Tests 61 · 12 tests Owners 70 · 17 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 16 in 2018 Test World Summer Tyre Test (noise)
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 12 + 14 road tests and 17 + 2,521 owner reviews. How we score
Ventus Prime 4 is ahead, 75–65
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 61 · 12 tests Owners 70 · 17 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 16 in 2018 Test World Summer Tyre Test (noise)
Tests 77 · 14 tests Owners 71 · 2,521 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 21 in 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (dry handling)
“Simbolul cu mașina și fulgerul de pe Hankook Ventus Prime 4 arată că anvelopa e compatibilă și cu mașini electrice (EV), nu că e destinată exclusiv lor. Poate fi folosită fără probleme și pe mașini cu motor termic.”
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Zeon CS8 | Ventus Prime 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 12 / 12 tests | 54 | 83 |
| Reviews found online | 72 | 73 |
| Dry Braking (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 0–3 | 92% | 99% |
Zeon CS8: 60% × 53.6 + 40% × 72.2 = 61
Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 82.7 + 40% × 73 = 79
| Source | Zeon CS8 | Ventus Prime 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 12 / 13 tests | 73 | 79 |
| Reviews found online | 74 | 75 |
| Straight Aquaplaning (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 93% | 90% |
| Wet Braking (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 1–2 | 88% | 96% |
| Wet Braking (concrete) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 | 94% | 99% |
Zeon CS8: 60% × 73.3 + 40% × 73.6 = 73
Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 78.6 + 40% × 74.5 = 77
| Source | Zeon CS8 | Ventus Prime 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests | ≈ 69 (est.) | 70 |
| Reviews found online | 70 | 67 |
Zeon CS8: 40% × 68.9 (est.) + 60% × 70 = 70
Ventus Prime 4: 40% × 70.3 + 60% × 67.4 = 69
No road tests of comfort for Zeon CS8. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
| Source | Zeon CS8 | Ventus Prime 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / 8 tests | 76 | 58 |
| Reviews found online | ≈ 66 (est.) | ≈ 66 (est.) |
Zeon CS8: 60% × 75.7 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 72
Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 57.6 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 61
No owner ratings of noise for Zeon CS8 or Ventus Prime 4. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
| Source | Zeon CS8 | Ventus Prime 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 6 tests | 52 | 79 |
| Reviews found online | 66 | 67 |
| Abrasion (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 | 36% | 52% |
| Wear (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 | 44% | 59% |
Zeon CS8: 60% × 52.2 + 40% × 66 = 58
Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 78.5 + 40% × 66.9 = 74
| Source | Zeon CS8 | Ventus Prime 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 69 | 72 |
| Source | Zeon CS8 | Ventus Prime 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / 9 tests | 42 | 84 |
| Fuel Consumption (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 | 93% | 95% |
| Category | Cooper Zeon CS8 | Hankook Ventus Prime 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 65 | 75 |
| Dry | 61 | 79 |
| Wet | 73 | 77 |
| Comfort | 70 | 69 |
| Noise | 72 | 61 |
| Treadwear | 58 | 74 |
| Handling (owners) | 69 | 72 |
| Efficiency | 42 | 84 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Zeon CS8
Ventus Prime 4
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
In the overall rankings of 3 tests that ran both, Cooper Zeon CS8 finished ahead 0 times and Hankook Ventus Prime 4 3 times.
| Discipline | Category | Zeon CS8 | Ventus Prime 4 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 92% | 99% | −7.0 | 0–3 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2024 Summer Tyre Market Overview · 205/55 R16 |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 98% #10/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | 99% #6/20 · 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Dry Handling (tester's mark) | Dry | 78% #8/8 · 2019 Mid Range Tyre Test | 90% #4/14 · 2025 Summer and All Season Combined Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Straight Aquaplaning | Wet | 93% | 90% | +3.8 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test · 205/55 R16 |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 88% | 96% | −8.0 | 1–2 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2024 Summer Tyre Market Overview · 205/55 R16 |
| Wet Braking (concrete) | Wet | 94% | 99% | −5.6 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test · 205/55 R16 |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 97% #9/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | 99% #2/8 · 2025 Moottori Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Handling (tester's mark) | Wet | 94% #6/8 · 2019 Mid Range Tyre Test | 90% #4/14 · 2025 Summer and All Season Combined Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Noise | Noise | 98% #4/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | 99% #4/8 · 2025 Moottori Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Abrasion | Treadwear | 36% | 52% | −15.9 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test · 205/55 R16 |
| Wear | Treadwear | 44% | 59% | −14.9 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test · 205/55 R16 |
| Fuel Consumption | Efficiency | 93% | 95% | −1.6 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test · 205/55 R16 |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 86% #6/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | 95% #10/14 · 2025 Summer and All Season Combined Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Price | Cost | 68% #5/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | 69% #9/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Total Cost of Ownership | Cost | #20/20 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test | #4/20 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Value | Cost | 39% | 49% | −9.6 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test · 205/55 R16 |
| Grass Traction | Off-road | 93% #4/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | 83% #8/12 · 2023 Best SUV Tyres Tested | – | Different tests |
| Mud Traction | Off-road | 93% #3/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | 86% #8/12 · 2023 Best SUV Tyres Tested | – | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #33/55 | #4/55 | – | 0–3 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2024 Summer Tyre Market Overview · 205/55 R16 |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Community opinion on the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 is largely positive, with drivers viewing it as a comfortable, quiet, and capable touring tire. Users frequently praise its strong dry and wet performance alongside its compelling price-to-performance ratio compared to premium alternatives like Michelin. Some uncertainties exist regarding long-term tread wear and slight fuel economy impacts, but owners generally report satisfactory everyday reliability.
“Found a cut on one of my tires, is it 100% cooked? Three month old Hankook Ventus Prime 4 and I found a cut/split. It’s holding air fine but it is cooked?”
“Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs Kumho Ecsta HS52? Hey there! Went to this reddit after reading a lot of reviews on the website, a bit of a newbie in general. I have read about many models and settled on 2 possible ones due to pricing and availability in my country (not looking for any other options). In my price range and requirements I've settled on Ventus Prime 4 initially (50% cheaper than Primacy that my car came stock with), but have also seen some good stuff said about HS52. I was quite settled on the first one since it scored very well in 2022 Autobild review, but now that 2024 came out a lot of numbers are completely different (predicted tread life alone took a huge dive) and Hankook is now 4 positions lower than Kumho. To add to this, Hankook was only 10% more expensive thank Kumho in my country, but now there was a price drop and and now there is 20% price difference, so set of Kumhos comes out noticeable cheaper. Spec wise they seems very similar with some trade-offs in different departments. I'm not really looking to save as much money as possible, but with latest reviews I'm not sure if there is any improvement worth paying for. Any thoughts? Thanks. Read more”
“Top top top guma, stavio prosle godine kad sam kupio auto, odmah na Kupres isao, snijega i leda bilo dosta, ali izdale me nisu Imam i ljetne hankook ventus prime 4 isto odlicna guma”
Based on 41 community posts
| Attribute | A · Cooper Zeon CS8 | B · Hankook Ventus Prime 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | — |
| Sizes available | — | 66 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 20″ |
| UTQG | — | 200 - 420 A A |
Cooper Zeon CS8
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Winner: Hankook Ventus Prime 4 — better efficiency, dry and treadwear. Pick the Cooper Zeon CS8 if noise matters most to you.
Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 84 vs 42 on efficiency.
Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 79 vs 61 on dry.
Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 74 vs 58 on treadwear.
Cooper Zeon CS8 scores 72 vs 61 on noise.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Hankook Ventus Prime 4, 77 vs 73 on our wet score.
Hankook Ventus Prime 4, 79 vs 61 on our dry score.
Cooper Zeon CS8, 72 vs 61 on our noise score.
Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 69 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Hankook Ventus Prime 4, 74 vs 58 on our treadwear score.
Hankook Ventus Prime 4, 84 vs 42 on our efficiency score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology