Dunlop Signature II looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Dunlop Signature II vs Laufenn G FIT AS — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 10 + 15 owner reviews. How we score

G FIT AS is ahead, 59–49

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Dunlop Signature II
Tire ADunlop

Signature II

All-Season tire

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 39 · 10 reviews

Laufenn G FIT AS
Tire BLaufenn

G FIT AS

All Season

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 52 · 15 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 47

    Dry

    G FIT AS +13
    60
    Why this score
    SourceSignature IIG FIT AS
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 55 (est.)≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online3655

    Signature II: 60% × 54.7 (est.) + 40% × 36 = 47

    G FIT AS: 60% × 62.6 (est.) + 40% × 55 = 60

    No road tests of dry for Signature II. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for G FIT AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 49

    Wet

    G FIT AS +9
    58
    Why this score
    SourceSignature IIG FIT AS
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 54 (est.)≈ 61 (est.)
    Reviews found online4153

    Signature II: 60% × 54.3 (est.) + 40% × 40.7 = 49

    G FIT AS: 60% × 61 (est.) + 40% × 52.9 = 58

    No road tests of wet for Signature II. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for G FIT AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 53

    Snow

    G FIT AS +6
    59
    Why this score
    SourceSignature IIG FIT AS
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 61 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online4151

    Signature II: 60% × 61.1 (est.) + 40% × 40.7 = 53

    G FIT AS: 60% × 64.2 (est.) + 40% × 50.5 = 59

    No road tests of snow for Signature II. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for G FIT AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 45

    Comfort

    G FIT AS +16
    61
    Why this score
    SourceSignature IIG FIT AS
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 62 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online3458

    Signature II: 40% × 61.8 (est.) + 60% × 34.4 = 45

    G FIT AS: 40% × 66.5 (est.) + 60% × 57.9 = 61

    No road tests of comfort for Signature II. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for G FIT AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 55

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceSignature IIG FIT AS
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)–
    Reviews found online38–

    Signature II: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 37.5 = 55

    No road tests of noise for Signature II. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 50

    Treadwear

    G FIT AS +5
    55
    Why this score
    SourceSignature IIG FIT AS
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 57 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online4047

    Signature II: 60% × 57 (est.) + 40% × 40 = 50

    G FIT AS: 60% × 59.7 (est.) + 40% × 47.4 = 55

    No road tests of treadwear for Signature II. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for G FIT AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. –

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    56
    Why this score
    SourceSignature IIG FIT AS
    Reviews found online–56
Scores at a glance
Dunlop Signature II vs Laufenn G FIT AS: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryDunlop Signature IILaufenn G FIT AS
Relative Score 49 59
Dry 47 60
Wet 49 58
Snow 53 59
Comfort 45 61
Noise 55 –
Treadwear 50 55
Handling (owners) – 56

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Signature II

± 8

G FIT AS

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Signature II

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B G FIT AS

Pros

  • Affordable, budget-friendly pricing
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Decent dry pavement grip and handling

Cons

  • Poor wet-weather traction with frequent wheel spin from a stop
  • Inadequate winter and snow performance
  • Rapid tread wear or early failure reported by some users
All owner themes in the G FIT AS review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Dunlop Signature II B · Laufenn G FIT AS
CategoryAll-Season tireAll Season
Vehicle type—Passenger Car / Crossover
Tread depth10/32″—
UTQG620 A B500 A A
Treadwear warranty65,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure51 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Dunlop Signature II

Laufenn G FIT AS

Winner: Laufenn G FIT AS — better comfort, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Dunlop Signature II rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Laufenn G FIT AS rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 15 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Laufenn G FIT AS scores 61 vs 45 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Laufenn G FIT AS scores 60 vs 47 on dry.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Laufenn G FIT AS scores 58 vs 49 on wet.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Laufenn G FIT AS scores 59 vs 53 on snow.

Tire A · Dunlop Signature II
Tire B · Laufenn G FIT AS

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Signature II or G FIT AS?

Which is better in the wet, Signature II or G FIT AS?

Laufenn G FIT AS, 58 vs 49 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Signature II or G FIT AS?

Laufenn G FIT AS, 60 vs 47 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Signature II or G FIT AS?

Laufenn G FIT AS, 59 vs 53 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, Signature II or G FIT AS?

Laufenn G FIT AS, 61 vs 45 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Signature II or G FIT AS?

Laufenn G FIT AS, 55 vs 50 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology