tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Cooper WeatherMaster SA2+ vs General Grabber A/TX — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 6 + 0 road tests and 6 + 373 owner reviews. How we score

Grabber A/TX is ahead, 68–60

Check price on Amazon · Grabber A/TX or WeatherMaster SA2+ on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Cooper WeatherMaster SA2+
Tire ACooper

WeatherMaster SA2+

Winter

± 8

Tests 57 · 6 tests Owners 63 · 6 reviews

Best test result: #2 of 20 in 2020 Auto Bild Performance Winter Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)

General Grabber A/TX
Tire BGeneral

Grabber A/TX

All-Terrain tire

± 7

Tests – · none yet Owners 68 · 373 reviews

“275/60r20 General Grabber A/Tx Just thought I'd share what my truck looks like with a slightly larger tire size in case anyone wondered. No level, just stock. Good looking tires in my opinion.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 53

    Dry

    Grabber A/TX +15
    68
    Why this score
    SourceWeatherMaster SA2+Grabber A/TX
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests50≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online5768

    WeatherMaster SA2+: 60% × 50.3 + 40% × 57.1 = 53

    Grabber A/TX: 60% × 67.9 (est.) + 40% × 67.9 = 68

    No road tests of dry for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 75

    Wet

    WeatherMaster SA2+ +2
    73
    Why this score
    SourceWeatherMaster SA2+Grabber A/TX
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / – tests81≈ 73 (est.)
    Reviews found online6774

    WeatherMaster SA2+: 60% × 80.5 + 40% × 66.6 = 75

    Grabber A/TX: 60% × 72.6 (est.) + 40% × 74.1 = 73

    No road tests of wet for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 53

    Snow

    Grabber A/TX +15
    68
    Why this score
    SourceWeatherMaster SA2+Grabber A/TX
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / – tests44≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6767

    WeatherMaster SA2+: 60% × 43.6 + 40% × 66.5 = 53

    Grabber A/TX: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 66.8 = 68

    No road tests of snow for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 64

    Comfort

    WeatherMaster SA2+ +3
    61
    Why this score
    SourceWeatherMaster SA2+Grabber A/TX
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6258

    WeatherMaster SA2+: 40% × 67.2 (est.) + 60% × 61.6 = 64

    Grabber A/TX: 40% × 66.5 (est.) + 60% × 58.1 = 61

    No road tests of comfort for WeatherMaster SA2+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 62

    Noise

    Grabber A/TX +2
    64
    Why this score
    SourceWeatherMaster SA2+Grabber A/TX
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests60≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)60

    WeatherMaster SA2+: 60% × 59.7 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 62

    Grabber A/TX: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 59.6 = 64

    No owner ratings of noise for WeatherMaster SA2+. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

    No road tests of noise for Grabber A/TX. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 56

    Treadwear

    Grabber A/TX +14
    70
    Why this score
    SourceWeatherMaster SA2+Grabber A/TX
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests51≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6372

    WeatherMaster SA2+: 60% × 51 + 40% × 63.4 = 56

    Grabber A/TX: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 72.4 = 70

    No road tests of treadwear for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 53

    Handling (owners)

    Grabber A/TX +6
    59
    Why this score
    SourceWeatherMaster SA2+Grabber A/TX
    Reviews found online5359
  8. 56

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceWeatherMaster SA2+Grabber A/TX
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests56–
Scores at a glance
CategoryCooper WeatherMaster SA2+General Grabber A/TX
Relative Score 60 68
Dry 53 68
Wet 75 73
Snow 53 68
Comfort 64 61
Noise 62 64
Treadwear 56 70
Handling (owners) 53 59
Efficiency 56 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

WeatherMaster SA2+

± 7

Grabber A/TX

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A WeatherMaster SA2+

Pros

  • Strong value for the price, with several reviewers saying it is hard to beat and would buy again
  • Good wet-weather grip and stability, with a comfortable, soft ride
  • Capable in cold conditions and light or easy snow, and usable across mixed wet, dry, snow and ice on a long trip

Cons

  • Snow and ice performance is only average in heavy snow or on ice, with one reviewer moving to a Nordic-compound tire for extra grip
  • Handling and road feedback criticized, with one reviewer describing fast cornering as scary despite good grip
  • Dry performance is limited, as the tire reportedly overheats quickly and loses grip when driven spiritedly
All owner themes in the WeatherMaster SA2+ review

Tire B Grabber A/TX

Pros

  • Exceptional winter and snow traction (3-peak mountain snowflake rated)
  • Impressively low road noise and high ride comfort for an aggressive all-terrain tire
  • Strong wet and dry road grip with confident handling

Cons

  • Noticeable decrease in fuel economy (MPG drop)
  • Tread tends to pick up and throw small stones and pebbles
  • Mixed reviews on long-term treadwear and longevity
All owner themes in the Grabber A/TX review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Cooper WeatherMaster SA2+

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

General Grabber A/TX

Positive

Community sentiment toward the General Grabber A/TX is largely positive, with owners frequently praising its winter traction on snow and ice as well as its quiet highway ride. Buyers appreciate its availability in lighter standard load ratings and competitive pricing compared to rivals like the BFG KO2. Minor drawbacks cited include fuel economy loss with heavier LT versions and a tendency for the tread to pick up and fling gravel rocks.

r/f150 ·14 upvotes ·2021-09-13

“Thoughts on the “General Grabber A/TX” Tire? I’m thinking about getting it in a 33” SL rated 275/70r18. This tire comes in at 46Lbs which is super light. $915ish for 4! It’s the only 33”, snow rated, All Terrain, C/SL load range I could find. All the other 33”s are E rated coming in around 60lbs.”
ram-trx.com ·3 upvotes ·2025-01-03

“We finally go out first snow storm of winter. We have 8” of fresh snow on the ground, and below that a half an inch of ice (it rained first then snowed). Initial impressions of the General Grabber A/Tx is good. Way quieter than stock tires on the highway, and good traction on snow and ice.”
5thgenrams.com ·2019-12-14

“Not sure where those ratings are from but all the ratings I have seen on the tire have been on par with other at tires. all 4 cost me 765 installed. My traction in NEPA has been excellent in the snow and wet.”
Top themes
#Snow and ice traction#Highway road noise#Standard load availability#Fuel economy impact#Rock retention and throwing#Ride quality and PSI

Based on 37 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Cooper WeatherMaster SA2+ B · General Grabber A/TX
CategoryWinterAll-Terrain tire
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Sizes available—44
Rim diameters—15″ – 22″
Tread depth—14 - 17/32″
UTQG—640 A A - B
Sidewall—Black Side Wall - Raised White Lettering
Max pressure—35 - 80 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Cooper WeatherMaster SA2+

General Grabber A/TX

Winner: General Grabber A/TX — better dry, snow and treadwear. Pick the Cooper WeatherMaster SA2+ if comfort matters most to you.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

General Grabber A/TX scores 68 vs 53 on dry.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

General Grabber A/TX scores 68 vs 53 on snow.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

General Grabber A/TX scores 70 vs 56 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

General Grabber A/TX scores 59 vs 53 on handling.

Tire A · Cooper WeatherMaster SA2+
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · General Grabber A/TX
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

WeatherMaster SA2+ or Grabber A/TX?

Which is better in the wet, WeatherMaster SA2+ or Grabber A/TX?

Neither, by our numbers: 75 vs 73 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, WeatherMaster SA2+ or Grabber A/TX?

General Grabber A/TX, 68 vs 53 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, WeatherMaster SA2+ or Grabber A/TX?

General Grabber A/TX, 68 vs 53 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, WeatherMaster SA2+ or Grabber A/TX?

Neither, by our numbers: 62 vs 64 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, WeatherMaster SA2+ or Grabber A/TX?

Cooper WeatherMaster SA2+, 64 vs 61 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, WeatherMaster SA2+ or Grabber A/TX?

General Grabber A/TX, 70 vs 56 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology