Head-to-head Updated

Kumho Solus TA51 plus vs Hankook Kinergy PT H737 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 2 + 1 road tests and 0 + 446 owner reviews. How we score

Kinergy PT H737 leads, 74–70 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kumho Solus TA51 plus
Tire AKumho

Solus TA51 plus

All-Season tire

± 9

Tests 71 · 2 tests Owners – · none yet

Best test result: #2 of 9 in Is Expensive Better? 2026 AutoView Korean All-Season Tyre Test (dry circle speed)

Hankook Kinergy PT H737
Tire BHankook

Kinergy PT H737

All-Season tire

± 8

Tests – · 1 test Owners 76 · 446 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 8 in 2022 Consumer Reports All-Season Tires (tested tread life (miles))

“I have those on my mazda now. They ride well and wet traction is good. Going on my elantra this fall.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 69

    Dry

    Kinergy PT H737 +4
    73
    Why this score
    SourceSolus TA51 plusKinergy PT H737
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests70≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online≈ 69 (est.)76

    Solus TA51 plus: 60% × 69.6 + 40% × 68.6 (est.) = 69

    Kinergy PT H737: 60% × 71.1 (est.) + 40% × 75.5 = 73

    No owner ratings of dry for Solus TA51 plus. The owner half is estimated from its road-test score, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for Kinergy PT H737. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 71

    Wet

    Kinergy PT H737 +6
    77
    Why this score
    SourceSolus TA51 plusKinergy PT H737
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests71≈ 75 (est.)
    Reviews found online≈ 71 (est.)79

    Solus TA51 plus: 60% × 71.1 + 40% × 70.9 (est.) = 71

    Kinergy PT H737: 60% × 75.3 (est.) + 40% × 79 = 77

    No owner ratings of wet for Solus TA51 plus. The owner half is estimated from its road-test score, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Kinergy PT H737. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 68

    Comfort

    Kinergy PT H737 +3
    71
    Why this score
    SourceSolus TA51 plusKinergy PT H737
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests68≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online≈ 69 (est.)72

    Solus TA51 plus: 40% × 68 + 60% × 68.5 (est.) = 68

    Kinergy PT H737: 40% × 69.4 (est.) + 60% × 72.3 = 71

    No owner ratings of comfort for Solus TA51 plus. The owner half is estimated from its road-test score, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Kinergy PT H737. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  4. 71

    Noise

    Solus TA51 plus +2
    69
    Why this score
    SourceSolus TA51 plusKinergy PT H737
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests75≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)72

    Solus TA51 plus: 60% × 74.8 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 71

    Kinergy PT H737: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 71.9 = 69

    No owner ratings of noise for Solus TA51 plus. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

    No road tests of noise for Kinergy PT H737. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Treadwear

    No comparison
    77
    Why this score
    SourceSolus TA51 plusKinergy PT H737
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests–76
    Reviews found online–78

    Kinergy PT H737: 60% × 76.1 + 40% × 78.3 = 77

  6. –

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    70
    Why this score
    SourceSolus TA51 plusKinergy PT H737
    Reviews found online–70
Scores at a glance
Kumho Solus TA51 plus vs Hankook Kinergy PT H737: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryKumho Solus TA51 plusHankook Kinergy PT H737
Relative Score 70 74
Dry 69 73
Wet 71 77
Comfort 68 71
Noise 71 69
Treadwear – 77
Handling (owners) – 70

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 9

Solus TA51 plus

± 8

Kinergy PT H737

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategorySolus TA51 plusKinergy PT H737ΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #1/5 2026 AutoView Mid-Range Comfort Tyre Test #4/8 2022 Consumer Reports All-Season Tires – Different tests

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Kumho Solus TA51 plus

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Hankook Kinergy PT H737

Positive

Community sentiment toward the Hankook Kinergy PT H737 is consistently positive, with users frequently praising its impressive tread life, comfortable ride, and solid fuel economy. Owners highlight strong everyday commuting performance in wet and dry conditions, noting it as a high-value purchase, though some suggest it is not meant for aggressive driving in heavy rain. Several consumers are prospective buyers attracted by promotional pricing and the 90,000-mile tread warranty.

Top themes
#long tread life#quiet and comfortable ride#fuel efficiency#good wet and dry traction#value and pricing#commuting performance

Based on 14 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Solus TA51 plus B · Hankook Kinergy PT H737
CategoryAll-Season tireAll-Season tire
Vehicle type—Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available262
Rim diameters17″ – 19″15″ – 19″
Tread depth—10/32″
UTQG—800 A A
Treadwear warranty—75,000 mi
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho Solus TA51 plus

Hankook Kinergy PT H737

Narrow edge: Hankook Kinergy PT H737 — better wet, dry and comfort. Where the Kumho Solus TA51 plus is ahead, it is by less than 3 points.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Hankook Kinergy PT H737 scores 77 vs 71 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Hankook Kinergy PT H737 scores 73 vs 69 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Hankook Kinergy PT H737 scores 71 vs 68 on comfort.

Tire A · Kumho Solus TA51 plus
Tire B · Hankook Kinergy PT H737

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Solus TA51 plus or Kinergy PT H737?

Which is better in the wet, Solus TA51 plus or Kinergy PT H737?

Hankook Kinergy PT H737, 77 vs 71 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Solus TA51 plus or Kinergy PT H737?

Hankook Kinergy PT H737, 73 vs 69 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, Solus TA51 plus or Kinergy PT H737?

Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 69 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Solus TA51 plus or Kinergy PT H737?

Hankook Kinergy PT H737, 71 vs 68 on our comfort score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology