Tests – · none yet Owners 23 · 11 reviews
Dunlop SP Sport 270 vs Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 11 + 60 owner reviews. How we score
BluEarth Es ES32 is ahead, 70–38
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 70 · 60 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
43
Dry
BluEarth Es ES32 +2770Why this score
Source SP Sport 270 BluEarth Es ES32 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 52 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 30 71 SP Sport 270: 60% × 52.3 (est.) + 40% × 29.5 = 43
BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 68.9 (est.) + 40% × 70.6 = 70
No road tests of dry for SP Sport 270. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
33
Wet
BluEarth Es ES32 +3972Why this score
Source SP Sport 270 BluEarth Es ES32 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 42 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 20 73 SP Sport 270: 60% × 41.8 (est.) + 40% × 19.9 = 33
BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 71.3 (est.) + 40% × 72.5 = 72
No road tests of wet for SP Sport 270. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
49
Comfort
BluEarth Es ES32 +2372Why this score
Source SP Sport 270 BluEarth Es ES32 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 62 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 30 74 SP Sport 270: 60% × 62.3 (est.) + 40% × 29.8 = 49
BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 74.3 = 72
No road tests of comfort for SP Sport 270 or BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
38
Treadwear
BluEarth Es ES32 +2765Why this score
Source SP Sport 270 BluEarth Es ES32 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 51 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 18 65 SP Sport 270: 60% × 51 (est.) + 40% × 18.1 = 38
BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 65.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.6 = 65
No road tests of treadwear for SP Sport 270. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
28
Handling (owners)
BluEarth Es ES32 +4573Why this score
Source SP Sport 270 BluEarth Es ES32 Reviews found online 28 73
Scores at a glance
| Category | Dunlop SP Sport 270 | Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 38 | 70 |
| Dry | 43 | 70 |
| Wet | 33 | 72 |
| Comfort | 49 | 72 |
| Treadwear | 38 | 65 |
| Handling (owners) | 28 | 73 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
SP Sport 270
BluEarth Es ES32
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A SP Sport 270
Pros
- Acceptable performance in dry road conditions
- Reasonable steering feel and quietness early in its lifespan
Cons
- Extremely poor and dangerous wet weather traction, often described as driving on ice
- Rapid and uneven tread wear, with many users needing replacements well under 30,000 km
- Prone to significant understeer and wheel slip on steep slopes or during low-speed maneuvers in the rain
Tire B BluEarth Es ES32
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and noise reduction
- Strong value proposition compared to premium brands
- Reliable dry-weather traction and handling
Cons
- Wet-weather grip can become unpredictable as tread depth decreases
- Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting premature wear
- Sidewalls may be susceptible to damage from severe potholes
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Dunlop SP Sport 270 | B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 4 | 64 |
| Rim diameters | 17″ – 18″ | 13″ – 18″ |
| Sizes in common | 2 | 2 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Dunlop SP Sport 270
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
Winner: Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — better handling, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Dunlop SP Sport 270 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 73 vs 28 on handling.
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 72 vs 33 on wet.
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 70 vs 43 on dry.
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 65 vs 38 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
SP Sport 270 or BluEarth Es ES32?
Which is better in the wet, SP Sport 270 or BluEarth Es ES32?
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 72 vs 33 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, SP Sport 270 or BluEarth Es ES32?
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 70 vs 43 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, SP Sport 270 or BluEarth Es ES32?
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 72 vs 49 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, SP Sport 270 or BluEarth Es ES32?
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 65 vs 38 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology