Dunlop SP Sport 01 AS looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Dunlop SP Sport 01 AS vs Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 6 + 63 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: SP Sport 01 AS 73, BluEarth Es ES32 72.

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Dunlop SP Sport 01 AS
Tire ADunlop

SP Sport 01 AS

All Season

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 73 · 6 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 72

    Dry

    SP Sport 01 AS +1
    71
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport 01 ASBluEarth Es ES32
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online7473

    SP Sport 01 AS: 60% × 70.5 (est.) + 40% × 74.1 = 72

    BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 71

    No road tests of dry for SP Sport 01 AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 73

    Wet

    BluEarth Es ES32 +2
    75
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport 01 ASBluEarth Es ES32
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 73 (est.)≈ 74 (est.)
    Reviews found online7476

    SP Sport 01 AS: 60% × 72.7 (est.) + 40% × 74.3 = 73

    BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 73.8 (est.) + 40% × 76.2 = 75

    No road tests of wet for SP Sport 01 AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 61

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport 01 ASBluEarth Es ES32
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)–
    Reviews found online54–

    SP Sport 01 AS: 60% × 65.3 (est.) + 40% × 54.2 = 61

    No road tests of snow for SP Sport 01 AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 73

    Comfort

    BluEarth Es ES32 +1
    74
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport 01 ASBluEarth Es ES32
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online7576

    SP Sport 01 AS: 40% × 70.1 (est.) + 60% × 75.1 = 73

    BluEarth Es ES32: 40% × 70.2 (est.) + 60% × 75.8 = 74

    No road tests of comfort for SP Sport 01 AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.21).

    No road tests of comfort for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.21).

  5. 74

    Treadwear

    SP Sport 01 AS +8
    66
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport 01 ASBluEarth Es ES32
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online7966

    SP Sport 01 AS: 60% × 70.9 (est.) + 40% × 78.6 = 74

    BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 66.4 = 66

    No road tests of treadwear for SP Sport 01 AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  6. 77

    Handling (owners)

    Level
    77
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport 01 ASBluEarth Es ES32
    Reviews found online7777
Scores at a glance
Dunlop SP Sport 01 AS vs Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryDunlop SP Sport 01 ASYokohama BluEarth Es ES32
Relative Score 73 72
Dry 72 71
Wet 73 75
Snow 61 –
Comfort 73 74
Treadwear 74 66
Handling (owners) 77 77

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

SP Sport 01 AS

± 8

BluEarth Es ES32

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A SP Sport 01 AS

Pros

  • Exceptionally quiet, smooth, and comfortable ride quality
  • Surprising and reliable traction and handling in deep snow
  • Good overall braking and grip performance compared to previous tires

Cons

  • Reports of weak sidewalls leading to premature damage
  • High cost relative to longevity when durability issues arise
All owner themes in the SP Sport 01 AS review

Tire B BluEarth Es ES32

Pros

  • Exceptional ride comfort and smoothness over bumps
  • Noticeably low road noise and quiet operation
  • Strong value for money compared to premium brands

Cons

  • Faster-than-average tread wear reported by some drivers
  • Diminished wet weather grip and increased skidding risk as the tread wears down
  • Not suited for high-performance driving or aggressive cornering
All owner themes in the BluEarth Es ES32 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Dunlop SP Sport 01 AS B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
CategoryAll SeasonSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—64
Rim diameters—13″ – 18″
UTQG220 A B—

Which one should you actually buy?

Dunlop SP Sport 01 AS

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32

Too close to call: Dunlop SP Sport 01 AS and Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 are within 2 points overall. Dunlop SP Sport 01 AS is stronger on treadwear. Dunlop SP Sport 01 AS rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 6 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Dunlop SP Sport 01 AS scores 74 vs 66 on treadwear.

Tire A · Dunlop SP Sport 01 AS
Tire B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

SP Sport 01 AS or BluEarth Es ES32?

Which is better in the wet, SP Sport 01 AS or BluEarth Es ES32?

Neither, by our numbers: 73 vs 75 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, SP Sport 01 AS or BluEarth Es ES32?

Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 71 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, SP Sport 01 AS or BluEarth Es ES32?

Neither, by our numbers: 73 vs 74 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, SP Sport 01 AS or BluEarth Es ES32?

Dunlop SP Sport 01 AS, 74 vs 66 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology