Tests – · none yet Owners 62 · 980 reviews
“Need tires, American made, based, operated. Cooper CS5 Ultra Touring”
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 980 + 81 owner reviews. How we score
AVID Ascend leads, 70–66 Narrow edge
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 62 · 980 reviews
“Need tires, American made, based, operated. Cooper CS5 Ultra Touring”
Tests – · none yet Owners 71 · 81 reviews
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | CS5 Ultra Touring | AVID Ascend |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 70 (est.) | ≈ 70 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 74 | 73 |
CS5 Ultra Touring: 60% × 70.3 (est.) + 40% × 73.6 = 72
AVID Ascend: 60% × 69.9 (est.) + 40% × 72.6 = 71
No road tests of dry for CS5 Ultra Touring. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for AVID Ascend. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
| Source | CS5 Ultra Touring | AVID Ascend |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 70 (est.) | ≈ 74 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 69 | 77 |
CS5 Ultra Touring: 60% × 69.9 (est.) + 40% × 69.3 = 70
AVID Ascend: 60% × 73.9 (est.) + 40% × 76.6 = 75
No road tests of wet for CS5 Ultra Touring. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for AVID Ascend. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
| Source | CS5 Ultra Touring | AVID Ascend |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 64 (est.) | ≈ 67 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 50 | 58 |
CS5 Ultra Touring: 60% × 64.1 (est.) + 40% × 50.4 = 59
AVID Ascend: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 58.1 = 63
No road tests of snow for CS5 Ultra Touring. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for AVID Ascend. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
| Source | CS5 Ultra Touring | AVID Ascend |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 67 (est.) | ≈ 69 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 63 | 73 |
CS5 Ultra Touring: 40% × 67.5 (est.) + 60% × 62.7 = 65
AVID Ascend: 40% × 69.4 (est.) + 60% × 72.5 = 71
No road tests of comfort for CS5 Ultra Touring. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for AVID Ascend. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
| Source | CS5 Ultra Touring | AVID Ascend |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 66 (est.) | ≈ 66 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 71 | 74 |
CS5 Ultra Touring: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 70.7 = 68
AVID Ascend: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 74.4 = 70
No road tests of noise for CS5 Ultra Touring or AVID Ascend. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | CS5 Ultra Touring | AVID Ascend |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 59 (est.) | ≈ 67 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 46 | 68 |
CS5 Ultra Touring: 60% × 59.1 (est.) + 40% × 46 = 54
AVID Ascend: 60% × 67.1 (est.) + 40% × 68.2 = 68
No road tests of treadwear for CS5 Ultra Touring. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for AVID Ascend. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
| Source | CS5 Ultra Touring | AVID Ascend |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 69 | 72 |
| Category | Cooper CS5 Ultra Touring | Yokohama AVID Ascend |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 66 | 70 |
| Dry | 72 | 71 |
| Wet | 70 | 75 |
| Snow | 59 | 63 |
| Comfort | 65 | 71 |
| Noise | 68 | 70 |
| Treadwear | 54 | 68 |
| Handling (owners) | 69 | 72 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
CS5 Ultra Touring
AVID Ascend
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Community sentiment for the Cooper CS5 Ultra Touring is predominantly positive, with owners regularly praising its quiet road manners, smooth ride comfort, and exceptional wet weather traction at a competitive price point. Some owners report concerns regarding rolling resistance, noted minor fuel economy drops, and cited premature or uneven tread wear falling short of mileage warranties. Overall, it is widely viewed as an accessible, high-value touring tire, though long-term durability opinions vary.
“Bought them and they are surprisingly good handling (on a Malibu) and quiet on the highway. We'll see about durability.”
“any experience with Cooper CS5 Ultra Touring A/S? My gf's AWD 2011 Mitsubishi Lancer (very fun but thirsty for its size car) have Cooper CS5 Ultra Touring A/S. The Lancer's OEM tires were very harsh and loud and surprisingly are rated as LRR in a painful attempt for Mitsubishi to get its economy up. Replacing the stock Yokos with Coopers really helped. Incredibly smooth and quiet, not to mention improves the driving dynamics immensely especially in rain. So my new 2018 Volt LT has only 5000k mile on it and I'm looking to swap and keep my Energy Savers A/S for Cooper CS5 Ultra touring for winter. My driving needs require strong winter grip as I live in a rural area with poorly maintained infrastructure. My second option are kelly A/S, both are budget friendly priced from my local small town mechanic.”
“I didn't see anyone recommending these tires in any of the tire threads, so I thought I'd share my experience with these as time goes by, as I think they're a nice value. I ended up getting them for $155 each installed. I researched extensively before deciding on these and had a hard time fine many negative reviews. I looked into Michelins and Pirellis, the usual recommended here, and some others. Quiet was my biggest concern, as I live in upstate South Carolina and weather isn't a huge issue. It does rain a lot here but my commute is only 8 miles round trip. I can't say that I had something great to compare to on this car, as the previous owner took great care of the car but put on some of the worst tires I've ever experienced. Champiros. Fronts we're almost bald after 17k miles. I've had the Cooper's on for a few days and holy cow I wasn't experiencing the full greatness of this car. It seriously rides like a new car. My initial impression of the CS5 Ultra Touring is that they're a very solid tire. Great ride. Great price. I will update after 5k miles and see if my experience changes.”
Based on 87 community posts
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
| Attribute | A · Cooper CS5 Ultra Touring | B · Yokohama AVID Ascend |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Season tire | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | 11/32″ | 12/32″ |
| UTQG | 500 - 640 A A | 740 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 75,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 44 - 51 psi | 51 psi |
Cooper CS5 Ultra Touring
Yokohama AVID Ascend
Narrow edge: Yokohama AVID Ascend — better treadwear, comfort and wet. Where the Cooper CS5 Ultra Touring is ahead, it is by less than 3 points.
Yokohama AVID Ascend scores 68 vs 54 on treadwear.
Yokohama AVID Ascend scores 71 vs 65 on comfort.
Yokohama AVID Ascend scores 75 vs 70 on wet.
Yokohama AVID Ascend scores 63 vs 59 on snow.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Yokohama AVID Ascend, 75 vs 70 on our wet score.
Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 71 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Yokohama AVID Ascend, 63 vs 59 on our snow score.
Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 70 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Yokohama AVID Ascend, 71 vs 65 on our comfort score.
Yokohama AVID Ascend, 68 vs 54 on our treadwear score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology