Tests – · none yet Owners 56 · 5 reviews
Continental WinterContact TS 810 vs Nexen N'Fera AU7 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 5 + 15 owner reviews. How we score
N'Fera AU7 is ahead, 69–60
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · 1 test Owners 67 · 15 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
61
Dry
N'Fera AU7 +869Why this score
Source WinterContact TS 810 N'Fera AU7 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 58 69 WinterContact TS 810: 60% × 63.8 (est.) + 40% × 57.9 = 61
N'Fera AU7: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 69.1 = 69
No road tests of dry for WinterContact TS 810. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for N'Fera AU7. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
64
Wet
N'Fera AU7 +872Why this score
Source WinterContact TS 810 N'Fera AU7 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 62 72 WinterContact TS 810: 60% × 65.8 (est.) + 40% × 61.7 = 64
N'Fera AU7: 60% × 71.4 (est.) + 40% × 71.9 = 72
No road tests of wet for WinterContact TS 810. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for N'Fera AU7. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
–
Snow
No comparison65Why this score
Source WinterContact TS 810 N'Fera AU7 Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online – 61 N'Fera AU7: 60% × 67.4 (est.) + 40% × 60.6 = 65
No road tests of snow for N'Fera AU7. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
62
Comfort
N'Fera AU7 +567Why this score
Source WinterContact TS 810 N'Fera AU7 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 58 66 WinterContact TS 810: 40% × 66.6 (est.) + 60% × 58.3 = 62
N'Fera AU7: 40% × 68.2 (est.) + 60% × 66.1 = 67
No road tests of comfort for WinterContact TS 810. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for N'Fera AU7. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
–
Noise
No comparison66Why this score
Source WinterContact TS 810 N'Fera AU7 Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online – 65 N'Fera AU7: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.5 = 66
No road tests of noise for N'Fera AU7. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
56
Treadwear
N'Fera AU7 +763Why this score
Source WinterContact TS 810 N'Fera AU7 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 60 (est.) 63 Reviews found online 49 62 WinterContact TS 810: 60% × 60.3 (est.) + 40% × 49 = 56
N'Fera AU7: 60% × 62.9 + 40% × 62.3 = 63
No road tests of treadwear for WinterContact TS 810. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
53
Handling (owners)
N'Fera AU7 +1568Why this score
Source WinterContact TS 810 N'Fera AU7 Reviews found online 53 68
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental WinterContact TS 810 | Nexen N'Fera AU7 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 60 | 69 |
| Dry | 61 | 69 |
| Wet | 64 | 72 |
| Snow | – | 65 |
| Comfort | 62 | 67 |
| Noise | – | 66 |
| Treadwear | 56 | 63 |
| Handling (owners) | 53 | 68 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
WinterContact TS 810
N'Fera AU7
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A WinterContact TS 810
Pros
- Reliable traction in snow and icy conditions
- Strong performance in cold, wet weather
- Well-balanced handling characteristics across various road surfaces
Cons
- Performance degradation in warmer or dry conditions
- Inconsistent snow and ice performance reported by some users
- Poor customer service experiences associated with the brand
Tire B N'Fera AU7
Pros
- Exceptional value for the price point
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Strong wet, dry, and light snow traction
Cons
- Potential for premature wear or cupping reported by some users
- Prone to wandering or tracking poorly on metal bridge gratings
- Softer compounds may be susceptible to quicker aging in harsh climates
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental WinterContact TS 810 | B · Nexen N'Fera AU7 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter | All-Season Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 5 | 49 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 17″ | 16″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | — | 9/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 500 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 50,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 50 psi |
| Sizes in common | 2 | 2 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental WinterContact TS 810
Nexen N'Fera AU7
Winner: Nexen N'Fera AU7 — better handling, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Continental WinterContact TS 810 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Nexen N'Fera AU7 rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 15 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Nexen N'Fera AU7 scores 68 vs 53 on handling.
Nexen N'Fera AU7 scores 69 vs 61 on dry.
Nexen N'Fera AU7 scores 72 vs 64 on wet.
Nexen N'Fera AU7 scores 63 vs 56 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
WinterContact TS 810 or N'Fera AU7?
Which is better in the wet, WinterContact TS 810 or N'Fera AU7?
Nexen N'Fera AU7, 72 vs 64 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, WinterContact TS 810 or N'Fera AU7?
Nexen N'Fera AU7, 69 vs 61 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, WinterContact TS 810 or N'Fera AU7?
Nexen N'Fera AU7, 67 vs 62 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, WinterContact TS 810 or N'Fera AU7?
Nexen N'Fera AU7, 63 vs 56 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology