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 56 | 69 |
| Dry | 57 | 56 |
| Wet | 62 | 73 |
| Snow | 51 | 76 |
| Comfort | 58 | 72 |
| Noise | – | 59 |
| Treadwear | 56 | 72 |
| Handling (owners) | 52 | 72 |
| Efficiency | – | 73 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
WinterContact TS 810 S
Winter i*pike RS2
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A WinterContact TS 810 S
Pros
- Comfortable and smooth ride quality compared to summer tires
- Quieter performance and lack of tramlining
- Good durability and longevity over multiple winter seasons
Cons
- Extremely poor traction and cornering grip in snow and ice conditions
- Severe wet traction issues with wheel spin during cornering acceleration
- Pronounced understeer in fast dry corners and wet conditions
Tire B Winter i*pike RS2
Pros
- Exceptional traction and braking on snow and ice
- Strong side grip and predictable cornering limits
- High durability with secure stud retention over multiple years
Cons
- Poor steering feedback on dry tarmac
- Noticeable understeer in dry road conditions
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental WinterContact TS 810 S | B · Hankook Winter i*pike RS2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter | Winter |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 16 | — |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 19″ | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental WinterContact TS 810 S
Hankook Winter i*pike RS2
Winner: Hankook Winter i*pike RS2 — better snow, handling and treadwear. Where the Continental WinterContact TS 810 S is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Continental WinterContact TS 810 S rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Hankook Winter i*pike RS2 scores 76 vs 51 on snow.
Hankook Winter i*pike RS2 scores 72 vs 52 on handling.
Hankook Winter i*pike RS2 scores 72 vs 56 on treadwear.
Hankook Winter i*pike RS2 scores 72 vs 58 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
WinterContact TS 810 S or Winter i*pike RS2?
Which is better in the wet, WinterContact TS 810 S or Winter i*pike RS2?
Hankook Winter i*pike RS2, 73 vs 62 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, WinterContact TS 810 S or Winter i*pike RS2?
Neither, by our numbers: 57 vs 56 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is better in snow, WinterContact TS 810 S or Winter i*pike RS2?
Hankook Winter i*pike RS2, 76 vs 51 on our snow score.
Which is more comfortable, WinterContact TS 810 S or Winter i*pike RS2?
Hankook Winter i*pike RS2, 72 vs 58 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, WinterContact TS 810 S or Winter i*pike RS2?
Hankook Winter i*pike RS2, 72 vs 56 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology