tirewheelguide

Dunlop SP Sport 2050M looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Dunlop SP Sport 2050M vs Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 17 + 63 owner reviews. How we score

BluEarth Es ES32 is ahead, 72–34

Check price on Amazon · BluEarth Es ES32 or SP Sport 2050M on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Dunlop SP Sport 2050M
Tire ADunlop

SP Sport 2050M

Summer

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 19 · 17 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 35

    Dry

    BluEarth Es ES32 +36
    71
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport 2050MBluEarth Es ES32
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 47 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online1773

    SP Sport 2050M: 60% × 46.8 (est.) + 40% × 16.7 = 35

    BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 71

    No road tests of dry for SP Sport 2050M. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 36

    Wet

    BluEarth Es ES32 +39
    75
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport 2050MBluEarth Es ES32
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 45 (est.)≈ 74 (est.)
    Reviews found online2376

    SP Sport 2050M: 60% × 44.8 (est.) + 40% × 23.3 = 36

    BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 73.7 (est.) + 40% × 76.2 = 75

    No road tests of wet for SP Sport 2050M. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 36

    Comfort

    BluEarth Es ES32 +38
    74
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport 2050MBluEarth Es ES32
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 59 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online2176

    SP Sport 2050M: 40% × 59 (est.) + 60% × 20.6 = 36

    BluEarth Es ES32: 40% × 70.1 (est.) + 60% × 75.8 = 74

    No road tests of comfort for SP Sport 2050M. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  4. 35

    Treadwear

    BluEarth Es ES32 +32
    67
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport 2050MBluEarth Es ES32
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 48 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online1667

    SP Sport 2050M: 60% × 48.2 (est.) + 40% × 15.8 = 35

    BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 66.5 = 67

    No road tests of treadwear for SP Sport 2050M. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  5. 23

    Handling (owners)

    BluEarth Es ES32 +54
    77
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport 2050MBluEarth Es ES32
    Reviews found online2377
Scores at a glance
CategoryDunlop SP Sport 2050MYokohama BluEarth Es ES32
Relative Score 34 72
Dry 35 71
Wet 36 75
Comfort 36 74
Treadwear 35 67
Handling (owners) 23 77

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

SP Sport 2050M

± 8

BluEarth Es ES32

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A SP Sport 2050M

Pros

  • Good dry weather handling and feedback when temperatures are warm
  • High tread life reported by a small minority of conservative drivers
  • Clear communication of road conditions through steering feedback

Cons

  • Hazardous and untrustworthy grip in wet conditions, rain, and standing water
  • Extremely rapid front-tire wear, with many users needing replacements between 9,000 and 15,000 miles
  • High road noise and harsh, rock-like ride comfort
All owner themes in the SP Sport 2050M review

Tire B BluEarth Es ES32

Pros

  • Exceptional ride comfort and smoothness over bumps
  • Noticeably low road noise and quiet operation
  • Strong value for money compared to premium brands

Cons

  • Faster-than-average tread wear reported by some drivers
  • Diminished wet weather grip and increased skidding risk as the tread wears down
  • Not suited for high-performance driving or aggressive cornering
All owner themes in the BluEarth Es ES32 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Dunlop SP Sport 2050M B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—64
Rim diameters—13″ – 18″

Which one should you actually buy?

Dunlop SP Sport 2050M

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32

Winner: Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — better handling, wet and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Dunlop SP Sport 2050M rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 17 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 77 vs 23 on handling.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 75 vs 36 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 74 vs 36 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 71 vs 35 on dry.

Tire A · Dunlop SP Sport 2050M
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

SP Sport 2050M or BluEarth Es ES32?

Which is better in the wet, SP Sport 2050M or BluEarth Es ES32?

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 75 vs 36 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, SP Sport 2050M or BluEarth Es ES32?

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 71 vs 35 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, SP Sport 2050M or BluEarth Es ES32?

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 74 vs 36 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, SP Sport 2050M or BluEarth Es ES32?

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 67 vs 35 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology