Tests – · none yet Owners 65 · 11 reviews
Cooper Discoverer A/TR looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Cooper Discoverer A/TR vs Kumho KL33 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 11 + 435 owner reviews. How we score
Discoverer A/TR is ahead, 66–59
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
68
Dry
Discoverer A/TR +860Why this score
Source Discoverer A/TR KL33 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 67 55 Discoverer A/TR: 60% × 67.7 (est.) + 40% × 67.4 = 68
KL33: 60% × 62.7 (est.) + 40% × 55.2 = 60
No road tests of dry for Discoverer A/TR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for KL33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
68
Wet
Discoverer A/TR +563Why this score
Source Discoverer A/TR KL33 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 67 60 Discoverer A/TR: 60% × 68.9 (est.) + 40% × 67.4 = 68
KL33: 60% × 64.6 (est.) + 40% × 59.5 = 63
No road tests of wet for Discoverer A/TR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for KL33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
65
Comfort
Discoverer A/TR +461Why this score
Source Discoverer A/TR KL33 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 63 57 Discoverer A/TR: 40% × 67.5 (est.) + 60% × 62.8 = 65
KL33: 40% × 66.3 (est.) + 60% × 56.9 = 61
No road tests of comfort for Discoverer A/TR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for KL33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
64
Treadwear
Discoverer A/TR +1252Why this score
Source Discoverer A/TR KL33 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 58 (est.) Reviews found online 62 44 Discoverer A/TR: 60% × 64.9 (est.) + 40% × 62.1 = 64
KL33: 60% × 58.2 (est.) + 40% × 43.5 = 52
No road tests of treadwear for Discoverer A/TR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for KL33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
59
Handling (owners)
Discoverer A/TR +257Why this score
Source Discoverer A/TR KL33 Reviews found online 59 57
Scores at a glance
| Category | Cooper Discoverer A/TR | Kumho KL33 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 66 | 59 |
| Dry | 68 | 60 |
| Wet | 68 | 63 |
| Comfort | 65 | 61 |
| Treadwear | 64 | 52 |
| Handling (owners) | 59 | 57 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Discoverer A/TR
KL33
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Discoverer A/TR
Pros
- Remarkably low road noise for an all-terrain tire with a deep, chunky tread.
- Excellent wet weather performance and resistance to aquaplaning.
- Long-lasting tread life with high mileage capabilities (some users exceeding 50,000 to 80,000+ kms).
Cons
- Some instances of severe edge chipping and cuts to the steel when used on rough outback gravel roads.
- Tramlining effects in the steering as the tires wear down.
- Off-road capability diminishes noticeably as the tread wears past a certain point.
Tire B KL33
Pros
- Good value for money with competitive pricing
- Strong initial dry and wet grip/traction
- Comfortable and smooth ride quality
Cons
- Premature tread wear and short lifespan
- Serious structural concerns including tread chipping, chunking, and delamination
- Road noise increases significantly as the tire wears down
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Cooper Discoverer A/TR | B · Kumho KL33 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Terrain tire | Summer |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | — | 18 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 20″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
Cooper Discoverer A/TR
Kumho KL33
Winner: Cooper Discoverer A/TR — better treadwear, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Cooper Discoverer A/TR rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Cooper Discoverer A/TR scores 64 vs 52 on treadwear.
Cooper Discoverer A/TR scores 68 vs 60 on dry.
Cooper Discoverer A/TR scores 68 vs 63 on wet.
Cooper Discoverer A/TR scores 65 vs 61 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Discoverer A/TR or KL33?
Which is better in the wet, Discoverer A/TR or KL33?
Cooper Discoverer A/TR, 68 vs 63 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Discoverer A/TR or KL33?
Cooper Discoverer A/TR, 68 vs 60 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Discoverer A/TR or KL33?
Cooper Discoverer A/TR, 65 vs 61 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Discoverer A/TR or KL33?
Cooper Discoverer A/TR, 64 vs 52 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology