Cooper Zeon RS3-A looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Cooper Zeon RS3-A vs Kumho Ecsta PS71 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 14 road tests and 26 + 8,191 owner reviews. How we score

Ecsta PS71 is ahead, 70–65

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Cooper Zeon RS3-A
Tire ACooper

Zeon RS3-A

Ultra High Performance All Season tire

± 8

Tests – · none yet Owners 61 · 26 reviews

Kumho Ecsta PS71
Tire BKumho

Ecsta PS71

Summer

± 5

Tests 68 · 14 tests Owners 69 · 8,191 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 18 in 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)

“Those are Kumho Ecsta PS71s, thread width is supposed to be 245mm, the actual one is hardly 235. How so?”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 64

    Dry

    Ecsta PS71 +11
    75
    Why this score
    SourceZeon RS3-AEcsta PS71
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 12 tests≈ 66 (est.)78
    Reviews found online6272

    Zeon RS3-A: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 62.2 = 64

    Ecsta PS71: 60% × 77.6 + 40% × 71.7 = 75

    No road tests of dry for Zeon RS3-A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 65

    Wet

    Ecsta PS71 +20
    85
    Why this score
    SourceZeon RS3-AEcsta PS71
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 13 tests≈ 66 (est.)92
    Reviews found online6375

    Zeon RS3-A: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 62.9 = 65

    Ecsta PS71: 60% × 91.8 + 40% × 74.6 = 85

    No road tests of wet for Zeon RS3-A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 57

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceZeon RS3-AEcsta PS71
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 63 (est.)–
    Reviews found online47–

    Zeon RS3-A: 60% × 63.1 (est.) + 40% × 47.1 = 57

    No road tests of snow for Zeon RS3-A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 60

    Comfort

    Ecsta PS71 +9
    69
    Why this score
    SourceZeon RS3-AEcsta PS71
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 66 (est.)75
    Reviews found online5765

    Zeon RS3-A: 40% × 66.2 (est.) + 60% × 56.6 = 60

    Ecsta PS71: 40% × 74.6 + 60% × 65.3 = 69

    No road tests of comfort for Zeon RS3-A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 64

    Noise

    Zeon RS3-A +28
    36
    Why this score
    SourceZeon RS3-AEcsta PS71
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 8 tests≈ 66 (est.)16
    Reviews found online60≈ 66 (est.)

    Zeon RS3-A: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 60 = 64

    Ecsta PS71: 60% × 15.6 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 36

    No road tests of noise for Zeon RS3-A. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

    No owner ratings of noise for Ecsta PS71. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 66

    Treadwear

    Zeon RS3-A +14
    52
    Why this score
    SourceZeon RS3-AEcsta PS71
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 6 tests≈ 66 (est.)46
    Reviews found online6660

    Zeon RS3-A: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 66.2 = 66

    Ecsta PS71: 60% × 46 + 40% × 59.8 = 52

    No road tests of treadwear for Zeon RS3-A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 67

    Handling (owners)

    Ecsta PS71 +6
    73
    Why this score
    SourceZeon RS3-AEcsta PS71
    Reviews found online6773
  8. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    48
    Why this score
    SourceZeon RS3-AEcsta PS71
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 7 tests–48
Scores at a glance
Cooper Zeon RS3-A vs Kumho Ecsta PS71: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryCooper Zeon RS3-AKumho Ecsta PS71
Relative Score 65 70
Dry 64 75
Wet 65 85
Snow 57 –
Comfort 60 69
Noise 64 36
Treadwear 66 52
Handling (owners) 67 73
Efficiency – 48

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Zeon RS3-A

± 5

Ecsta PS71

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Zeon RS3-A

Pros

  • Exceptional dry and wet traction
  • High value and affordable price point
  • Comfortable and responsive ride quality

Cons

  • Shorter tread life due to soft rubber compounds
  • Can become noisy as the tread wears down
  • Mixed performance reported in deep snow or severe winter conditions
All owner themes in the Zeon RS3-A review

Tire B Ecsta PS71

Pros

  • Outstanding wet weather grip and aquaplaning resistance
  • High value for money compared to tier-one premium brands
  • Predictable handling and solid cornering stability in both dry and wet conditions

Cons

  • Noticeable road noise or droning at motorway speeds on certain vehicles
  • Occasional reports of balancing difficulties or out-of-round/egg-shaped tires
  • Softer sidewalls can lead to slightly vague steering response around center or tread block movement
All owner themes in the Ecsta PS71 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Cooper Zeon RS3-A

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Kumho Ecsta PS71

Positive

Community members generally view the Kumho Ecsta PS71 as a capable and reliable mid-range ultra-high performance tire offering solid grip and value for money compared to premium alternatives. While perceived as good once warmed up, some drivers note that it does not quite reach the ultimate grip level of top-tier brands and question its tread wear longevity.

Top themes
#value for money#wet and dry grip#tire wear longevity#sporty handling performance#warm up temperature behavior#mid-range alternative comparison

Based on 23 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Cooper Zeon RS3-A B · Kumho Ecsta PS71
CategoryUltra High Performance All Season tireSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—133
Rim diameters—16″ – 22″
Tread depth10.5/32″—
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall

Which one should you actually buy?

Cooper Zeon RS3-A

Kumho Ecsta PS71

Winner: Kumho Ecsta PS71 — better wet, dry and comfort. Pick the Cooper Zeon RS3-A if noise and treadwear matter most to you.

Pick tire A You want a quieter cabin

Cooper Zeon RS3-A scores 64 vs 36 on noise.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Kumho Ecsta PS71 scores 85 vs 65 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Cooper Zeon RS3-A scores 66 vs 52 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Kumho Ecsta PS71 scores 75 vs 64 on dry.

Tire A · Cooper Zeon RS3-A
Tire B · Kumho Ecsta PS71

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Zeon RS3-A or Ecsta PS71?

Which is better in the wet, Zeon RS3-A or Ecsta PS71?

Kumho Ecsta PS71, 85 vs 65 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Zeon RS3-A or Ecsta PS71?

Kumho Ecsta PS71, 75 vs 64 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, Zeon RS3-A or Ecsta PS71?

Cooper Zeon RS3-A, 64 vs 36 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Zeon RS3-A or Ecsta PS71?

Kumho Ecsta PS71, 69 vs 60 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Zeon RS3-A or Ecsta PS71?

Cooper Zeon RS3-A, 66 vs 52 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology