Tests 81 · 27 tests Owners 78 · 31 reviews
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs Michelin Alpin — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
WinterContact TS 870 P is ahead, 80–74
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
80
Dry
WinterContact TS 870 P +773Why this score
Source WinterContact TS 870 P Alpin Professional tests (TWG score) 82 – Reviews found online 77 75 -
88
Wet
WinterContact TS 870 P +880Why this score
Source WinterContact TS 870 P Alpin Professional tests (TWG score) 91 – Reviews found online 84 83 -
77
Snow
WinterContact TS 870 P +770Why this score
Source WinterContact TS 870 P Alpin Professional tests (TWG score) 78 – Reviews found online 76 70 -
82
Comfort
WinterContact TS 870 P +874Why this score
Source WinterContact TS 870 P Alpin Professional tests (TWG score) 84 – Reviews found online 80 78 -
74
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source WinterContact TS 870 P Alpin Professional tests (TWG score) 79 – -
72
Treadwear
Alpin +173Why this score
Source WinterContact TS 870 P Alpin Professional tests (TWG score) 70 – Reviews found online 75 77 -
80
Handling
WinterContact TS 870 P +575Why this score
Source WinterContact TS 870 P Alpin Reviews found online 80 75
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental WinterContact TS 870 P | Michelin Alpin |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 80 | 74 |
| Dry | 80 | 73 |
| Wet | 88 | 80 |
| Snow | 77 | 70 |
| Comfort | 82 | 74 |
| Noise | 74 | – |
| Treadwear | 72 | 73 |
| Handling | 80 | 75 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
WinterContact TS 870 P
Alpin
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A WinterContact TS 870 P
Pros
- Exceptionally low noise levels and high ride comfort
- Outstanding wet weather and slush performance, cutting through heavy rain effortlessly
- Balanced dry and cold-weather handling with impressive cornering stability
Cons
- Higher price point compared to some competitors
- Steering response and initial stiffness are slightly softer and less sporty than dedicated summer tires or some rivals
- Snow and ice traction can feel less exceptional or borderline inadequate for a small subset of users
Tire B Alpin
Pros
- Exceptional grip and traction on snow and ice
- Noticeable performance improvement in cold and wet conditions
- High level of ride comfort and low noise levels
Cons
- Higher price point compared to some competitors
- Can feel overly aggressive or sensitive on loose surfaces like gravel
- Limited feedback on dry-weather performance from most users
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental WinterContact TS 870 P | B · Michelin Alpin |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter | Winter |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 121 | — |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 23″ | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
Michelin Alpin
Winner: Continental WinterContact TS 870 P — better wet, comfort and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P scores 88 vs 80 on wet.
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P scores 82 vs 74 on comfort.
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P scores 80 vs 73 on dry.
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P scores 77 vs 70 on snow.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.