Tests – · none yet Owners 52 · 15 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Laufenn G FIT AS vs Hankook Kinergy 4S — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 3 road tests and 15 + 14 owner reviews. How we score
Kinergy 4S is ahead, 69–58
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 68 · 3 tests Owners 68 · 14 reviews
Best test result: #3 of 11 in 2017 All Season VS Winter Tyre Test (dry braking)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
60
Dry
Kinergy 4S +969Why this score
Source G FIT AS Kinergy 4S Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests ≈ 63 (est.) 70 Reviews found online 55 67 G FIT AS: 60% × 62.6 (est.) + 40% × 54.9 = 60
Kinergy 4S: 60% × 69.7 + 40% × 67.3 = 69
No road tests of dry for G FIT AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
58
Wet
Kinergy 4S +1573Why this score
Source G FIT AS Kinergy 4S Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests ≈ 61 (est.) 74 Reviews found online 53 71 G FIT AS: 60% × 61.1 (est.) + 40% × 53 = 58
Kinergy 4S: 60% × 74.1 + 40% × 71 = 73
No road tests of wet for G FIT AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
59
Snow
Kinergy 4S +1170Why this score
Source G FIT AS Kinergy 4S Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 64 (est.) 66 Reviews found online 51 77 G FIT AS: 60% × 64.1 (est.) + 40% × 50.5 = 59
Kinergy 4S: 60% × 66.1 + 40% × 76.6 = 70
No road tests of snow for G FIT AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
61
Comfort
Kinergy 4S +667Why this score
Source G FIT AS Kinergy 4S Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 58 66 G FIT AS: 40% × 66.5 (est.) + 60% × 57.9 = 61
Kinergy 4S: 40% × 68.2 (est.) + 60% × 66 = 67
No road tests of comfort for G FIT AS or Kinergy 4S. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison60Why this score
Source G FIT AS Kinergy 4S Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests – 56 Reviews found online – ≈ 66 (est.) Kinergy 4S: 60% × 56.3 + 40% × 66.5 (est.) = 60
No owner ratings of noise for Kinergy 4S. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
55
Treadwear
Kinergy 4S +863Why this score
Source G FIT AS Kinergy 4S Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 60 (est.) 63 Reviews found online 48 63 G FIT AS: 60% × 59.8 (est.) + 40% × 47.5 = 55
Kinergy 4S: 60% × 62.8 + 40% × 62.8 = 63
No road tests of treadwear for G FIT AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
56
Handling (owners)
Kinergy 4S +864Why this score
Source G FIT AS Kinergy 4S Reviews found online 56 64 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison67Why this score
Source G FIT AS Kinergy 4S Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests – 67
Scores at a glance
| Category | Laufenn G FIT AS | Hankook Kinergy 4S |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 58 | 69 |
| Dry | 60 | 69 |
| Wet | 58 | 73 |
| Snow | 59 | 70 |
| Comfort | 61 | 67 |
| Noise | – | 60 |
| Treadwear | 55 | 63 |
| Handling (owners) | 56 | 64 |
| Efficiency | – | 67 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Recomputed
Headline score
58
/ 100
G FIT AS
69
/ 100
Kinergy 4S
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A G FIT AS
Pros
- Affordable, budget-friendly pricing
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Decent dry pavement grip and handling
Cons
- Poor wet-weather traction with frequent wheel spin from a stop
- Inadequate winter and snow performance
- Rapid tread wear or early failure reported by some users
Tire B Kinergy 4S
Pros
- Exceptional grip and stability in wet and torrential rain conditions
- Strong performance in snow and slush, often cited as a viable alternative to dedicated winter tires
- High value-for-money proposition compared to premium competitors
Cons
- Reports of premature tread wear and shorter-than-expected service life
- Inconsistent dry-road handling and feedback compared to dedicated summer tires
- Occasional reports of poor traction on greasy or specific wet road surfaces
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Laufenn G FIT AS | B · Hankook Kinergy 4S |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 1 | 67 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ | 13″ – 18″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
58
/ 100
Laufenn G FIT AS
69
/ 100
Hankook Kinergy 4S
Winner: Hankook Kinergy 4S — better wet, snow and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Laufenn G FIT AS rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 15 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Hankook Kinergy 4S scores 73 vs 58 on wet.
Pick tire B
You drive through snowy winters
Hankook Kinergy 4S scores 70 vs 59 on snow.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Hankook Kinergy 4S scores 69 vs 60 on dry.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Hankook Kinergy 4S scores 63 vs 55 on treadwear.
Tire A · Laufenn G FIT AS
Tire B · Hankook Kinergy 4S
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
G FIT AS or Kinergy 4S?
Which is better in the wet, G FIT AS or Kinergy 4S?
Hankook Kinergy 4S, 73 vs 58 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, G FIT AS or Kinergy 4S?
Hankook Kinergy 4S, 69 vs 60 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, G FIT AS or Kinergy 4S?
Hankook Kinergy 4S, 70 vs 59 on our snow score.
Which is more comfortable, G FIT AS or Kinergy 4S?
Hankook Kinergy 4S, 67 vs 61 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, G FIT AS or Kinergy 4S?
Hankook Kinergy 4S, 63 vs 55 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology