Head-to-head Updated

Dunlop SP Sport 270 vs Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 11 + 60 owner reviews. How we score

BluEarth Es ES32 is ahead, 70–38

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Dunlop SP Sport 270
Tire ADunlop

SP Sport 270

Summer

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 23 · 11 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 43

    Dry

    BluEarth Es ES32 +27
    70
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport 270BluEarth Es ES32
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 52 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online3071

    SP Sport 270: 60% × 52.3 (est.) + 40% × 29.5 = 43

    BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 68.9 (est.) + 40% × 70.6 = 70

    No road tests of dry for SP Sport 270. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 33

    Wet

    BluEarth Es ES32 +39
    72
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport 270BluEarth Es ES32
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 42 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online2073

    SP Sport 270: 60% × 41.8 (est.) + 40% × 19.9 = 33

    BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 71.3 (est.) + 40% × 72.5 = 72

    No road tests of wet for SP Sport 270. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 49

    Comfort

    BluEarth Es ES32 +23
    72
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport 270BluEarth Es ES32
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 62 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online3074

    SP Sport 270: 60% × 62.3 (est.) + 40% × 29.8 = 49

    BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 74.3 = 72

    No road tests of comfort for SP Sport 270 or BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  4. 38

    Treadwear

    BluEarth Es ES32 +27
    65
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport 270BluEarth Es ES32
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 51 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online1865

    SP Sport 270: 60% × 51 (est.) + 40% × 18.1 = 38

    BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 65.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.6 = 65

    No road tests of treadwear for SP Sport 270. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  5. 28

    Handling (owners)

    BluEarth Es ES32 +45
    73
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport 270BluEarth Es ES32
    Reviews found online2873
Scores at a glance
Dunlop SP Sport 270 vs Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryDunlop SP Sport 270Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
Relative Score 38 70
Dry 43 70
Wet 33 72
Comfort 49 72
Treadwear 38 65
Handling (owners) 28 73

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

SP Sport 270

BluEarth Es ES32

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A SP Sport 270

Pros

  • Acceptable performance in dry road conditions
  • Reasonable steering feel and quietness early in its lifespan

Cons

  • Extremely poor and dangerous wet weather traction, often described as driving on ice
  • Rapid and uneven tread wear, with many users needing replacements well under 30,000 km
  • Prone to significant understeer and wheel slip on steep slopes or during low-speed maneuvers in the rain
All owner themes in the SP Sport 270 review

Tire B BluEarth Es ES32

Pros

  • Exceptional ride comfort and noise reduction
  • Strong value proposition compared to premium brands
  • Reliable dry-weather traction and handling

Cons

  • Wet-weather grip can become unpredictable as tread depth decreases
  • Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting premature wear
  • Sidewalls may be susceptible to damage from severe potholes
All owner themes in the BluEarth Es ES32 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Dunlop SP Sport 270 B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available464
Rim diameters17″ – 18″13″ – 18″
Sizes in common22

Which one should you actually buy?

Dunlop SP Sport 270

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32

Winner: Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — better handling, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Dunlop SP Sport 270 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 73 vs 28 on handling.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 72 vs 33 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 70 vs 43 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 65 vs 38 on treadwear.

Tire A · Dunlop SP Sport 270
Tire B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

SP Sport 270 or BluEarth Es ES32?

Which is better in the wet, SP Sport 270 or BluEarth Es ES32?

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 72 vs 33 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, SP Sport 270 or BluEarth Es ES32?

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 70 vs 43 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, SP Sport 270 or BluEarth Es ES32?

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 72 vs 49 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, SP Sport 270 or BluEarth Es ES32?

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 65 vs 38 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology