Head-to-head Updated

Cooper ProControl vs Hankook Kinergy PT H737 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 171 + 446 owner reviews. How we score

ProControl leads, 78–74 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Cooper ProControl
Tire ACooper

ProControl

All-Season tire

± 7

Tests – · none yet Owners 77 · 171 reviews

Hankook Kinergy PT H737
Tire BHankook

Kinergy PT H737

All-Season tire

± 7

Tests – · 1 test Owners 76 · 446 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 8 in 2022 Consumer Reports All-Season Tires (tested tread life (miles))

“I have those on my mazda now. They ride well and wet traction is good. Going on my elantra this fall.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 77

    Dry

    ProControl +4
    73
    Why this score
    SourceProControlKinergy PT H737
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 74 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online8276

    ProControl: 60% × 73.7 (est.) + 40% × 81.7 = 77

    Kinergy PT H737: 60% × 71.1 (est.) + 40% × 75.5 = 73

    No road tests of dry for ProControl. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for Kinergy PT H737. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 81

    Wet

    ProControl +4
    77
    Why this score
    SourceProControlKinergy PT H737
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 78 (est.)≈ 75 (est.)
    Reviews found online8479

    ProControl: 60% × 78.2 (est.) + 40% × 84.3 = 81

    Kinergy PT H737: 60% × 75.4 (est.) + 40% × 79.1 = 77

    No road tests of wet for ProControl. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Kinergy PT H737. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 55

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceProControlKinergy PT H737
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 62 (est.)–
    Reviews found online44–

    ProControl: 60% × 62.2 (est.) + 40% × 44.4 = 55

    No road tests of snow for ProControl. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 75

    Comfort

    ProControl +4
    71
    Why this score
    SourceProControlKinergy PT H737
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online7772

    ProControl: 40% × 70.5 (est.) + 60% × 77.2 = 75

    Kinergy PT H737: 40% × 69.5 (est.) + 60% × 72.4 = 71

    No road tests of comfort for ProControl. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Kinergy PT H737. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 72

    Noise

    ProControl +3
    69
    Why this score
    SourceProControlKinergy PT H737
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online7972

    ProControl: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 79.4 = 72

    Kinergy PT H737: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 71.9 = 69

    No road tests of noise for ProControl or Kinergy PT H737. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 76

    Treadwear

    Kinergy PT H737 +1
    77
    Why this score
    SourceProControlKinergy PT H737
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 72 (est.)76
    Reviews found online8278

    ProControl: 60% × 72 (est.) + 40% × 81.8 = 76

    Kinergy PT H737: 60% × 76.1 + 40% × 78.3 = 77

    No road tests of treadwear for ProControl. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 78

    Handling (owners)

    ProControl +8
    70
    Why this score
    SourceProControlKinergy PT H737
    Reviews found online7870
Scores at a glance
Cooper ProControl vs Hankook Kinergy PT H737: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryCooper ProControlHankook Kinergy PT H737
Relative Score 78 74
Dry 77 73
Wet 81 77
Snow 55 –
Comfort 75 71
Noise 72 69
Treadwear 76 77
Handling (owners) 78 70

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

ProControl

± 7

Kinergy PT H737

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ProControl

Pros

  • Significantly lower cabin noise compared to OEM or competitor tires
  • Smooth and comfortable ride quality for daily commuting and long road trips
  • Strong traction and stability in rain and standing water

Cons

  • Difficulties achieving proper wheel balance, leading to vibrations or shimmies at highway speeds
  • Frustrating manufacturer rebate fulfillment process
  • Occasional reports of reduced fuel economy due to tire weight
All owner themes in the ProControl review

Tire B Kinergy PT H737

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Cooper ProControl

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Hankook Kinergy PT H737

Positive

Community sentiment toward the Hankook Kinergy PT H737 is consistently positive, with users frequently praising its impressive tread life, comfortable ride, and solid fuel economy. Owners highlight strong everyday commuting performance in wet and dry conditions, noting it as a high-value purchase, though some suggest it is not meant for aggressive driving in heavy rain. Several consumers are prospective buyers attracted by promotional pricing and the 90,000-mile tread warranty.

Top themes
#long tread life#quiet and comfortable ride#fuel efficiency#good wet and dry traction#value and pricing#commuting performance

Based on 14 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Cooper ProControl B · Hankook Kinergy PT H737
CategoryAll-Season tireAll-Season tire
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available6662
Rim diameters16″ – 22″15″ – 19″
Tread depth10 - 12/32″10/32″
UTQG600 - 740 A A - B800 A A
Treadwear warranty—75,000 mi
SidewallBlack Side WallBlackwall
Max pressure44 - 51 psi51 psi
Sizes in common3131

Which one should you actually buy?

Cooper ProControl

Hankook Kinergy PT H737

Narrow edge: Cooper ProControl — better handling, dry and wet. Where the Hankook Kinergy PT H737 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Cooper ProControl scores 78 vs 70 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Cooper ProControl scores 77 vs 73 on dry.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Cooper ProControl scores 81 vs 77 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Cooper ProControl scores 75 vs 71 on comfort.

Tire A · Cooper ProControl
Tire B · Hankook Kinergy PT H737

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ProControl or Kinergy PT H737?

Which is better in the wet, ProControl or Kinergy PT H737?

Cooper ProControl, 81 vs 77 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, ProControl or Kinergy PT H737?

Cooper ProControl, 77 vs 73 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, ProControl or Kinergy PT H737?

Cooper ProControl, 72 vs 69 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, ProControl or Kinergy PT H737?

Cooper ProControl, 75 vs 71 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, ProControl or Kinergy PT H737?

Neither, by our numbers: 76 vs 77 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology