tirewheelguide

Dunlop SP Sport 2050 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Dunlop SP Sport 2050 vs Kumho Ecowing ES31 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 4 + 9,892 owner reviews. How we score

Ecowing ES31 is ahead, 64–52

Check price on Amazon · Ecowing ES31 or SP Sport 2050 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Dunlop SP Sport 2050
Tire ADunlop

SP Sport 2050

Summer Premium Touring tires

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 44 · 4 reviews

Kumho Ecowing ES31
Tire BKumho

Ecowing ES31

Summer

Tests – · none yet Owners 63 · 9,892 reviews

“Certa vez, nos comentários de um vídeo sobre pneus no YouTube, vi a galera que trabalha com Uber falando bem do Ecowing ES31, relatando que tem ótima durabilidade. Resolvi arriscar e coloquei, são ótimos mesmo, já rodei 18 mil km e estão impecáveis ainda.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 54

    Dry

    Ecowing ES31 +11
    65
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport 2050Ecowing ES31
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 59 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online4763

    SP Sport 2050: 60% × 59.3 (est.) + 40% × 46.9 = 54

    Ecowing ES31: 60% × 65.9 (est.) + 40% × 63.1 = 65

    No road tests of dry for SP Sport 2050. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Ecowing ES31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 50

    Wet

    Ecowing ES31 +15
    65
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport 2050Ecowing ES31
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 55 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online4364

    SP Sport 2050: 60% × 55 (est.) + 40% × 43.3 = 50

    Ecowing ES31: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 63.5 = 65

    No road tests of wet for SP Sport 2050. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Ecowing ES31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 57

    Comfort

    Ecowing ES31 +10
    67
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport 2050Ecowing ES31
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online4665

    SP Sport 2050: 60% × 65.1 (est.) + 40% × 46 = 57

    Ecowing ES31: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 64.7 = 67

    No road tests of comfort for SP Sport 2050 or Ecowing ES31. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  4. 57

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport 2050Ecowing ES31
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online40–

    SP Sport 2050: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 40.4 = 57

    No road tests of noise for SP Sport 2050. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 51

    Treadwear

    Ecowing ES31 +12
    63
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport 2050Ecowing ES31
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 58 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online4162

    SP Sport 2050: 60% × 58 (est.) + 40% × 40.7 = 51

    Ecowing ES31: 60% × 64.4 (est.) + 40% × 61.6 = 63

    No road tests of treadwear for SP Sport 2050. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Ecowing ES31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  6. 47

    Handling (owners)

    Ecowing ES31 +12
    59
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport 2050Ecowing ES31
    Reviews found online4759
Scores at a glance
CategoryDunlop SP Sport 2050Kumho Ecowing ES31
Relative Score 52 64
Dry 54 65
Wet 50 65
Comfort 57 67
Noise 57 –
Treadwear 51 63
Handling (owners) 47 59

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

SP Sport 2050

Ecowing ES31

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A SP Sport 2050

Pros

  • Adequate dry road grip and handling response
  • Satisfactory performance in dry and wet conditions for certain drivers
  • Reasonable noise levels on smooth road surfaces

Cons

  • Poor wet weather grip and handling
  • Fast treadwear with low mileage limits (some wearing out within 9,000 to 18,000 miles)
  • Noticeable road noise on damaged or rough road surfaces
All owner themes in the SP Sport 2050 review

Tire B Ecowing ES31

Pros

  • Exceptional value and affordability compared to premium brand alternatives
  • Low road noise and enhanced ride comfort over bumps and speed humps
  • Improved fuel economy and reduced rolling resistance

Cons

  • Polarizing wet weather performance, with some users reporting frightening losses of traction
  • Soft sidewalls that can feel vague during quick lane changes or lead to vulnerability against curbs and potholes
  • Occasional reports of accelerated or uneven tread wear on outer shoulders
All owner themes in the Ecowing ES31 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Dunlop SP Sport 2050

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Kumho Ecowing ES31

Mixed

The Kumho Ecowing ES31 is generally viewed as an affordable, budget-friendly mid-range summer tire that offers good durability and dry grip, making it popular among commuters and rideshare drivers. However, opinions are mixed regarding its wet weather performance, with some users reporting poor wet grip while others find it acceptable for cautious, everyday driving.

r/carros ·8 upvotes ·2026-03-04

“Certa vez, nos comentários de um vídeo sobre pneus no YouTube, vi a galera que trabalha com Uber falando bem do Ecowing ES31, relatando que tem ótima durabilidade. Resolvi arriscar e coloquei, são ótimos mesmo, já rodei 18 mil km e estão impecáveis ainda.”
r/ArAutos ·2 upvotes ·2025-04-04

“Tengo las kumho ecowing es31 y ninguna queja, siempre respondieron bien aunque la verdad manejo como un abuelo, solo una vez frene fuerte en la panamericana y nunca bloquearon, las volveria a poner en otro auto.”
r/CarsAustralia ·2 upvotes ·2026-07-05

“The es31s are utter garbage in the wet. Good in the dry, and last a long time, but awful in the wet. Don't cheap out on tyres. I'd personally avoid most 'eco' tyres, they sacrifice a lot in grip and safety. The ecopia ep150 was class leading when it launched... in 2009. It's an ancient tyre that doesn't hold up anymore. Even worse than the es31s in basically everyway. If you have to get one of those two, DON'T get the ep150s.”
Top themes
#Cost effectiveness and value#Wet weather grip#Treadwear and durability#Budget tier limitations#Urban commuting suitability

Based on 12 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Dunlop SP Sport 2050 B · Kumho Ecowing ES31
CategorySummer Premium Touring tiresSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—39
Rim diameters—13″ – 18″

Which one should you actually buy?

Dunlop SP Sport 2050

Kumho Ecowing ES31

Winner: Kumho Ecowing ES31 — better wet, treadwear and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score. Dunlop SP Sport 2050 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 4 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Kumho Ecowing ES31 scores 65 vs 50 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Kumho Ecowing ES31 scores 63 vs 51 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Kumho Ecowing ES31 scores 59 vs 47 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Kumho Ecowing ES31 scores 65 vs 54 on dry.

Tire A · Dunlop SP Sport 2050
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Kumho Ecowing ES31
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

SP Sport 2050 or Ecowing ES31?

Which is better in the wet, SP Sport 2050 or Ecowing ES31?

Kumho Ecowing ES31, 65 vs 50 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, SP Sport 2050 or Ecowing ES31?

Kumho Ecowing ES31, 65 vs 54 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, SP Sport 2050 or Ecowing ES31?

Kumho Ecowing ES31, 67 vs 57 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, SP Sport 2050 or Ecowing ES31?

Kumho Ecowing ES31, 63 vs 51 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology